Advertisement
Ad slot
Lecture 12: IS-LM-PC Model continued 46:05

Lecture 12: IS-LM-PC Model continued

MIT OpenCourseWare · May 11, 2026
Open on YouTube
Transcript ~7649 words · 46:05
0:16
let me um continue with the eslm PC
0:20
model in fact I want to I Rush a little
0:23
because I was over excited with the svb
0:26
bank event H and and I want to make sure
0:30
that you
0:31
certainly understand this this mle it's
0:34
going to be very
0:36
important and I think it's one of the
Advertisement
Ad slot
0:38
most important moles in in this course
0:40
as I said
0:41
before also I want to use a little bit
0:45
more the this Mo itself to explain what
0:47
is going on right now today we got hit
0:49
by a second shock from the financial
0:51
system and uh so so it's getting it's
0:55
getting exciting these days so let me
0:59
skip all this and remind you that that's
1:02
what we we that's that's the ISL MPC
Advertisement
Ad slot
1:05
model which I said is nothing else and
1:08
just integrating the islm analysis with
1:11
the Philips curve this is the part and I
1:13
said and at this point I will follow the
1:16
book and and assume that the central
1:18
bank can control the real interest rate
1:20
rather than the nominal interest rate
1:22
which is what really controls in
1:23
practice H but I'm going to make that
1:26
assumption so the pictures have less
1:27
curves moving around when when things
1:29
are mov moving H as when we do Dynamics
1:33
okay but that's just a eslm nothing
1:37
different um then we look at the Philips
1:42
curve and I said well we can we can uh I
1:46
this is not very useful because you know
1:48
in the as part I have output here and in
1:52
the Philips curves I have inflation but
1:54
then I have an employment and I don't
1:55
want to be carrying around sort of three
1:57
variables endogenous variables
2:00
ER and and and so it's you know it's
2:03
difficult to diagrams in in three
2:05
dimension is everything less clear so
2:07
I'm going to replace H this unemployment
2:11
here for for output and it's very easy
2:14
to do that with the production function
2:15
we have because output is just equal to
2:18
employment and employment is just equal
2:21
to the labor force time one minus the
2:23
rate of unemployment and we could Define
2:25
a concept of potential output as simply
2:28
that output that happens when employment
2:30
is equal to the Natural level of
2:32
employment which is equal to the labor
2:34
force Time 1 minus the natural rate of
2:37
unemployment and taking the difference
2:39
subtracting the second line from the
2:41
first one you get a concept that is used
2:43
very frequently in microeconomics which
2:45
is called is a concept of the output gap
2:47
an output Gap refers to the difference
2:49
between actual output and potential
2:51
output in which potential output is
2:53
nothing else of the level of output that
2:55
you get when employment when an
2:57
employment is at the natural rate of an
2:59
employment
3:00
so we get this output Gap is related to
3:02
the employment gap and now we can
3:05
replace the employment gap from here
3:08
with the output Gap and we end up with a
3:11
Philip Cur in the space of inflation and
3:13
output gap which is something we can
3:16
integrate very easily withm model that
3:19
has output in it okay so that's H so the
3:23
snpc model is
3:25
really combining this equation with that
3:29
equation and some model about expected
3:31
inflation that's what the MPC model is
3:35
so I gave you one example here one model
3:38
of inflation this is a case of that
3:40
central banks do not like the an Anor
3:42
unanchor inflation expectation that's my
3:45
model of expectation then my Philips
3:47
curve I plug this into my Philips curve
3:50
and I get this relationship between the
3:52
change in inflation and the output Gap
3:55
and it's an increasing relationship and
3:57
that's what I'm plotting here for any
3:59
given
4:00
level for any given level of YN then as
4:03
a increase output the Philips curve the
4:07
change in inflation the left hand side
4:09
the difference between inflation expect
4:10
to inflation Rises that's the reason
4:12
this upward is sloping and the reason
4:14
this Rises has to do with all the things
4:16
that happen in the labor market no if an
4:18
employment if output Rises meaning an
4:21
employment is falling you need more
4:23
employment to produce more output if
4:24
that's the case it's more wage pressure
4:26
that leads to a price pressure because
4:29
there is a the market in between wages
4:30
and prices and that's the way you get
4:33
into inflation okay so I gave you one
4:37
example says okay
4:40
suppose that we have some equilibrium
4:42
level of output this which is the result
4:45
of this monetary policy this rate set by
4:48
by by the central bank and and that's
4:52
the is which is a function of you know
4:54
the fiscal policy of the country how
4:55
confident are consumers and all these
4:57
kind of things so in quiz one we really
5:01
worry only about this top diagram okay
5:03
and all the shocks we had were shocks
5:05
that happen in this top diagram and we
5:08
and we look at what happened to Output
5:10
to equilibrium output as a
5:12
result now this hasn't changed it hasn't
5:15
change that block is the same as it used
5:17
to be the only difference that we have
5:19
here is that this level of output H
5:22
which is the equilibrium level of output
5:24
at any point in time needs not be equal
5:26
to potential output and if it is not
5:28
equal to potential output that will lead
5:30
to something with inflation either
5:32
inflation disinflation or something of
5:34
that kind in this particular case the
5:37
equilibrium level of output which is
5:39
still determined as we used to determine
5:40
it happens to be higher than the natural
5:43
rate of
5:44
output and if if output is higher than
5:47
the rate of output that means this is
5:50
positive which means inflation is rising
5:52
and that's exactly what we see here it
5:55
means inflation is above expected
5:56
inflation when expected inflation is
5:58
equal to lag inflation
6:00
then that means inflation is rising okay
6:03
and that's what we have
6:05
here so any question about that so this
6:08
is we just what we did is kept analysis
6:11
we used to have and now we added this
6:14
diagram here at the bottom because it
6:16
turns out that yes any equilibrium here
6:19
if I move the inter around I'm going to
6:21
change the equilibrium level of output
6:22
those all those are equilibrium levels
6:24
output but that doesn't mean that that
6:27
they're consistent with the natural ER H
6:29
with potential output and if it's not
6:32
equal to potential output it's a valid
6:34
equilibrium at any point in time but
6:35
it's going to lead to issues on the
6:38
inflation front that's all that the the
6:40
second diagram here tells you that we
6:43
get issues on the inflation front with
6:46
any equilibrium level of output that is
6:49
different from the natural rate of
6:51
output that's what this diagram
6:54
does so then I said well and that's what
6:57
happen in the short run that's what it
6:58
does so we keep doing what we used to do
7:00
in the first seven lectures or so and uh
7:04
this diagram just tells us what are the
7:05
implications for inflation that's in the
7:07
short run the medium run we said is when
7:10
we is that process in which output
7:13
converges back to the Natural rate to
7:16
potential output how does that happen
7:19
well it involves the central bank but
7:22
it's not that the central bank is doing
7:23
crazyy things effect Central Bank is
7:25
reacting to what the economy is telling
7:27
it needs to do here is a central bank
7:29
that supposed had
7:31
was before doing whatever change in the
7:33
interest rate or in the deliver this
7:36
equilibrium output here had an inflation
7:38
of around 2% that was consistent with
7:40
the target it had now suddenly it finds
7:42
itself in a situation like this and
7:44
inflation starts climbing okay you get
7:47
3% one year 4% the next one 6 nine in a
7:51
situation like that well it's very
7:53
natural for that Central Bank if it's a
7:54
responsible Central Bank to react to
7:56
that and the only reaction a central
7:58
bank can have
8:00
the main the main reaction can have is
8:01
to raise interest rates okay and that's
8:03
exactly what it starts happening if the
8:05
Central Bank finds itself with inflation
8:07
in this Cas is that is accelerating it
8:10
will start increasing interest rate and
8:13
this process of acceleration of
8:14
inflation in this case would only stop
8:17
when output is equal to the Natural to
8:19
potential output okay and output is
8:22
equal we can Define implicitly what that
8:25
interest rate is and we can call it the
8:26
natural rate of interest rate sometimes
8:28
we call it we sell
8:30
interest rate of interest rate neutral
8:32
interest rate R star lots of names for
8:35
this interest rate but this interest is
8:37
simply the one that gives us an
8:39
equilibrium output in our asln diagram
8:41
that is equal to potential output that's
8:46
that's all that this RN means and here
8:48
I'm solving it you know it's is the rate
8:51
that implicitly gives us an equilibrium
8:53
output here H that is equal to the
8:55
Natural rate of output okay that defines
8:58
it implicitly
8:59
okay there we are is all that
9:04
clear yes okay I think you're going to
9:07
have a a big chunk of your current pie
9:09
set is about this model and so on and
9:12
and that's a good thing and you'll see
9:13
it also in the next one this again I
9:15
think this is important then I talk
9:17
about the difference between anchor and
9:20
an anchor expectations I said look here
9:23
we have a situation that suppose we
9:25
started at 2% and then we found ourself
9:28
in a situation like that that means
9:30
inflation start building up we got to 9%
9:33
or so so now the FED gets scared and it
9:35
starts raising interest rates so that's
9:37
what we're moving up lower in output and
9:39
as it lowers output reduces the output
9:41
Gap and therefore reduces the change in
9:45
inflation here but inflation keeps
9:47
rising in this particular model because
9:49
expected inflation is an anchor and I
9:52
said well suppose that eventually the
9:53
FED gets to that interest rate here so
9:56
we get to situation like that and I
9:58
asked the question has the FED solved
10:00
the problem now okay finally we got to
10:03
situation where the the interest rate is
10:05
equal to an natural rate of interest
10:07
rate that tells me that output is equal
10:09
to potential output that tells me here
10:11
that inflation is not changing problem
10:14
is that we already had inflation of 9%
10:17
at some point so so here inflation stops
10:20
rising in this particular model with
10:22
expected inflation an anchor expected
10:24
inflation but stopping is not enough
10:27
because that's gives leaves us level of
10:29
inflation of
10:30
9% that means that the FED in order to
10:33
bring back inflation to 2% it needs to
10:36
go into this region so inflation starts
10:39
coming down from 9% 7% 6% 5% and so on
10:44
okay so if you have an anchor
10:46
expectation and and inflation overshoots
10:49
you're going to have to cause a
10:50
recession and probably a severe
10:52
recession there's no way around that and
10:55
that's what the FED has been struggling
10:56
to do is is struggling not to because
10:59
the Fed we are in a situation not only
11:01
in the US but in the US in particular
11:03
where inflation is way above the target
11:05
level H but expected inflation has been
11:08
more or less stable and so this when
11:11
people talk about being able to restore
11:14
sort of reasonable levels of inflation
11:17
in a soft landed manner with a soft
11:20
Landing that means that you don't need
11:22
to cost a b recession to bring inflation
11:25
back to 2% you just can bring it
11:28
smoothly here with this model of
11:30
expected inflation doesn't work but if
11:32
expect if the Bank Central Bank has
11:34
credibility H and inflation remain Anor
11:37
people continue to believe that the FED
11:39
will go back to 2% then you don't need
11:41
to cause a big recession otherwise you
11:43
need to invest in bringing expectations
11:45
down and that the only way you can
11:47
invest in doing that is causing a
11:48
recession okay but that's the reason I
11:51
said central banks worry so much about
11:54
keeping inflation credibility because
11:56
otherwise they need to
11:57
overshoot in order to restore um long
12:03
run balance
12:05
okay
12:07
good
12:09
now you may Wonder well this I mean this
12:12
looks pretty simple to do no just if you
12:15
have a problem like this just go quickly
12:18
to that point there no and then the
12:21
problem is over you don't let inflation
12:23
build to 9% or something like that you
12:26
react immediately the problem is there's
12:28
a f sentence that was going by Milton
12:31
fredman is that monetary policy acts on
12:34
the economy with long and variable lags
12:37
so first of all it's very difficult at
12:39
any point in time to know where is
12:41
potential output or what is the natural
12:43
rate of unemployment I mean you sort of
12:45
sense it but the truth is that the only
12:47
way you really know is is by looking at
12:50
inflation so it's inflation that really
12:52
tells you that you're one side of the
12:53
other it's very difficult to you you
12:56
have some historical average and so on
12:58
but these things do move move around so
13:00
it's difficult at any point in time to
13:01
know whether you you are at our end or
13:04
not the second thing is that here
13:07
everything happens immediately if I move
13:10
immediately then output immediately
13:11
jumps here that's not the way monetary
13:13
policy operates in practice it takes
13:15
time for monetary policy to to to affect
13:18
the economy and so this the situation
13:22
that happened I I would say until last
13:25
week was the FED knew that the inflation
13:28
was still to too high but it but it also
13:31
knew that it had done a lot he had hiked
13:33
rates very aggressively by a lot and
13:35
since there are lags between the the
13:38
increasing interest rate and and the
13:40
declining output the fed's concern was
13:44
well it's clear that I still have
13:45
inflation but it may well be the case
13:47
that when this thing finally hits the
13:49
economy it hits us too much and we end
13:51
up in a recession and an unwanted
13:53
recession that was a concern okay H now
13:58
with what is happening right now there's
13:59
a little bit of a concern that we got to
14:01
that point because things were very slow
14:03
for a variety of reasons but now
14:05
something broke and the question is now
14:08
that something has broken well will we
14:11
sort of decelerate the economy very very
14:13
fast and that's a concern that's what is
14:15
happening right now okay but that's what
14:18
makes monetary policy much more
14:20
difficult than this little diagram is
14:21
that you you have all this lags these
14:23
uncertainties and all these
14:25
nonlinearities and Sly things happen
14:30
okay let me tell you when things can go
14:33
really really wrong it's not the issue
14:35
now but but we're very close to that
14:38
during the global recession Japan has
14:41
experienced several episodes like this
14:43
which is the following suppose you have
14:45
a situation where ER your inflation is
14:50
low typically these things happen in
14:52
situations where your inflation is low
14:54
and for whatever reason your natural
14:57
rate of unemployment is is
14:59
negative so you have inflation close to
15:02
zero say and then the natural rate
15:06
of interest rate is
15:08
negative what's the problem suppose you
15:11
have a zero lower
15:12
bound well if you have a zero lower
15:14
bound means that you're not going to hit
15:16
this
15:17
rate the best you can do if inflation is
15:20
around zero then you set the nominal
15:21
interest rate to zero and then the real
15:23
interest rate is around
15:24
zero well the problem is that at zero
15:29
you generate negative
15:33
inflation but if you generate negative
15:36
inflation and the nominal interest rate
15:38
is fixed at zero then now you get a
15:40
positive real interest rate because the
15:42
real interest rate is equal to the
15:44
nominal interest rate which is zero
15:46
minus inflation expected inflation but
15:49
if expected inflation or inflation is
15:52
negative minus minus is positive so that
15:54
means your real interest rate is
15:56
actually positive so your really you you
15:59
wanted something negative but you end up
16:00
with something
16:02
positive that means now you have a big
16:04
gap
16:05
here so
16:07
inflation you get into a deflation now
16:10
now inflation is very very low it gets
16:11
very negative well your real as
16:14
inflation gets more and more negative
16:16
your real interest keeps climbing so you
16:18
keep moving further and further away
16:20
from the natural rate of interest rate
16:23
that's something that is very scary for
16:26
an economy is a def deflationary trap
16:29
and that's the way you get
16:31
into deep recessions in fact that's what
16:34
happened during the Great Recession in
16:36
the
16:36
US the
16:38
no during the Great Depression in the US
16:42
okay during the Great Recession we were
16:44
close to it but we didn't get quite
16:46
there in in because lots of things were
16:48
done to prevent a repeat of the Great
16:52
Depression the one of the biggest
16:54
problems with the Great Depression ER
16:57
was that ER monetary policy was not
17:01
against the zero lower bound but it was
17:03
very slow to
17:04
react okay they were in a situation like
17:07
in this diagram
17:10
here and and but they kept the interest
17:12
rate high and they moveed very slowly
17:16
and when they tried to catch up well
17:18
they were into deflation environment so
17:20
the real interet was moving away from
17:22
them despite the fact that they were
17:24
moving the nominal interest rate down
17:26
and that you can see here so there the
17:28
Great depression starts around 1929 it
17:31
starts really in
17:33
1929 H an employment initially was low
17:36
then nominal interest rate was around 5%
17:39
and inflation rate growth declined very
17:41
rapidly in inflation rate was around
17:44
zero so you had a one year the real
17:47
interest rate was around 5% as well okay
17:50
well things got worse and employment
17:53
began to climb very rapidly and so the
17:57
FED began to lower interest rates
17:58
nominal interest rate you know it went
18:00
from 5% to 4% those were unusually low
18:04
interest rate for the time but the
18:06
problem is that the inflation by then
18:08
was minus 2 and a half% so the real
18:11
interest rate they were lowering the
18:13
nominal interest rate but the real
18:14
interest rate was rising and
18:16
unemployment accordingly was Rising as
18:19
well it kept going no look see then they
18:23
began to cut the interest rate more
18:24
aggressively okay but but we got into
18:28
real deflation minus 10% or so so the
18:31
real interest rate kept
18:33
climbing at that point was a very poor
18:36
Le time interest rate hike was a
18:39
disaster for unemployment and because it
18:42
really hied the interest rate real
18:44
interest rate even more and eventually
18:46
got got out of it with a bunch of
18:48
policies that were non monetary policies
18:49
but but
18:51
um but that's that's what happened so so
18:53
the Great Depression was very much a
18:55
story of this
18:57
kind in which essentially we get we fall
19:01
fell into depression so that interest
19:03
rate when began to climb and got the
19:05
economy deeper and deeper into recession
19:07
and employment Higher and Higher and so
19:09
on and at some point monetary policy
19:11
just didn't work so that's the reason
19:13
you have essentially do massive fiscal
19:15
policy to get out of
19:19
it let's let me talk about some of the
19:22
shocks we have discussed in the context
19:24
of this more complete model now ER and
19:27
and actually okay let me go let me talk
19:31
about sort of two canonical type shocks
19:33
you can have two broad type of shocks or
19:36
or policies in in this
19:38
Ms that you want to
19:40
analyze some of them are aggregate
19:42
demand either policies or shocks
19:44
whatever those are things that you know
19:46
aggregate demand policies move the is
19:48
curve okay the is and the LM but moves
19:52
operates in the in the in the in the
19:54
Goods Market so this is one case of a
19:57
contractionary f policy no a fiscal
20:00
consolidation so what happens here
20:02
suppose you start an equilibrium level
20:04
of output H equal to Natural rate of
20:07
output but now for whatever reason we're
20:08
running deficits that are very large you
20:10
want to reduce the size of the deficit
20:13
well you move the is to the left no you
20:15
cut government expenditure you increase
20:17
taxes that will bring output below the
20:19
natural rate of output you go to the
20:21
Philips curve here that means inflation
20:23
now you you get into deflationary forces
20:26
or inflation starts declining the result
20:29
of that so in the short run you get
20:30
exactly what we had in lecture five six
20:32
or whatever know you get a contraction
20:35
in real output but on top of that you
20:37
start getting inflation coming down or
20:40
even going negative and as a result of
20:42
that the central bank will react and it
20:45
will react and that reaction will stop
20:47
when in the long run well when output
20:49
goes back to the initial level of output
20:52
it's natural rate of output okay so the
20:54
point of this picture that is new
20:57
relative to things you already knew
20:59
is that in the short run you get very
21:01
much the type of responses we had
21:02
earlier on in the medium run that is
21:05
when now in the medium run you don't get
21:07
that a fiscal consolation does not
21:09
reduce output in the medium Run Okay a
21:12
fiscal consolation what does is reduces
21:14
the real interest rate in the in the in
21:16
the long in the medium run okay so you
21:18
see here output eventually goes back to
21:21
that level with a much lower real
21:23
interest rate and and
21:25
U the the point is sometimes this this
21:29
path this path that takes you output
21:31
down initially and then comes back can
21:33
be very painful it can take a long time
21:36
generate a recession and so on and
21:38
sometimes it can happen in easier
21:41
conditions and be faster and so on many
21:43
of the policies agreements that people
21:45
have people that understand what they're
21:47
talking about had to do with the speed
21:50
at which these things happen so
21:51
sometimes you know people can agree that
21:53
you need a fiscal consolidation but
21:55
someone think no this stuff is going to
21:56
be very slow and so I don't want to
21:59
incur in a very deep recession for very
22:00
long just to adjust a little bit the
22:01
fiscal deficit and others may think the
22:04
opposite okay it's it's mostly about the
22:06
speed but shorter response to a fiscal
22:09
consolidation or to any aggregate demand
22:11
contraction is different than the medium
22:14
ter
22:18
response and again the signals for the
22:21
central bank that it needs to move
22:22
interest rate they all come from this
22:23
block here inflation falling that tells
22:25
the Central Bank oops we may have a
22:28
problem and so on another kind of shock
22:32
that is is is is is more complicated and
22:35
that has played a role actually very
22:37
much in the recovery from covid is some
22:39
sort of supply side shock for example an
22:43
oil shock okay price of energy goes up
22:45
or something like that well that one how
22:49
do you analyze that the a supply size
22:51
shock is not something that comes from
22:53
the that we go to the slm part of the
22:56
mall a supply size shock remember we
22:58
analyze it when we did analyze the
23:00
natural rate of natural rate of
23:01
unemployment it's something that affects
23:03
the supply side of the economy we can
23:06
model that as an increase in the markup
23:09
and we know that an increase in the
23:11
markup will increase the natural rate of
23:14
unemployment that means that that that
23:18
this shock will do what to potential
23:24
output so an energy shock especially if
23:27
it's a persist one will operate like a
23:30
markup shock and that we know will
23:34
increase the natural rate of
23:36
unemployment so what happens to the to
23:39
potential
23:41
output goes down of course it's it's
23:44
know output is equal to employment to
23:46
labor force times 1 minus the natural
23:48
rate of unemployment if the natural rate
23:49
of unemployment goes up then the
23:51
potential output goes down so that is
23:54
not a shift in the top diagram it's a
23:56
shift in the lower diagram it says we
23:58
used to have this Philips curve and now
24:01
the Philips curve has shifted to the
24:03
left because we have a new natural rate
24:06
of an output and remember the natural
24:08
rate of output is that point when a ER
24:12
output equal to the Natural rate of
24:14
output doesn't produce inflationary
24:16
forces okay so what happened with this
24:20
shock here so suppose the economy was in
24:22
this equilibrium here and now it gets
24:25
hit by an oil shock
24:29
in the short run if no one reacts
24:31
nothing happens to Output doesn't move
24:33
much but what
24:41
happens you see if I don't move
24:43
something in this part of the diagram
24:45
and not move equilibrium output in the
24:47
short run equilibrium output is
24:49
determined exactly in the same way we
24:50
have determined up to now so if we get a
24:52
markup shock nothing happens to Output
24:56
if no no one no if no moves nothing
24:59
happens to help in the short but what
25:05
happens that we may not like yeah
25:08
exactly what happen is the the Philips
25:11
curve went up before that level of
25:13
output was consistent with no changes in
25:16
inflation now it's not we get an
25:20
increase in inflation so the first place
25:22
where you'll see a the effect of the of
25:26
of of the oil shock here is inflation
25:28
will pick up remember the price of
25:29
gasoline going up and all those things
25:31
well that's where you see it first
25:33
before activity Falls you see it there
25:36
that's what mess up the Philips curve
25:37
also in the 70s and 80s we going to see
25:40
lots of shocks of this kind initially
25:42
unemployment didn't move M much but
25:44
inflation keeps
25:46
climbing so that's what happens well
25:48
obviously when that happens if it's
25:50
persistent typically central banks if
25:51
they think it's very short live they're
25:53
not going to react to this stuff but if
25:54
if it is persistent and they think it's
25:56
persistent then the reaction is what
25:59
well they need to this only means that
26:02
the natural rate of
26:03
an the the natural rate of interest has
26:06
gone up no because I need to for that
26:08
same is I need to bring down equilibrium
26:12
output that means I need a higher
26:14
natural rate of interest rate or a
26:16
higher rst star so what the FED needs to
26:19
do the Central Bank needs to do is just
26:20
start increasing interest rate that's an
26:22
natural
26:23
response a lot of what happened during
26:25
the covid why inflation pick up so much
26:28
much in in Co is because we had a shock
26:30
of this kind it was not energy the
26:33
energy shock came later but it was
26:35
supply side transport transport cost and
26:38
stuff like that the network the
26:40
production Network and things like that
26:41
that broke down but they thought it was
26:44
going to be very temporary so
26:47
understanding this model they thought
26:48
okay look this this Curve will come back
26:51
come back that but by itself so better
26:54
not react right now why cause a
26:55
recession if really this Curve will come
26:58
down back down by itself well the
27:02
problem is that it didn't come back by
27:03
itself that fast some things came up
27:06
fairly fast some others did not in
27:09
particular labor for participation did
27:11
not come sufficiently fast back and so
27:15
that's the reason we stay too long in a
27:17
situation like this and that's one of
27:20
the main reasons inflation sort of creep
27:23
up in in the US and also in other places
27:25
in the world in Europe the big reason
27:29
for for why inflation picked up there is
27:31
because this curve move a lot up why is
27:40
that exactly you know they had a massive
27:43
energy shock and so that moved that
27:45
curve up a
27:48
lot
27:50
good let's I want to now return to what
27:54
is going on right
27:55
now ER oh actually first I'm going to
27:59
yeah right now meaning the last few days
28:01
so it turns out that this diagram that
28:04
that I use for the fiscal consolidation
28:06
shock can also be used to understand a
28:09
little bit what happens with
28:12
the um Silicon Valley Bank event okay
28:16
remember we model that as a credit shock
28:19
we say like like that X we had it's like
28:21
X going up well X going up that's
28:24
exactly that it moves the yes to the
28:26
left so a shock to
28:30
X to to the a panic of the kind that we
28:34
saw is like that it moves the to the
28:37
left why is
28:38
that so for any given level of the safe
28:41
real interest rate a panic a shock to
28:44
credit and so on moves the a to the left
28:47
why is
28:52
that exactly so so the real the safe
28:55
interest rate doesn't go up but but but
28:58
what goes up is is is the cost of
29:01
borrowing because you know firms need to
29:04
pay this this extra risk premium and and
29:07
then for any given safe interest rate
29:09
real interest rate firms have to pay
29:12
more which means there is less
29:14
investment for any given level of the
29:15
real interest rate and so the is moves
29:17
to the left and if that happens then you
29:20
start getting deflationary
29:23
forces okay so again all this happens
29:27
very quickly here in reality I told you
29:30
there are lots of lags and so on but
29:32
markets begin to anticipate what will
29:35
happen and
29:37
so so markets begin to anticipate so so
29:40
in the in the immediate output doesn't
29:43
collapse immediately anything and
29:44
inflation doesn't be doesn't collapse
29:47
immediately but markets realize that
29:49
there are Long Bar there lcks but but
29:52
there is a shock already so so it's
29:54
likely that these things will
29:56
happen and and and and it's likely that
29:59
this will happen and it's also likely
30:01
that the FED will react to
30:04
that what should be the reaction of the
30:06
FED if this stuff gets to be
30:12
persistent how do you get out of a shock
30:14
like that if you really want to go back
30:18
there you cut interest rates okay in the
30:21
case of the US they were hiking
30:23
interestate because we're deing with
30:25
dealing with high inflation this tells
30:27
you well you should slow down the pace
30:29
of hiking again they don't do it
30:32
immediately they meet next week but the
30:34
markets don't need to wait for the FED
30:36
they anticipate what the FED is likely
30:38
to do okay and they start betting on
30:40
that so let me show you next a bunch of
30:44
charts that show you that someone in the
30:47
market understand these mechanics okay a
30:49
lot of people because the prices are
30:51
moving exactly that
30:56
way so
30:58
this is the ER oh this is something this
31:02
is the one year ahead inflation
31:04
expectation as traded in the market it's
31:06
called inflation break even the one-ear
31:08
inflation break even so if you these
31:11
things are traded in the market and you
31:12
can trade expected inflation at all the
31:15
maturities you want so this is what the
31:18
market was expecting before this shock
31:21
you know infl we getting hotter and
31:22
hotter numbers so the economy was
31:24
inflation expected inflation as price in
31:27
the market Market was climbing okay one
31:31
year out and then the shock came and
31:34
look what happened to expect the
31:35
inflation boom it
31:39
collapse okay why is that well people
31:44
thought this shock that leads to that
31:48
okay that's what they thought this
31:50
bounce was markets got a little excited
31:53
yesterday it was a little risk on
31:55
environment today they lost all that
31:58
but but for a shock I'm going to tell
32:01
you about in a few minutes
32:03
but anyways but the point I wanted to
32:05
highlight is again expected inflation
32:08
was getting a little out of control and
32:11
then this x shock came the the Panic
32:13
shock and then immediately expected
32:15
inflation decline because people
32:17
anticipated something like this okay the
32:20
market anticipated something like that
32:23
what is
32:24
that this is the the
32:28
[Music]
32:29
um the markets expected next hike so
32:34
March 22nd the the FED will decide on
32:37
the increase in interest rate remember
32:39
the FED had decided as I said in the
32:41
previous lecture to go for a path of 50
32:43
basis points initially very high but
32:46
since a couple of meetings ago they
32:47
decided to slow down to 25 basis points
32:49
precisely because they want to wait and
32:51
see a bit what what a mess do we have I
32:53
mean there's long variable lacks they
32:55
have increased rates a lot and and so on
32:58
but so they had gone back to a pace of
33:00
25 so if you see in you know somewhere
33:02
here in in February 22nd if you ask the
33:05
market what what do you think will be
33:07
the next
33:08
hike there will be lots of answers
33:11
trades and so on but the the when I say
33:14
answers I mean what is price what is
33:17
traded this financial instrument the the
33:20
average answer was 30 basis points 30
33:23
basis point is that most of the people
33:25
thought that they were going to increase
33:27
the the interest rate by 25 basis points
33:29
and there were a few guys out there that
33:30
thought the FED doesn't increase the
33:32
interest rate by 33 basis points that's
33:34
25 50 75 okay so this 30 is meant that
33:39
almost everyone thought it was going to
33:41
be 25 but there were a few people that
33:42
were concerned that could be higher than
33:44
that what happened here we start getting
33:47
very hot numbers on inflation and so all
33:50
of a sudden the equilibrium changed
33:51
dramatically and we went to 45 which
33:54
means most people then thought in the
33:56
market that the next hike in in in on on
34:00
March 22nd was going to be 50 basis
34:02
points and a few people St stay at 25
34:05
that's the reason H this is not 0. five
34:09
but it was almost price in that point
34:12
when people say price in they're talking
34:13
about this what is the hike that price
34:15
in is this statistic look that's what
34:19
happened with
34:21
the Silicon Valley Bank event okay a
34:25
collapse in this thing now now is is
34:28
trading at around 13 basis points that
34:31
means most of the people think that the
34:34
Traders here think that there will be no
34:37
hike at all okay so a few days ago they
34:41
all thought there was going to be 50
34:43
basis point which is a big hike H and
34:45
now most people think there will be no
34:47
hike whatsoever but a few think that
34:49
it's going to be 25 me actually it's
34:52
almost 50/50 no I think today is a
34:54
little lower than that but it's almost
34:55
50/50 that is 25 or zero that's that's
34:59
what what it is but had you ask anyone
35:02
around here and certainly around here is
35:04
there any chance of zero and there would
35:06
be no one literally is that contract was
35:09
not traded okay well you see things
35:12
happen accidents happen so now that's
35:15
where where we are
35:17
at
35:20
now if this all last a week and and
35:23
everything gets resolved it doesn't have
35:26
a lot of macro iic consequences okay
35:29
it's just a little Panic you know some
35:31
people make money some people lose money
35:32
and so on but but but but this can be a
35:36
very problematic shock actually because
35:39
what you see here is that this is a size
35:42
this is Silicon Valley
35:44
Bank these are all the rest the banks
35:46
smaller than
35:48
that H it turns out that all these bank
35:51
at this moment are reshuffling their
35:53
portfolios they're becoming very
35:55
conservative because they don't want to
35:56
be exposed to similar risk they realized
35:58
the environment became very unfriendly
36:00
to you know that can be runs on banks in
36:03
any moment despite the fact that it's a
36:05
big policy package out there but people
36:06
are still withdrawing lots of deposits
36:08
from a small Banks small and Regional
36:10
Banks and they all deposi it in JP
36:12
Morgan you know the big Banks so there's
36:14
lots of deposits that despite the the
36:18
the the insurance the the the the the
36:21
blanket insurance that is implicit at
36:23
least at the moment lots of deposits
36:24
from these sectors are moving to these
36:26
major Banks here okay that's called it's
36:29
called a flight to
36:31
Quality now the problem of that for the
36:34
economy as a whole is that small Banks
36:37
and Regional Banks play a huge role in
36:40
in
36:41
lending okay I
36:45
think a little more than 50% for example
36:48
of the commercial and Industrial loans
36:50
are made by small Banks ER 80% of the
36:53
mortgages are given by a small Banks so
36:55
it so it has a big
36:58
potential consequence what I'm trying to
36:59
say is that X may stay high for quite a
37:01
bit of time okay and that's a
37:05
reason this is start there is
37:08
anticipation that this will have
37:09
macroeconomic consequences and as a
37:11
result of that that the FED will react
37:13
that inflation will change and all
37:17
that okay so that's where we were at on
37:20
Monday remember when we had the lecture
37:21
I was telling you more or less that
37:24
story ER what is this
37:28
you can read it there but it may not
37:30
mean M to much to you but I'm what I'm
37:32
highlighting is this this is pretty big
37:35
huh 35% decline this is an equity it's a
37:39
share so this is
37:41
the the value of the
37:44
equity of a pretty major Bank credit
37:47
Swiss okay so credit Swiss have been in
37:51
trouble for a while but today got into
37:54
really big trouble okay and and and you
37:58
saw sort of a massive collap collapse in
38:00
the equity shares in fact they stopped
38:02
trading for a while and so
38:04
on this thing here is H you know I
38:09
updated your slides many times today
38:12
because I began to look at this event
38:14
around here and then this thing kept
38:17
going then they stop kept going and so
38:18
and I I'm not sure where it's at now I
38:20
stopped at what time did I stop 9 in the
38:23
morning I was awake at 4:44 today so
38:26
they tell you this was this was a pretty
38:30
intense um but this what this is is the
38:33
credit default swaps on a credit swis
38:37
credit swap is whenever it's a bond
38:39
issued by a bank you can buy an
38:42
insurance on that Bond okay so it's so
38:44
so if the bond defaults on you you then
38:47
use the insurance and you get
38:50
paid so these things for banks normally
38:52
are very small numbers but for credit SS
38:56
bigger than for other big Banks because
38:57
I've been in in trouble for a while all
38:59
sort of trouble but look at that Spike
39:02
there I mean that's pretty big for these
39:03
kind of things you know it's not Lon yet
39:06
but
39:07
big so anyway that caused a little Panic
39:10
today
39:13
ER this is the the stock prices of the
39:16
main European Banks this is all today
39:20
yeah so look at this it was a little
39:23
rally yesterday and so on I mean this is
39:25
this is the decline as a result of the
39:28
US problem the Silicon Valley Banks then
39:31
a rally yesterday and then credit Swiss
39:34
happen and you has a big decline in h in
39:39
in all the major banks in in Europe the
39:43
US banks are also declining but but that
39:46
was bigger for the major
39:49
Banks the vix remember I told you last
39:51
last week last Monday about this
39:54
indicator of fear in the market which is
39:56
really the price put options I'm
39:58
simplifying things I mean protection for
40:01
for big declines on the equity Market H
40:04
again it began to spike very very
40:08
sharply as a result of this is what
40:10
happened with the US event then
40:12
yesterday we got a rally Rison type
40:15
thing and then today we got a new
40:18
event look at this I like this
40:22
picture what this is let me let me tell
40:24
you what the the the the the blue line
40:28
is the blue line is is the
40:32
market ER
40:35
expected federal funds rate at different
40:38
days in the future okay so you know
40:42
today the federal funds rate is is is
40:44
around four and a half and this is what
40:47
what the market expects okay so they
40:51
expected so they expected the FED to
40:53
continue to hike interest rate and to
40:56
reach a peak
40:58
ER around in June 14th in that meeting
41:02
of the order of five five 5.3% or so
41:05
that's that's what the average there
41:07
lots of dispersion there people betting
41:09
on 6% but that's the average that's what
41:11
people expected the yellow thinks it's
41:14
the number of hikes that you're likely
41:16
to see so you know you're likely to see
41:18
one hike in the next meeting another one
41:20
in the next meeting and another one in
41:22
the next meeting and then stop and begin
41:26
sort of cutting rates that's expect that
41:28
was expected path on Friday 10th was
41:31
Friday more or less around there maybe
41:33
Thursday I don't remember but anyway
41:35
that was expected path you see so still
41:38
hike rates reach a peak of five 5.3% and
41:42
still sort of pretty high interest rates
41:45
by the end of the year okay that was
41:48
expected
41:51
path that's the way it looks
41:54
now very different no now
41:58
people are expecting very small changes
42:00
now I show you it's like 13 basis points
42:02
what people expect okay the still people
42:05
expect sort of a hike but but small one
42:09
now they expect a peak to be sort of in
42:12
May and then the FED to start cutting
42:15
very aggressively to at the end of the
42:17
year end up with much lower rates than
42:20
today
42:22
okay so this is exactly what I was
42:24
telling you before the market is
42:25
anticipating that that we had a huge
42:28
contraction in the is because X went up
42:31
a lot ER the immediate consequences
42:35
that's going to be lower inflation yes
42:37
we have a problem because I mean if if
42:39
the US did not have a 5 and a half% of
42:42
inflation
42:44
today I can assure you that the FED
42:47
would have come out and said we cut the
42:48
rates right now the only reason they're
42:51
not cutting right now is because we have
42:53
a two problems we have the the financial
42:55
Panic on one side and we have the High
42:57
inflation on the other side so so they
42:59
have to balance these two
43:00
forces but but the expectation of the
43:03
market is that the balance of two forces
43:05
going to be dominated by the contraction
43:06
and aggregate demand much sooner than
43:09
people were expecting okay so that's
43:11
what the market is pricing at the moment
43:13
and what I'm saying is I was trying to
43:15
highlight is that this is very
43:16
consistent with
43:21
h with that okay it's just the market
43:25
looking ahead of what it's likely to
43:27
Happ happen it started from a situation
43:29
which is a little bit more complicated
43:31
again because we already had high
43:32
inflation well I do not know really I
43:35
mean it is on one end more complicated
43:39
because we have a problem of high
43:41
inflation on the other hand having high
43:45
inflation allows you to cut the real
43:47
interest rate much more aggressively
43:48
because if you bring the nominal
43:50
interest rate to zero and you have
43:51
inflation of 5% that allows you to cut
43:53
the real interest rate to minus 5% well
43:56
if you start with a situation where your
43:57
inflation is zero you don't have any
44:00
space to cut the real interest rate so
44:02
the FED can be very aggressive here and
44:04
the only reason is not being very very
44:06
aggressive they were very aggressive in
44:07
terms of supporting deposits and all
44:09
that but the the the the the they can be
44:13
very aggressive in terms of interest
44:15
rate cut if the need arises hopefully
44:17
won't but but they have a space because
44:19
we're starting from a much higher level
44:21
of inflation that
44:22
helps it it hurts in the sense that it
44:25
will delay the reaction but it helps in
44:28
the sense that they have much more space
44:30
for for
44:34
policy what is
44:39
this oh this is just interest one year
44:42
interest rates okay that that reflects
44:45
the the the previous picture as well
44:47
people you know one year out rates were
44:52
over
44:53
5% uh a few days ago and now are in the
44:57
low
44:58
force and this picture I kept updating
45:01
as you can see it was really dropping
45:06
fast that's a big change me look the one
45:09
year rate 60 basis points that's a big
45:14
change so that's where we're
45:17
at I'm from the next lecture I want to
45:19
start with growth but any questions
45:21
about this or
45:25
no okay I don't want to start growth now
45:27
in four minutes but uh so the set of
45:30
topics we're going to discuss from the
45:31
next lecture are very
45:33
different ER subject to not having any
45:36
major events if there is a major major
45:38
event I'm going to reffle things so we
45:40
can talk about financial panics and
45:43
things of that kind let's hope that it
45:45
can stick to the program and do
45:47
growth in the in the next week okay good
45:51
or would we do
— end of transcript —
Advertisement
Ad slot

More from MIT OpenCourseWare

Trending Transcripts

Disclaimer: This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by YouTube or Google LLC. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. Transcripts are sourced from publicly available captions on YouTube and remain the property of their original creators.