1 00:00:16,679 --> 00:00:20,519 Today we're going to look at the we're 2 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:23,240 going to start looking into the labor 3 00:00:20,519 --> 00:00:25,199 market. Now the labor market 4 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:26,879 is very interesting for a wide variety 5 00:00:25,199 --> 00:00:28,519 of reasons that we will not discuss in 6 00:00:26,879 --> 00:00:31,160 this course because it's not about labor 7 00:00:28,519 --> 00:00:33,479 economics, it's about macroeconomics. 8 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:36,119 But there are at least two reasons 9 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:38,879 why labor markets are very important in 10 00:00:36,119 --> 00:00:38,879 in macro. 11 00:00:39,079 --> 00:00:43,159 One is because things like an employment 12 00:00:42,119 --> 00:00:45,599 rate 13 00:00:43,159 --> 00:00:48,759 is an very important indicator of the 14 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:51,280 macroeconomic health 15 00:00:48,759 --> 00:00:52,839 of a country or an an economy. 16 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:55,160 And the second one 17 00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:57,240 which is quite relevant these days is 18 00:00:55,159 --> 00:00:58,759 that the inflation rate 19 00:00:57,240 --> 00:01:00,640 is 20 00:00:58,759 --> 00:01:03,759 one of the main drivers of the inflation 21 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:06,079 rate is what is going on in the in the 22 00:01:03,759 --> 00:01:09,000 in the labor market. And and we will try 23 00:01:06,079 --> 00:01:12,319 to understand this this mechanism 24 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:14,400 in the next couple of lectures. 25 00:01:12,319 --> 00:01:16,599 What you have there is the is the 26 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:19,080 inflation rate in the US and I'm I'm 27 00:01:16,599 --> 00:01:20,359 showing you this picture several times. 28 00:01:19,079 --> 00:01:22,200 You know, after going through a long 29 00:01:20,359 --> 00:01:24,439 period in which the 30 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:26,079 inflation rate hovered around 2%, you 31 00:01:24,439 --> 00:01:28,599 know, with cycles 32 00:01:26,079 --> 00:01:31,000 we are experiencing an episode of very 33 00:01:28,599 --> 00:01:32,079 high inflation. 34 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:34,640 Things are coming down, but they're 35 00:01:32,079 --> 00:01:36,640 still at extremely high levels, 6% or 36 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:40,200 so. And actually very recently these 37 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:40,200 numbers have picked up again a little. 38 00:01:40,519 --> 00:01:43,879 So that's very high 39 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:45,520 very high inflation rate, way too high 40 00:01:43,879 --> 00:01:49,159 for an economy like the US to feel 41 00:01:45,519 --> 00:01:51,959 comfortable with. And 42 00:01:49,159 --> 00:01:54,920 whenever you know 43 00:01:51,959 --> 00:01:57,879 some member of the FOMC comes out and 44 00:01:54,920 --> 00:02:00,240 explains why interest rates are so high 45 00:01:57,879 --> 00:02:01,839 at this moment it says and and and and 46 00:02:00,239 --> 00:02:03,879 explains why they are likely to remain 47 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:06,799 high for quite a while. They say, "Well, 48 00:02:03,879 --> 00:02:09,280 look, inflation is uncomfortably 49 00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:12,759 uncomfortably high at the high levels 50 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:14,640 and and labor market conditions are very 51 00:02:12,759 --> 00:02:17,599 tight." 52 00:02:14,639 --> 00:02:20,639 And that suggests that the inflation 53 00:02:17,599 --> 00:02:23,400 problem is not likely to go away in in 54 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:24,599 in in the near future. Okay? So that's 55 00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:26,960 something we need to understand in 56 00:02:24,599 --> 00:02:29,560 macro. Why is it that the labor market 57 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:31,719 being tight says anything about the 58 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:32,879 inflation rate, for example. Okay? And 59 00:02:31,719 --> 00:02:34,000 that's the kind of things we're going to 60 00:02:32,879 --> 00:02:36,280 discuss 61 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:37,439 in particular in the on on the Monday 62 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:38,960 lecture. 63 00:02:37,439 --> 00:02:42,840 Now today we're going to start with sort 64 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:45,360 of more basics of the of of of the 65 00:02:42,840 --> 00:02:47,200 of the labor market. 66 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:48,520 And 67 00:02:47,199 --> 00:02:50,639 and at the same time we're going to 68 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:52,120 begin a transition in the course in 69 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,319 which we have been focusing on things 70 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:55,360 that are 71 00:02:53,319 --> 00:02:58,400 in the very short run into things that 72 00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:59,520 take more time. Okay? Because many of 73 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,560 the things that we we're going to 74 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:04,280 discuss today are things that you're not 75 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:06,000 likely to see in in every single 76 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:09,280 quarter, but they are things that you're 77 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:11,319 likely to see over averages over, you 78 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:12,439 know, several quarters, several months. 79 00:03:11,319 --> 00:03:13,840 That's what we're going to look at 80 00:03:12,439 --> 00:03:16,520 today. 81 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:20,200 So remember let me just recap a little 82 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:20,200 bit what we have been doing up to now. 83 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:25,120 We have been looking at this ISLM model 84 00:03:23,319 --> 00:03:28,919 which is a great model. 85 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,920 It's it's a very good model 86 00:03:29,159 --> 00:03:33,840 to build on, but it's a very nice model 87 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:37,000 starting point to understand what 88 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:39,680 happens in a recession and what are the 89 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:41,639 what are what are the likely 90 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:43,040 what are the likely impact of the 91 00:03:41,639 --> 00:03:45,159 different macroeconomic policies, 92 00:03:43,039 --> 00:03:46,479 monetary policy, fiscal policy and so 93 00:03:45,159 --> 00:03:48,719 on. 94 00:03:46,479 --> 00:03:51,399 It is not such a great model 95 00:03:48,719 --> 00:03:51,400 once 96 00:03:51,479 --> 00:03:54,280 the aggregate supply side of the 97 00:03:52,919 --> 00:03:55,399 economy, something we have completely 98 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:57,800 ignored 99 00:03:55,400 --> 00:04:00,080 starts becoming binding. 100 00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:02,600 Okay? Remember that till now in the ISLM 101 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:05,280 model we had basically ISLM model we had 102 00:04:02,599 --> 00:04:07,199 two assumptions. 103 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:10,400 Related assumptions. One, prices were 104 00:04:07,199 --> 00:04:14,280 fully sticky. They didn't move at all. 105 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:15,840 Second, that output was aggregate demand 106 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:17,000 determined. So whatever aggregate demand 107 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:19,439 wanted 108 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:22,160 producers found a way to produce it at 109 00:04:19,439 --> 00:04:23,959 some given price. 110 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:27,600 That's that 111 00:04:23,959 --> 00:04:31,319 that combination is unlikely to happen 112 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:33,080 when for example, when 113 00:04:31,319 --> 00:04:34,839 firms are finding trouble finding new 114 00:04:33,079 --> 00:04:36,199 workers because, you know, there may be 115 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:38,799 more demand, more demand for these 116 00:04:36,199 --> 00:04:40,839 goods, but but the firm may find it hard 117 00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:42,520 to expand production. 118 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:44,719 And it's also highly likely that in a 119 00:04:42,519 --> 00:04:46,799 situation like that firms are going to 120 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:47,960 want to keep prices constant. At some 121 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:49,759 point they will kill you. Look, you you 122 00:04:47,959 --> 00:04:51,359 want to have lots of meals in my 123 00:04:49,759 --> 00:04:53,199 restaurant. I cannot find people to work 124 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:55,240 in my restaurant. I'll 125 00:04:53,199 --> 00:04:57,599 I'll I'll hide the prices so at least, 126 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:59,120 you know, fewer tables and I can manage 127 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:00,280 one way or the other. 128 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:01,639 So 129 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,519 we're going to start building a model 130 00:05:01,639 --> 00:05:04,120 that 131 00:05:02,519 --> 00:05:06,240 makes those takes those things into 132 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:07,040 consideration. What what is the impact 133 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,680 of 134 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:13,080 of a tight supply side of the economy on 135 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:16,160 on prices and and and how that starts 136 00:05:13,079 --> 00:05:19,039 affecting feeds back into equilibrium 137 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:21,439 output eventually. 138 00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:23,360 So the main thing I would say we're 139 00:05:21,439 --> 00:05:25,879 going to do really 140 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:27,759 relative to ISLM model in the next two 141 00:05:25,879 --> 00:05:30,040 three lectures is endogenize the 142 00:05:27,759 --> 00:05:31,319 inflation rate. Okay? We have kept 143 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:34,240 prices fixed. 144 00:05:31,319 --> 00:05:36,800 But now we want to endogenize. 145 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:37,439 And and the story of that endogenization 146 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:40,079 of 147 00:05:37,439 --> 00:05:41,199 of of inflation starts from the labor 148 00:05:40,079 --> 00:05:42,599 market. And that's the reason we're 149 00:05:41,199 --> 00:05:44,719 going to start looking at the labor 150 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:46,800 market today. Okay? 151 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:48,600 Now let me remind you a few things that 152 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:50,800 I think we discussed in the first 153 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:53,280 lecture or so or maybe second, I don't 154 00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:53,280 remember. 155 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:59,200 Let me give you a picture of the labor 156 00:05:56,560 --> 00:06:01,280 market and some variables 157 00:05:59,199 --> 00:06:02,240 important statistics of the labor market 158 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:03,759 that are 159 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:06,759 that that 160 00:06:03,759 --> 00:06:08,519 that that matter for for understanding 161 00:06:06,759 --> 00:06:10,839 inflation and so on. 162 00:06:08,519 --> 00:06:14,159 So this is a picture that's this is the 163 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:16,279 one that you have in the book of 164 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:17,600 the labor the the labor market. It's a 165 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:20,719 picture of the labor market at some 166 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:22,640 point in 2018. I don't know when. It's 167 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:25,880 it's a picture at one point. 168 00:06:22,639 --> 00:06:28,439 And that's at the time the US had about 169 00:06:25,879 --> 00:06:30,800 330 million people. 170 00:06:28,439 --> 00:06:32,519 That the non-institutional civilian 171 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:34,480 population, that is those people that in 172 00:06:32,519 --> 00:06:37,519 principle could work 173 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:40,640 were about 260 million. 174 00:06:37,519 --> 00:06:42,799 That excludes people under 16 years old, 175 00:06:40,639 --> 00:06:45,759 people that are incarcerated, people 176 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:47,639 that are in the in the armed forces. 177 00:06:45,759 --> 00:06:49,000 Those are excluded from 178 00:06:47,639 --> 00:06:50,519 that's the difference. That's the reason 179 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,199 you have such a big gap between these 180 00:06:50,519 --> 00:06:54,639 two numbers. Okay? 181 00:06:52,199 --> 00:06:57,479 Now out of these people that potentially 182 00:06:54,639 --> 00:06:59,439 could work some of them 183 00:06:57,480 --> 00:07:01,480 want to work and that's what we call the 184 00:06:59,439 --> 00:07:03,439 civilian labor force 185 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:04,840 and then some of them are out of the 186 00:07:03,439 --> 00:07:06,480 labor force. 187 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:07,839 Again, at one point in time doesn't mean 188 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,439 that these people are permanently out of 189 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:11,319 the labor force. They may be temporarily 190 00:07:09,439 --> 00:07:14,040 out of the labor force and so on. 191 00:07:11,319 --> 00:07:16,800 But but about, you know, we started with 192 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:18,360 about 330 million and by the time that 193 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:19,600 we look at the people that really want 194 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:21,840 to work 195 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:25,760 at that point when the picture was taken 196 00:07:21,839 --> 00:07:27,279 was about half of that, 162 million 197 00:07:25,759 --> 00:07:30,240 people. Okay? 198 00:07:27,279 --> 00:07:32,759 Now these 162 million people 199 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:35,280 the the great majority of them are 200 00:07:32,759 --> 00:07:36,240 typically employed. They have a job. 201 00:07:35,279 --> 00:07:38,479 Okay? 202 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:40,160 And then there's a group of people that 203 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:41,400 would want to have a job. That's the 204 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:43,800 reason they're part of the civilian 205 00:07:41,399 --> 00:07:45,959 labor force, but do not have one. 206 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:48,120 And that's about 6 million in that 207 00:07:45,959 --> 00:07:51,120 picture there. Okay? 208 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:54,199 So when you hear unemployment or the 209 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:56,120 unemployment rate you're really talking 210 00:07:54,199 --> 00:07:58,240 about these people here. And when you 211 00:07:56,120 --> 00:08:00,040 talk hear about the unemployment rate is 212 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:01,680 these people not divided over total 213 00:08:00,040 --> 00:08:04,280 population, but it's these people 214 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:06,199 divided by the civilian labor force. 215 00:08:04,279 --> 00:08:08,519 Okay? So that's the picture. 216 00:08:06,199 --> 00:08:08,519 The US. 217 00:08:08,639 --> 00:08:14,039 The most recent numbers we have about 218 00:08:10,439 --> 00:08:14,040 that kind of statistics is 219 00:08:14,199 --> 00:08:17,639 here you have them. I mean, the 220 00:08:15,759 --> 00:08:20,480 unemployment rate in the US today is 221 00:08:17,639 --> 00:08:21,639 about 3.4%. That's very low. I'll show 222 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,520 you 223 00:08:21,639 --> 00:08:26,360 historical data in a minute and I have 224 00:08:23,519 --> 00:08:30,319 shown you historical data in the recent 225 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:31,920 past. But this number is very very low. 226 00:08:30,319 --> 00:08:34,479 And 227 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:36,918 the change in the employment level 228 00:08:34,479 --> 00:08:39,080 in in this is for January 229 00:08:36,918 --> 00:08:42,519 was a reduction. This is this is not 230 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:45,480 rate. It's number of people that are 231 00:08:42,519 --> 00:08:46,559 that are that were no it's not number of 232 00:08:45,480 --> 00:08:48,320 people that were employed that are no 233 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:50,279 longer so. You look at the total stock 234 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:52,720 of unemployed in December and then you 235 00:08:50,279 --> 00:08:55,159 look at the total stock of unemployed in 236 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:59,519 January 2023. The difference between 237 00:08:55,159 --> 00:09:01,439 these two is 28,000 workers. So 28,000 238 00:08:59,519 --> 00:09:03,199 less workers are in the unemployment 239 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:05,200 pool. 240 00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:07,320 Now notice that how this number is made. 241 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:10,879 It's it's not it's not that that, you 242 00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:13,280 know, 25 28,000 people just gained a 243 00:09:10,879 --> 00:09:14,799 job. That's not what happened. 244 00:09:13,279 --> 00:09:16,000 What happens is 245 00:09:14,799 --> 00:09:18,879 first 246 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:22,000 employment 895,000 247 00:09:18,879 --> 00:09:23,679 and 84,000 people got a job. 248 00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:26,399 Much bigger number. 249 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:28,759 But also the civilian labor force went 250 00:09:26,399 --> 00:09:30,519 up by 866 251 00:09:28,759 --> 00:09:31,840 and 252 00:09:30,519 --> 00:09:34,919 and 253 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:35,800 thousand people. Okay? So if you go back 254 00:09:34,919 --> 00:09:37,879 to 255 00:09:35,799 --> 00:09:39,159 this picture, what you have in in 256 00:09:37,879 --> 00:09:40,679 January 257 00:09:39,159 --> 00:09:42,639 or the numbers reported in January, I do 258 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:47,399 not know which month they correspond to 259 00:09:42,639 --> 00:09:50,159 exactly is that yes, this this decline 260 00:09:47,399 --> 00:09:53,000 but that decline was made of 261 00:09:50,159 --> 00:09:54,199 a big increase in employment 262 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,360 together with a big increase in the 263 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:58,040 civilian labor force. Okay? 264 00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:59,960 So that must have been mostly movement 265 00:09:58,039 --> 00:10:01,679 out of the labor force and probably had 266 00:09:59,960 --> 00:10:05,080 that something to Well, I'm not going to 267 00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:05,079 get into that here, but 268 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:09,360 All these numbers are seasonally 269 00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:11,359 adjusted, so they're corrected relative 270 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:12,440 to what happens normally in January and 271 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:15,759 so on. 272 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:16,800 And COVID and weather can sort of derail 273 00:10:15,759 --> 00:10:18,120 a lot 274 00:10:16,799 --> 00:10:20,399 what happens in January, February. 275 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:21,639 Numbers tend to be very noisy. Since 276 00:10:20,399 --> 00:10:23,959 COVID, they have been very noisy because 277 00:10:21,639 --> 00:10:26,199 the seasonal adjustments are different. 278 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,560 And and also weather matters a lot in 279 00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:28,960 January, February and so on. So, you can 280 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:30,599 get pretty large fluctuations which are 281 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:32,560 really not that interesting to 282 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:34,240 macroeconomists, but anyways, those are 283 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:35,839 the numbers. 284 00:10:34,240 --> 00:10:38,360 You look at the civilian labor force 285 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:40,080 participation, then it was about 62%, 286 00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:42,800 62.5%. 287 00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:44,720 And the employment population ratio is 288 00:10:42,799 --> 00:10:47,399 of the order of 60%, okay? So, the 289 00:10:44,720 --> 00:10:48,440 employment population ratio is is just 290 00:10:47,399 --> 00:10:53,000 this 291 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:53,000 uh divided by total population, okay? 292 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:58,080 Um 293 00:10:55,799 --> 00:11:00,479 Those are the averages. The number of 294 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:03,200 unemployed in 2022, about 6 million 295 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:04,440 people. That's that's unemployed. 296 00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:06,160 Okay. 297 00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:08,200 So, there you have the unemployment 298 00:11:06,159 --> 00:11:09,959 rate, you know, and it moves as you 299 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:12,000 would expect it. It typically goes up in 300 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:13,800 recessions. Uh 301 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,200 the last sort of large recession we had 302 00:11:13,799 --> 00:11:17,359 big swings. 303 00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:19,000 Uh one thing that was interesting and we 304 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:21,320 couldn't quite understand what was going 305 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,519 on is as you notice right before COVID, 306 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:24,680 the unemployment rate had already 307 00:11:22,519 --> 00:11:26,240 declined to very low levels. 308 00:11:24,679 --> 00:11:27,439 And so, people were wondering whether 309 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:29,320 something we're going to talk about 310 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:31,360 later in the this lecture, whether the 311 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:34,080 natural rate of unemployment had changed 312 00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:34,080 for some reason. 313 00:11:34,279 --> 00:11:39,519 We'll come back to that. Then we got we 314 00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:41,520 got COVID, obviously a very 315 00:11:39,519 --> 00:11:43,559 recessionary shock initially, massive 316 00:11:41,519 --> 00:11:45,439 unemployment and so on. 317 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:47,759 But then it came back very quickly and 318 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:49,200 today we have record low levels of 319 00:11:47,759 --> 00:11:51,639 unemployment. We hadn't seen numbers 320 00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:53,280 like this since, you know, the '60s, 321 00:11:51,639 --> 00:11:55,919 uh really. Very low levels of 322 00:11:53,279 --> 00:11:57,838 unemployment. So, when when uh one of 323 00:11:55,919 --> 00:11:59,919 the things that that 324 00:11:57,839 --> 00:12:02,800 when you hear the FOMC members talking 325 00:11:59,919 --> 00:12:03,959 about the labor market being very tight, 326 00:12:02,799 --> 00:12:05,319 well, one of the things they're looking 327 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:07,440 at is this. One, there are other 328 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,800 statistics I'll show you, but but but 329 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:12,120 this is one of them. The unemployment 330 00:12:08,799 --> 00:12:12,120 rate is really, really low. 331 00:12:12,960 --> 00:12:17,440 Sometimes again, especially post-COVID 332 00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:20,200 because of movements in and out of the 333 00:12:17,440 --> 00:12:21,760 labor force, uh 334 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:24,160 the unemployment rate is not such a 335 00:12:21,759 --> 00:12:25,960 great statistic, not as reliable because 336 00:12:24,159 --> 00:12:27,838 many people left the labor force. So, 337 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:31,040 people look a lot at the 338 00:12:27,839 --> 00:12:33,680 employment rate, uh which is this is 339 00:12:31,039 --> 00:12:35,120 this is um this is 340 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:38,679 not the employment population ratio, 341 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:39,240 it's employment rate. So, employed over 342 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:41,559 uh 343 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:44,240 uh the non-civilian 344 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:44,239 population, no? 345 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:49,839 And that number, you can see we have 346 00:12:48,039 --> 00:12:51,360 discussed this before, 347 00:12:49,839 --> 00:12:52,800 was trending up here because of the 348 00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:55,039 increase in the labor participation of 349 00:12:52,799 --> 00:12:56,399 women, then it came down, had a lot to 350 00:12:55,039 --> 00:12:58,879 do with the students and things like 351 00:12:56,399 --> 00:13:01,399 that, uh systematically, but then it was 352 00:12:58,879 --> 00:13:04,120 climbing up enormously, it collapsed 353 00:13:01,399 --> 00:13:07,000 during COVID. That's mostly unemployment 354 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:08,560 and and and and and people out of the 355 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,480 labor force. 356 00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,919 Uh 357 00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:14,200 and then recovery, but the recovery has 358 00:13:11,919 --> 00:13:15,759 not picked up to back to the trend. See, 359 00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:18,600 we are back to sort of more or less the 360 00:13:15,759 --> 00:13:20,480 levels we had before COVID, but we're 361 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:21,879 certainly off the trend. 362 00:13:20,480 --> 00:13:23,440 And one of the reasons the labor markets 363 00:13:21,879 --> 00:13:26,200 are very tight is that is that we 364 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:28,880 haven't recovered sort of uh 365 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:31,720 the employment uh um 366 00:13:28,879 --> 00:13:33,559 rate that that we used to have, okay? 367 00:13:31,720 --> 00:13:36,160 This has to do with migration flows, 368 00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:38,679 with a variety of things, uh but that's 369 00:13:36,159 --> 00:13:41,319 that's the issue. 370 00:13:38,679 --> 00:13:42,919 Okay. So, that's that's sort of 371 00:13:41,320 --> 00:13:44,480 those are very static pictures of the 372 00:13:42,919 --> 00:13:46,159 labor market. What is the stock of 373 00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:47,639 unemployment at one point? What is the 374 00:13:46,159 --> 00:13:48,719 unemployment rate and so on and so 375 00:13:47,639 --> 00:13:50,879 forth? 376 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:53,080 But the truth is that labor markets are 377 00:13:50,879 --> 00:13:55,919 very dynamic, 378 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:58,440 especially in an economy like the US. 379 00:13:55,919 --> 00:14:00,079 The flows are very large. So, what I 380 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:02,280 have there, and I don't know for which 381 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:04,120 date, this is in the book, but the 382 00:14:02,279 --> 00:14:06,039 pictures look more or less the same for 383 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:08,839 the point I want to make. 384 00:14:06,039 --> 00:14:09,519 This is monthly labor flow flows. And 385 00:14:08,839 --> 00:14:11,000 this 386 00:14:09,519 --> 00:14:13,879 this happened in some month, I don't 387 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:16,200 care, 2018 at some point. 388 00:14:13,879 --> 00:14:17,559 Look at what happened there. 389 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:20,079 You have this is we were talking about 390 00:14:17,559 --> 00:14:22,399 the stocks recently. So, employment in 391 00:14:20,078 --> 00:14:25,679 that month was of the order of 132 392 00:14:22,399 --> 00:14:27,159 million uh dollars, 132 million people, 393 00:14:25,679 --> 00:14:29,519 okay? 394 00:14:27,159 --> 00:14:32,399 Out of the labor force, about 79 million 395 00:14:29,519 --> 00:14:33,879 people. Unemployed, about 8.6 million. 396 00:14:32,399 --> 00:14:35,319 That's those were the stocks. Those were 397 00:14:33,879 --> 00:14:37,720 the type of numbers I was showing you 398 00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:40,000 before, okay? 399 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:42,360 But look at these arrows. 400 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:45,159 These are flows. So, in every single 401 00:14:42,360 --> 00:14:46,639 month, you see in the US about 3 million 402 00:14:45,159 --> 00:14:50,120 people that move from one job to 403 00:14:46,639 --> 00:14:52,879 another. So, employment to employment. 404 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:55,919 You see about 1.8 million that move from 405 00:14:52,879 --> 00:14:58,679 employment to unemployment. 406 00:14:55,919 --> 00:15:01,078 And about 2 million people that move 407 00:14:58,679 --> 00:15:02,719 from unemployment to employment. Large 408 00:15:01,078 --> 00:15:04,399 flows. 409 00:15:02,720 --> 00:15:05,959 Not only so, not everything goes from 410 00:15:04,399 --> 00:15:07,559 unemployment to employment. There are 411 00:15:05,958 --> 00:15:09,519 people that are also moving out of the 412 00:15:07,559 --> 00:15:12,439 labor force and into the labor force, 413 00:15:09,519 --> 00:15:14,919 into unemployment, into employment. Here 414 00:15:12,440 --> 00:15:16,520 in this particular case, out the flow 415 00:15:14,919 --> 00:15:18,919 out of the labor force into employment 416 00:15:16,519 --> 00:15:21,279 is 3.4 million. 417 00:15:18,919 --> 00:15:22,759 Flows from employment without going 418 00:15:21,279 --> 00:15:25,360 through unemployment to out of the labor 419 00:15:22,759 --> 00:15:27,519 force, 3.7 million. 420 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:29,639 Okay. During COVID, there was a this 421 00:15:27,519 --> 00:15:31,720 must have been a very thick arrow. 422 00:15:29,639 --> 00:15:34,720 Lots of people move out from employment 423 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:36,440 to out of the labor force, okay? 424 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:38,079 And and one of the problems the economy 425 00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:40,520 has had in the recovery on the on the 426 00:15:38,078 --> 00:15:42,559 labor market side is that this arrow 427 00:15:40,519 --> 00:15:43,639 hasn't been as strong as we would want 428 00:15:42,559 --> 00:15:44,359 it. 429 00:15:43,639 --> 00:15:46,120 Okay. 430 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:48,120 This arrow, or this arrow for that 431 00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:49,519 matter of fact, people coming coming out 432 00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:51,039 of the labor force into unemployment, 433 00:15:49,519 --> 00:15:52,559 that's also big flow. 434 00:15:51,039 --> 00:15:53,759 Sometimes people are not working and 435 00:15:52,559 --> 00:15:55,359 then they decide that, you know, they 436 00:15:53,759 --> 00:15:56,958 run out of unemployment insurance or 437 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:58,600 something like that, and so they decide 438 00:15:56,958 --> 00:15:59,559 to start looking, you know, and they 439 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:01,879 move 440 00:15:59,559 --> 00:16:02,559 into unemployment here, 441 00:16:01,879 --> 00:16:05,120 okay? 442 00:16:02,559 --> 00:16:07,039 Or or they run out of savings and and 443 00:16:05,120 --> 00:16:08,639 they have to come back and they may not 444 00:16:07,039 --> 00:16:09,879 find a job initially. They have to go 445 00:16:08,639 --> 00:16:11,000 through unemployment, 446 00:16:09,879 --> 00:16:13,439 okay? 447 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:14,799 So, the point is that these flows are 448 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:17,040 very large. 449 00:16:14,799 --> 00:16:19,399 And and the 450 00:16:17,039 --> 00:16:20,319 and these flows matter a lot 451 00:16:19,399 --> 00:16:21,759 uh 452 00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:24,400 for for the kind of things we want to 453 00:16:21,759 --> 00:16:26,078 talk about in in this course. 454 00:16:24,399 --> 00:16:26,838 Look at what we have here. 455 00:16:26,078 --> 00:16:28,799 Uh 456 00:16:26,839 --> 00:16:32,079 the red line is the unemployment rate 457 00:16:28,799 --> 00:16:34,679 and it's measured on the left axis. 458 00:16:32,078 --> 00:16:37,159 And what we have here in the blue line 459 00:16:34,679 --> 00:16:39,719 is measured in a in an inverse scale. 460 00:16:37,159 --> 00:16:41,319 Look at this this goes up 461 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:43,399 as you go down. 462 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:45,240 Is is the 463 00:16:43,399 --> 00:16:47,559 percentage of employed unemployed 464 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:49,000 workers becoming employed. 465 00:16:47,559 --> 00:16:50,399 Okay. 466 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:51,958 So, it's the job finding rate from 467 00:16:50,399 --> 00:16:53,039 unemployment. So, you have unemployed 468 00:16:51,958 --> 00:16:55,279 people 469 00:16:53,039 --> 00:16:56,559 and they will be finding jobs. They will 470 00:16:55,279 --> 00:16:58,120 be looking for jobs and they will be 471 00:16:56,559 --> 00:17:00,319 finding jobs. 472 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:01,519 This number here, this blue line here, 473 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:03,839 shows you 474 00:17:01,519 --> 00:17:05,319 uh the likelihood that they'll find a 475 00:17:03,839 --> 00:17:06,959 job 476 00:17:05,319 --> 00:17:08,720 in inverted scale, 477 00:17:06,959 --> 00:17:10,120 okay? So, 478 00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:12,759 what do you what correlation do you 479 00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:12,759 notice there? 480 00:17:19,439 --> 00:17:24,240 It's very tight. 481 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:26,838 Yeah. As the percent of people 482 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:29,079 um that get a job each month is smaller, 483 00:17:26,838 --> 00:17:31,039 there's more people without a job. 484 00:17:29,079 --> 00:17:33,960 Exactly. That means when the 485 00:17:31,039 --> 00:17:35,759 unemployment rate is high, 486 00:17:33,960 --> 00:17:37,600 it is harder for unemployed workers to 487 00:17:35,759 --> 00:17:40,039 find a job. 488 00:17:37,599 --> 00:17:41,599 Or another way of an direct implication 489 00:17:40,039 --> 00:17:43,039 of that is that a typical unemployed 490 00:17:41,599 --> 00:17:44,678 worker will spend more time in 491 00:17:43,039 --> 00:17:46,599 unemployment because they're going to be 492 00:17:44,679 --> 00:17:48,000 looking for jobs and it's more 493 00:17:46,599 --> 00:17:49,319 it's harder to get a job, so you're 494 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:51,319 going to be looking for a job for a 495 00:17:49,319 --> 00:17:53,678 longer period of time. 496 00:17:51,319 --> 00:17:54,678 Why are we talking about these things? 497 00:17:53,679 --> 00:17:56,560 Well, 498 00:17:54,679 --> 00:17:57,120 because of this type of 499 00:17:56,559 --> 00:17:59,319 uh 500 00:17:57,119 --> 00:18:02,319 reasons. Well, this means that when 501 00:17:59,319 --> 00:18:04,960 unemployment is high, workers are worse 502 00:18:02,319 --> 00:18:06,159 off in at least two ways. 503 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:08,559 And there are two ways that are going to 504 00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:09,920 be important for what I'll say next. 505 00:18:08,559 --> 00:18:11,319 One 506 00:18:09,920 --> 00:18:12,679 is that the employed workers face a 507 00:18:11,319 --> 00:18:14,240 higher probability of losing a job. 508 00:18:12,679 --> 00:18:15,880 That's what happens when unemployment is 509 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:17,160 the reason unemployment gets to be high 510 00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:19,520 is because 511 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:22,960 firms are firing workers and so on and 512 00:18:19,519 --> 00:18:25,519 so forth, no? And so 513 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:27,720 so so when unemployment is high, the 514 00:18:25,519 --> 00:18:30,039 first thing the workers know is that 515 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:33,679 it's very likely they'll lose their job, 516 00:18:30,039 --> 00:18:35,079 more likely that they'll lose their job. 517 00:18:33,679 --> 00:18:37,519 But the second channel, which is what 518 00:18:35,079 --> 00:18:39,000 this picture highlights here, is that is 519 00:18:37,519 --> 00:18:40,679 that if you fall on employment, it's 520 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:42,720 going to take a it's going to be a lot 521 00:18:40,679 --> 00:18:44,960 harder to get out of unemployment, 522 00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:46,640 okay? So, when unemployment is high is 523 00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:49,120 high, it's scary for workers for two 524 00:18:46,640 --> 00:18:50,560 reasons. Once, you're more likely to 525 00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:52,119 lose a job because it's capturing 526 00:18:50,559 --> 00:18:54,319 recessionary conditions and so on in the 527 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:55,479 economy, but second, if you end up in 528 00:18:54,319 --> 00:18:57,720 unemployment, it's going to be hard to 529 00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:59,559 get out of it, 530 00:18:57,720 --> 00:19:02,559 okay? 531 00:18:59,559 --> 00:19:05,799 And and later on this unemployment rate 532 00:19:02,559 --> 00:19:07,319 is going to show up in wage bargaining 533 00:19:05,799 --> 00:19:09,918 and the main reason it's going to show 534 00:19:07,319 --> 00:19:12,000 up is of this kind. 535 00:19:09,919 --> 00:19:14,960 And also think about the other side. 536 00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:16,839 When there's bargaining, there's two 537 00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:18,720 There's going to be firm and workers. 538 00:19:16,839 --> 00:19:20,519 From the firm point of view, 539 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:23,240 if there's a lot of unemployment, do you 540 00:19:20,519 --> 00:19:24,720 think it's hard or or or or or easy to 541 00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:26,919 find a worker? 542 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:30,000 If you replace a worker that decides to 543 00:19:26,919 --> 00:19:30,000 leave for whatever reason, 544 00:19:30,079 --> 00:19:35,279 Easy, no? You have lots of people to 545 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:37,679 choose from, so it becomes easy. So, 546 00:19:35,279 --> 00:19:39,079 unemployment is high, workers are more 547 00:19:37,679 --> 00:19:41,840 scared. 548 00:19:39,079 --> 00:19:43,319 If they get out, it it is they're scared 549 00:19:41,839 --> 00:19:46,158 of losing their job. If they get out, 550 00:19:43,319 --> 00:19:47,799 it's it it's it's hard to get a job. And 551 00:19:46,159 --> 00:19:49,560 on the other side, the firms for the 552 00:19:47,799 --> 00:19:51,158 firms, it's not that they're scared to 553 00:19:49,559 --> 00:19:53,639 lose a worker because it's pretty fairly 554 00:19:51,159 --> 00:19:55,960 easy to replace that worker. 555 00:19:53,640 --> 00:19:57,520 Today, firms are very worried about 556 00:19:55,960 --> 00:19:59,160 losing their workers. In some sectors, 557 00:19:57,519 --> 00:20:01,200 no, in some sectors are getting rid of 558 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:03,440 workers, but but if you run a 559 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:05,880 restaurant, you're very scared of losing 560 00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:07,160 your your your workers, you know, 561 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:09,680 because it's going to be very difficult 562 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:12,519 to find a replacement for that worker. 563 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:16,560 So, surprise, surprise, wages in that 564 00:20:12,519 --> 00:20:18,039 industry are going up a lot, okay? 565 00:20:16,559 --> 00:20:20,799 We're going to get there. 566 00:20:18,039 --> 00:20:22,599 So, that's what comes in wage 567 00:20:20,799 --> 00:20:24,159 determination. Look at the what I'm what 568 00:20:22,599 --> 00:20:25,839 I'm trying to build here. I'm starting 569 00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:27,920 from telling you stories about the labor 570 00:20:25,839 --> 00:20:29,679 market, what things are important for 571 00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:30,960 workers, and so on. 572 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:33,240 Now, I'm going to get into wage 573 00:20:30,960 --> 00:20:34,960 determination, and obviously this 574 00:20:33,240 --> 00:20:37,079 variables I talked about are going to be 575 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,680 important in this wage determination, 576 00:20:37,079 --> 00:20:41,199 but my ultimate goal is to talk about 577 00:20:38,680 --> 00:20:42,320 inflation. So, the next step, so I'm 578 00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:44,039 going to talk about wage determination 579 00:20:42,319 --> 00:20:46,279 here, and then we're going to talk about 580 00:20:44,039 --> 00:20:49,000 prices, and there we're going to be one 581 00:20:46,279 --> 00:20:50,519 step closer to talking about inflation, 582 00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:54,359 okay? So, let's go through the 583 00:20:50,519 --> 00:20:55,639 intermediate step, wage determination. 584 00:20:54,359 --> 00:20:57,399 Uh 585 00:20:55,640 --> 00:21:00,360 So, just to give you a little 586 00:20:57,400 --> 00:21:02,000 background, you know, sometimes 587 00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:04,159 uh wages are set by collective 588 00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:05,279 bargaining, unions 589 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:07,400 in particular. 590 00:21:05,279 --> 00:21:08,279 Now, in the US, unions are not a big 591 00:21:07,400 --> 00:21:09,759 thing. 592 00:21:08,279 --> 00:21:10,960 Okay? They were a much bigger thing many 593 00:21:09,759 --> 00:21:13,039 years back. 594 00:21:10,960 --> 00:21:14,319 They aren't today. 595 00:21:13,039 --> 00:21:16,039 Um 596 00:21:14,319 --> 00:21:20,319 in other economies, they are a big 597 00:21:16,039 --> 00:21:21,440 thing, okay? Japan, in Europe. 598 00:21:20,319 --> 00:21:23,079 Uh 599 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:24,600 and the unions can happen at different 600 00:21:23,079 --> 00:21:26,960 levels of aggregation, at the level of 601 00:21:24,599 --> 00:21:29,199 the firm, at the level of the sector, 602 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:31,680 and and and and 603 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:33,920 and you name it. 604 00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:35,920 In general, regardless of the level you 605 00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:38,320 of unionization you have 606 00:21:35,920 --> 00:21:40,080 uh in a country or in a sector, 607 00:21:38,319 --> 00:21:41,559 the higher the skill needed to a job, 608 00:21:40,079 --> 00:21:43,839 the more likely this other bargaining 609 00:21:41,559 --> 00:21:46,639 takes place between an individual 610 00:21:43,839 --> 00:21:48,279 between an employer and an individual 611 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:50,600 rather than a union, okay? Because it's 612 00:21:48,279 --> 00:21:52,799 sort of much more idiosyncratic 613 00:21:50,599 --> 00:21:54,919 and customized, and so on. 614 00:21:52,799 --> 00:21:58,639 But, either way, regardless of whether 615 00:21:54,920 --> 00:22:00,120 uh whether uh uh wages are set 616 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:01,679 at a collective level or at at the 617 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:04,959 individual level, 618 00:22:01,679 --> 00:22:08,880 the main macroeconomic drivers 619 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:09,840 of uh wages are similar across both of 620 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:11,040 them. 621 00:22:09,839 --> 00:22:13,119 Of course, the particulars are going to 622 00:22:11,039 --> 00:22:15,639 be different, even the dynamics can be 623 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:18,199 different, and so on. But, the big 624 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:19,720 drivers, the big macro drivers 625 00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:21,319 are similar, regardless of the 626 00:22:19,720 --> 00:22:23,039 bargaining mode you have at the level at 627 00:22:21,319 --> 00:22:24,839 which it happens, and so on. And those 628 00:22:23,039 --> 00:22:27,240 are the things we're going to highlight 629 00:22:24,839 --> 00:22:27,240 here. 630 00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:33,280 So, 631 00:22:29,799 --> 00:22:36,839 a fact of life is that workers' wages 632 00:22:33,279 --> 00:22:38,319 typically exceed the reservation wage. 633 00:22:36,839 --> 00:22:40,879 Now, what does it mean the reservation 634 00:22:38,319 --> 00:22:42,279 wage? The reservation wage is a wage 635 00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:43,840 that would leave you indifferent between 636 00:22:42,279 --> 00:22:48,000 employed or unemployed. Doesn't mean 637 00:22:43,839 --> 00:22:49,399 there's a nice wage, anything. But, 638 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:50,519 I mean, that's and certainly doesn't 639 00:22:49,400 --> 00:22:52,040 mean that you wouldn't prefer to have to 640 00:22:50,519 --> 00:22:54,000 have a higher wage. 641 00:22:52,039 --> 00:22:55,480 But, it tells you that, look, at that 642 00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:57,279 wage, you'd rather be employed than 643 00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:59,519 unemployed. 644 00:22:57,279 --> 00:23:00,960 Okay? And there's a wait long list of 645 00:22:59,519 --> 00:23:03,119 reasons why 646 00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:04,480 that ends up being the equilibrium type 647 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:05,439 wage, and I'm not going to discuss them 648 00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:06,360 here, 649 00:23:05,440 --> 00:23:08,360 but 650 00:23:06,359 --> 00:23:10,359 take it as a fact for now. 651 00:23:08,359 --> 00:23:12,199 Okay? So, that is 652 00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:13,479 workers prefer to be employed. 653 00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:15,279 They may take the risk of becoming 654 00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:18,519 unemployed, but they typically prefer to 655 00:23:15,279 --> 00:23:18,519 be employed. 656 00:23:18,559 --> 00:23:22,519 Um 657 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:23,679 Now, wages, and this is where it becomes 658 00:23:22,519 --> 00:23:25,799 uh 659 00:23:23,679 --> 00:23:27,800 uh important for interesting for us in 660 00:23:25,799 --> 00:23:32,159 macro, is 661 00:23:27,799 --> 00:23:34,559 the wages that are finally set depend 662 00:23:32,160 --> 00:23:36,920 on labor market conditions. 663 00:23:34,559 --> 00:23:39,759 So, very clearly, the lower is the 664 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:41,759 unemployment rate, the higher the wages 665 00:23:39,759 --> 00:23:43,559 will tend to be. Okay? And you're seeing 666 00:23:41,759 --> 00:23:45,839 it now. The unemployment rate is very 667 00:23:43,559 --> 00:23:46,919 low, wages are rising a lot. 668 00:23:45,839 --> 00:23:50,000 Okay? 669 00:23:46,920 --> 00:23:52,080 And workers' bargaining power depends on 670 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:53,640 this again. There's a huge literature on 671 00:23:52,079 --> 00:23:55,919 these things, I'm just compressing it 672 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:58,400 into 673 00:23:55,920 --> 00:24:00,360 as the very minimums. 674 00:23:58,400 --> 00:24:02,240 Uh the bargaining power of a worker is a 675 00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:03,799 thing that we already discussed. 676 00:24:02,240 --> 00:24:05,920 Well, it depends on how costly for the 677 00:24:03,799 --> 00:24:07,359 firm to find a worker. So, obviously, if 678 00:24:05,920 --> 00:24:08,960 unemployment is very high, it's very 679 00:24:07,359 --> 00:24:10,639 easy for firms to buy a work find a 680 00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,240 worker. That's not good for the 681 00:24:10,640 --> 00:24:13,960 bargaining for of a work If you want to 682 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:15,679 bargain with your employer, 683 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:16,799 and there's lots of people like you out 684 00:24:15,679 --> 00:24:18,280 there, 685 00:24:16,799 --> 00:24:20,159 uh you're not going to have a lot of 686 00:24:18,279 --> 00:24:21,279 bargaining power. So, it's unlikely that 687 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:22,960 you're going to come up with a very high 688 00:24:21,279 --> 00:24:23,839 wage, okay? 689 00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:25,440 Uh 690 00:24:23,839 --> 00:24:26,879 and it's also the other side of it is 691 00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:28,720 how hard it is for workers to find 692 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:29,840 another job if they were to leave the 693 00:24:28,720 --> 00:24:31,160 firms. I mean, if you know that there 694 00:24:29,839 --> 00:24:34,279 are lots of jobs like the one you 695 00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:37,360 currently have out there which are not 696 00:24:34,279 --> 00:24:38,279 occupied, so there's empty vacant jobs, 697 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,159 then you're probably going to have a 698 00:24:38,279 --> 00:24:41,559 much stronger hand with your employer 699 00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:43,120 because you can say, "Okay, if you don't 700 00:24:41,559 --> 00:24:44,759 pay me what I want, I move to the next 701 00:24:43,119 --> 00:24:46,199 door." Okay? 702 00:24:44,759 --> 00:24:47,879 And in terms of the macroeconomic 703 00:24:46,200 --> 00:24:49,720 variables we care about, 704 00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:52,720 a situation like that is very likely to 705 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:53,640 happen when unemployment is very low. 706 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:55,880 Okay? 707 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:57,080 Because that means that other 708 00:24:55,880 --> 00:24:59,240 jobs 709 00:24:57,079 --> 00:25:00,399 are are unlikely to be filled 710 00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:01,679 because, you know, there there are lots 711 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:03,759 of people looking for things, but it's 712 00:25:01,679 --> 00:25:06,280 difficult for the firms to find 713 00:25:03,759 --> 00:25:08,279 the workers, and therefore 714 00:25:06,279 --> 00:25:09,639 you're going to be a lot more attractive 715 00:25:08,279 --> 00:25:11,440 to that 716 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:13,480 labor market. 717 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:15,759 So, in summary, 718 00:25:13,480 --> 00:25:19,200 at the aggregate level, 719 00:25:15,759 --> 00:25:20,920 we can write a wage-setting equation 720 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:22,440 of this form. 721 00:25:20,920 --> 00:25:23,800 So, the wage, and this is the nominal 722 00:25:22,440 --> 00:25:24,480 wage, 723 00:25:23,799 --> 00:25:26,879 uh 724 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:30,079 can be written as an increasing function 725 00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:32,760 of expected price. 726 00:25:30,079 --> 00:25:34,159 Meaning, wages are not set in most 727 00:25:32,759 --> 00:25:35,799 professions, they're not set second 728 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:37,240 second by second. You set them you know, 729 00:25:35,799 --> 00:25:40,159 you bargain for a wage, and so on, and 730 00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:41,559 that thing it sticks for a year or so, 731 00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:43,080 at least. 732 00:25:41,559 --> 00:25:45,799 Some Okay? 733 00:25:43,079 --> 00:25:47,960 Well, obviously, if you expect this 734 00:25:45,799 --> 00:25:49,879 inflation is zero, 735 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:51,679 you know, you're going to demand a wage 736 00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:54,240 that is more or less 737 00:25:51,679 --> 00:25:56,720 what you need today. 738 00:25:54,240 --> 00:25:58,440 If inflation is 10%, 739 00:25:56,720 --> 00:26:00,839 you you say, "Well, I'm going to have to 740 00:25:58,440 --> 00:26:02,440 demand a higher wage because I have to 741 00:26:00,839 --> 00:26:04,480 live with this wage for a year, and 742 00:26:02,440 --> 00:26:07,080 prices are going to be rising while 743 00:26:04,480 --> 00:26:08,559 while I have this wage." And so so, if 744 00:26:07,079 --> 00:26:11,199 they expect lots of inflation, if they 745 00:26:08,559 --> 00:26:12,279 expect prices to be high in the future, 746 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:14,640 they're going to ask for a higher 747 00:26:12,279 --> 00:26:16,720 nominal wage today because I'm going to 748 00:26:14,640 --> 00:26:18,480 have to live with that wage on average 749 00:26:16,720 --> 00:26:21,480 for the next uh 750 00:26:18,480 --> 00:26:22,559 year or so, okay? So, that's the first 751 00:26:21,480 --> 00:26:24,240 thing, and it's going to play an 752 00:26:22,559 --> 00:26:26,759 important role. It says wages are an 753 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:28,880 increasing function on the price level 754 00:26:26,759 --> 00:26:30,879 workers expect. They expect a high price 755 00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:32,640 level in the future or during the life 756 00:26:30,880 --> 00:26:35,000 of the wage contract, then they 757 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:36,480 obviously going to demand a higher wage. 758 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:38,400 Other things equal. 759 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:40,759 What are other things? Well, the the 760 00:26:38,400 --> 00:26:42,880 arguments of this function here. 761 00:26:40,759 --> 00:26:45,000 Unemployment. 762 00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:47,640 If I'm employed for any given expected 763 00:26:45,000 --> 00:26:49,079 price, if the unemployment rate is high, 764 00:26:47,640 --> 00:26:50,120 workers are going to demand a lower 765 00:26:49,079 --> 00:26:52,759 wage. 766 00:26:50,119 --> 00:26:52,759 Why is that? 767 00:26:57,480 --> 00:27:00,720 Because it's going to be um harder for 768 00:26:59,279 --> 00:27:02,200 them to find a job, so they have less 769 00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:04,440 bargaining power. They have less 770 00:27:02,200 --> 00:27:06,000 bargaining power, exactly, okay? 771 00:27:04,440 --> 00:27:07,920 Um so, they're going to like they're 772 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:10,400 going to demand a lower wage. 773 00:27:07,920 --> 00:27:13,279 This variable Z here 774 00:27:10,400 --> 00:27:15,440 is a catch-all variable for 775 00:27:13,279 --> 00:27:17,559 a a strength workers' strength in the 776 00:27:15,440 --> 00:27:19,480 bargaining position situation, something 777 00:27:17,559 --> 00:27:20,039 like that. So, 778 00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:22,480 uh 779 00:27:20,039 --> 00:27:25,000 for example, uh 780 00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:26,920 this is things like uh employment 781 00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:28,160 protection laws. 782 00:27:26,920 --> 00:27:30,160 Okay? 783 00:27:28,160 --> 00:27:33,400 Firing costs. If it is difficult to fire 784 00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:35,679 someone, the Z will tend to be high. So, 785 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:38,200 this only tells you that given the level 786 00:27:35,679 --> 00:27:40,800 of unemployment, if it is very hard to 787 00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:43,160 fire someone, wages workers are going to 788 00:27:40,799 --> 00:27:45,240 be willing to they're going to they're 789 00:27:43,160 --> 00:27:46,480 very likely to demand a higher wage. No, 790 00:27:45,240 --> 00:27:48,319 it's hard 791 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:51,200 it's hard for you to fire me, 792 00:27:48,319 --> 00:27:53,599 I'm going to bargain harder for my wage, 793 00:27:51,200 --> 00:27:56,360 and this type of institutions 794 00:27:53,599 --> 00:27:59,039 institutional factors play a huge role 795 00:27:56,359 --> 00:28:01,279 in Europe, much more than in the US. 796 00:27:59,039 --> 00:28:01,279 Okay? 797 00:28:01,599 --> 00:28:04,359 Good. 798 00:28:02,319 --> 00:28:05,519 But, as a matter of a definition, we're 799 00:28:04,359 --> 00:28:07,959 going to say 800 00:28:05,519 --> 00:28:09,960 an increase in Z is Z is something that 801 00:28:07,960 --> 00:28:11,679 increases the bargaining power of 802 00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:13,600 workers. Okay? 803 00:28:11,679 --> 00:28:15,600 And therefore, for any given level of 804 00:28:13,599 --> 00:28:17,000 unemployment and expected prices, 805 00:28:15,599 --> 00:28:19,039 they're going to lead to a higher wage 806 00:28:17,000 --> 00:28:21,119 demand. This is the wage This is the 807 00:28:19,039 --> 00:28:22,599 workers' demand in a wage. 808 00:28:21,119 --> 00:28:24,119 We have to figure out what happens in 809 00:28:22,599 --> 00:28:28,000 equilibrium, but this is what the 810 00:28:24,119 --> 00:28:28,000 workers are demanding. Okay? 811 00:28:29,000 --> 00:28:33,519 Is it clear what we have here? 812 00:28:31,359 --> 00:28:33,519 Good. 813 00:28:36,200 --> 00:28:40,319 So, let's now move to the other side. 814 00:28:38,640 --> 00:28:42,440 Okay? So, that's one side of the 815 00:28:40,319 --> 00:28:44,079 scissor. We have the workers, and they 816 00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:45,679 given certain 817 00:28:44,079 --> 00:28:47,480 macroeconomic conditions summarized by 818 00:28:45,679 --> 00:28:50,159 the unemployment rate and expected 819 00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:51,919 prices, they demand certain wages. 820 00:28:50,159 --> 00:28:53,760 Now, we can't find equilibrium wage 821 00:28:51,919 --> 00:28:56,000 until we don't see the other side, what 822 00:28:53,759 --> 00:28:58,559 firms are willing to pay, and so on. So, 823 00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:00,400 we need to explore this other side. 824 00:28:58,559 --> 00:29:01,839 And the starting point of that other 825 00:29:00,400 --> 00:29:04,600 side 826 00:29:01,839 --> 00:29:05,839 is the production function, meaning 827 00:29:04,599 --> 00:29:07,439 you know, 828 00:29:05,839 --> 00:29:09,119 uh 829 00:29:07,440 --> 00:29:10,440 firms are going to end up setting prices 830 00:29:09,119 --> 00:29:12,839 for goods, 831 00:29:10,440 --> 00:29:14,000 but producing those goods will take 832 00:29:12,839 --> 00:29:16,119 factors of production. They're going to 833 00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:17,919 have to use something 834 00:29:16,119 --> 00:29:19,399 uh to produce that. 835 00:29:17,919 --> 00:29:20,960 And the cost of that something will 836 00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:23,200 determine, importantly, what is the 837 00:29:20,960 --> 00:29:25,759 price they end up charging. 838 00:29:23,200 --> 00:29:27,360 I'm going to simplify things a lot here. 839 00:29:25,759 --> 00:29:30,000 Uh I'm going to assume the production 840 00:29:27,359 --> 00:29:31,559 function is first linear and linear only 841 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:32,679 on labor, so no other factors of 842 00:29:31,559 --> 00:29:33,599 production. 843 00:29:32,679 --> 00:29:36,080 Meaning, 844 00:29:33,599 --> 00:29:38,158 this says that to produce one unit of 845 00:29:36,079 --> 00:29:38,839 the aggregate good, 846 00:29:38,159 --> 00:29:41,440 uh 847 00:29:38,839 --> 00:29:43,359 you need well, 848 00:29:41,440 --> 00:29:44,919 this says that if you have if you add an 849 00:29:43,359 --> 00:29:46,559 extra worker 850 00:29:44,919 --> 00:29:48,200 uh uh, 851 00:29:46,559 --> 00:29:49,399 to the big production function of the 852 00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:51,440 economy, 853 00:29:49,400 --> 00:29:52,800 then you're going to get a more units of 854 00:29:51,440 --> 00:29:53,600 output. 855 00:29:52,799 --> 00:29:55,319 Okay? 856 00:29:53,599 --> 00:29:57,879 That's what this says. 857 00:29:55,319 --> 00:29:59,439 So, Y is output, the output we've been 858 00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:01,560 talking about, measured in the way we 859 00:29:59,440 --> 00:30:04,080 have been talking about and so on. 860 00:30:01,559 --> 00:30:05,759 N is employment, and A is labor 861 00:30:04,079 --> 00:30:06,759 productivity. That is the output per 862 00:30:05,759 --> 00:30:07,640 worker. 863 00:30:06,759 --> 00:30:08,879 Okay? 864 00:30:07,640 --> 00:30:10,120 I want to make things very simple. We're 865 00:30:08,880 --> 00:30:11,160 going to talk a lot about in the next 866 00:30:10,119 --> 00:30:13,519 part of the course, in the part of 867 00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:15,640 growth, about this A, what moves this A 868 00:30:13,519 --> 00:30:17,240 over time, what it does, and so on. 869 00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:19,280 But, but, 870 00:30:17,240 --> 00:30:22,079 I'm going to simplify things a lot here 871 00:30:19,279 --> 00:30:23,039 for now, and I'm going to set A equal to 872 00:30:22,079 --> 00:30:25,119 1. 873 00:30:23,039 --> 00:30:26,359 So, it doesn't get any simpler than this 874 00:30:25,119 --> 00:30:28,279 as a production function. This 875 00:30:26,359 --> 00:30:30,759 production function says, you want to 876 00:30:28,279 --> 00:30:33,200 produce one more good, you need one more 877 00:30:30,759 --> 00:30:33,200 worker. 878 00:30:33,279 --> 00:30:35,799 Okay? 879 00:30:34,359 --> 00:30:37,199 This is what this says. 880 00:30:35,799 --> 00:30:38,759 If you have 10 workers, you produce 10 881 00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:40,440 units of good. 882 00:30:38,759 --> 00:30:42,359 If you have 11 workers, you produce 11 883 00:30:40,440 --> 00:30:44,519 units of goods. Okay, so to produce one 884 00:30:42,359 --> 00:30:45,519 more unit of good, you need 885 00:30:44,519 --> 00:30:48,319 one 886 00:30:45,519 --> 00:30:48,319 worker more. 887 00:30:49,000 --> 00:30:53,839 Now, why do you think I'm 888 00:30:51,960 --> 00:30:56,039 I'm simplifying it so much and I'm right 889 00:30:53,839 --> 00:31:00,000 I'm even repeating this idea that one 890 00:30:56,039 --> 00:31:00,000 more worker, one more unit of good. 891 00:31:00,039 --> 00:31:04,480 That tells you that how much does it 892 00:31:01,880 --> 00:31:05,800 cost to the firm 893 00:31:04,480 --> 00:31:07,240 to the firm that has this production 894 00:31:05,799 --> 00:31:08,519 function 895 00:31:07,240 --> 00:31:12,079 to produce 896 00:31:08,519 --> 00:31:14,720 one extra unit of workers or 897 00:31:12,079 --> 00:31:15,720 one extra unit of goods? 898 00:31:14,720 --> 00:31:18,240 Well, you have to ask the question, 899 00:31:15,720 --> 00:31:19,160 well, what will the firm have to do? 900 00:31:18,240 --> 00:31:20,920 Well, 901 00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:22,960 the first So, suppose a firm wants to 902 00:31:20,920 --> 00:31:25,759 produce one more units of goods. What is 903 00:31:22,960 --> 00:31:25,759 it that it needs to do? 904 00:31:27,160 --> 00:31:32,200 It needs to hire another worker. How 905 00:31:28,920 --> 00:31:32,200 much will that cost? 906 00:31:36,720 --> 00:31:41,279 The wage. The wage. Exactly, no? So, now 907 00:31:39,400 --> 00:31:43,519 we're beginning to So, so this is the 908 00:31:41,279 --> 00:31:45,559 wage in this case is the cost per unit 909 00:31:43,519 --> 00:31:47,599 of production for this guy. So, 910 00:31:45,559 --> 00:31:49,599 the marginal cost of production for this 911 00:31:47,599 --> 00:31:51,639 firm is the wage. 912 00:31:49,599 --> 00:31:53,678 All the rest, intermediate inputs, is 913 00:31:51,640 --> 00:31:56,320 all summarized. This is value added. 914 00:31:53,679 --> 00:31:58,000 Built on something else. 915 00:31:56,319 --> 00:31:59,399 So, this production function, as simple 916 00:31:58,000 --> 00:32:01,599 as it is, says exactly that. The 917 00:31:59,400 --> 00:32:03,519 marginal cost of production is equal to 918 00:32:01,599 --> 00:32:05,000 the wage. 919 00:32:03,519 --> 00:32:06,799 So, assume that the wage that I'm going 920 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:08,920 to So, now I'm going to come up with a 921 00:32:06,799 --> 00:32:11,440 pricing model, a price setting rule. So, 922 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:13,240 firms that understand how much more it 923 00:32:11,440 --> 00:32:15,160 costs to produce an 924 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:17,400 an extra unit of good, now have to 925 00:32:15,160 --> 00:32:20,720 decide the price they want to charge for 926 00:32:17,400 --> 00:32:20,720 that extra unit of the good. 927 00:32:20,799 --> 00:32:24,879 There's a lot that that comes into in 928 00:32:23,039 --> 00:32:27,480 that decision, but but we're going to 929 00:32:24,880 --> 00:32:28,760 summarize it with a markup. Very simple. 930 00:32:27,480 --> 00:32:30,440 We're going to say, "Look, 931 00:32:28,759 --> 00:32:33,599 the the firm will do the following. 932 00:32:30,440 --> 00:32:35,759 We'll say, "It cost me one worker to 933 00:32:33,599 --> 00:32:39,119 produce one one unit of 934 00:32:35,759 --> 00:32:41,759 extra of good. A worker cost me W, so my 935 00:32:39,119 --> 00:32:43,879 the price I want to charge is 1 + M, M 936 00:32:41,759 --> 00:32:46,559 is a positive number, times W." 937 00:32:43,880 --> 00:32:48,840 Okay? So, M is a number like 0.2. 938 00:32:46,559 --> 00:32:51,399 So, you pay 100 in in in the in the 939 00:32:48,839 --> 00:32:53,799 wage, then you're going to charge the 940 00:32:51,400 --> 00:32:56,080 And suppose the wage is 100, 941 00:32:53,799 --> 00:32:59,159 uh, if the markup is 20%, you're going 942 00:32:56,079 --> 00:33:01,599 to set a price of 120. 943 00:32:59,160 --> 00:33:05,040 Okay? That's the price setting rule 944 00:33:01,599 --> 00:33:07,759 that we're going to adopt, and again, 945 00:33:05,039 --> 00:33:10,159 it's not that crazy. 946 00:33:07,759 --> 00:33:12,559 Simple, but not that crazy. 947 00:33:10,160 --> 00:33:14,200 So, that's we call this the price 948 00:33:12,559 --> 00:33:16,240 setting equation. 949 00:33:14,200 --> 00:33:18,279 The firm takes the wage, because that's 950 00:33:16,240 --> 00:33:20,000 the marginal cost of production, 951 00:33:18,279 --> 00:33:22,160 and and then, 952 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:24,200 uh, adds a markup, and that's the final 953 00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:25,840 price. 954 00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:28,799 Now, we can 955 00:33:25,839 --> 00:33:30,799 rewrite this price setting equation 956 00:33:28,799 --> 00:33:32,399 as a as a wage equation in the following 957 00:33:30,799 --> 00:33:34,799 sense. It's still a price setting 958 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:37,759 equation, but this All that I've done 959 00:33:34,799 --> 00:33:41,559 here, no, is I divided by P and by one 960 00:33:37,759 --> 00:33:43,720 by P and 1 + M, and I get that the wage 961 00:33:41,559 --> 00:33:45,000 the the real wage the firm is willing to 962 00:33:43,720 --> 00:33:47,440 pay 963 00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:48,960 is equal to 1 over 1 + the markup. 964 00:33:47,440 --> 00:33:50,759 That's another way of saying it. It's 965 00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:53,240 the same, huh? I took this price setting 966 00:33:50,759 --> 00:33:55,279 equation, and I just rewrote it. 967 00:33:53,240 --> 00:33:56,759 I rewrote it this way because then, you 968 00:33:55,279 --> 00:33:59,160 know, I had when I look at the wage 969 00:33:56,759 --> 00:34:01,720 setting equation, I also wrote it that 970 00:33:59,160 --> 00:34:03,519 that way, W over something. I want to 971 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:06,200 write the price setting equation in the 972 00:34:03,519 --> 00:34:08,039 same sort of units as as my wage setting 973 00:34:06,200 --> 00:34:10,800 equation, so then I can use that one 974 00:34:08,039 --> 00:34:12,878 diagram, put them together easily, 975 00:34:10,800 --> 00:34:15,480 and and find an 976 00:34:12,878 --> 00:34:16,440 an equilibrium of something. 977 00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:18,679 Okay? 978 00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:21,800 So, what you see here is, for example, 979 00:34:18,679 --> 00:34:23,440 is that the higher is the markup, 980 00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:25,800 the lower is the real wage the firm is 981 00:34:23,440 --> 00:34:26,878 willing to offer. 982 00:34:25,800 --> 00:34:28,240 You see that? 983 00:34:26,878 --> 00:34:29,759 They have And this is an equilibrium at 984 00:34:28,239 --> 00:34:31,839 the level of the economy. It's not you 985 00:34:29,760 --> 00:34:33,040 individually, but on average, that's 986 00:34:31,840 --> 00:34:35,720 what ends up happening. If firms on 987 00:34:33,039 --> 00:34:37,358 average end up charging a higher markup, 988 00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:39,759 it has to be the case 989 00:34:37,358 --> 00:34:42,960 that in equilibrium, the real wage 990 00:34:39,760 --> 00:34:44,720 offered by the firms is lower. 991 00:34:42,960 --> 00:34:45,960 That's what this says. 992 00:34:44,719 --> 00:34:47,678 Okay? 993 00:34:45,960 --> 00:34:49,398 So, if we're in a situation where the 994 00:34:47,679 --> 00:34:51,639 markup was zero, 995 00:34:49,398 --> 00:34:53,719 and now all of the sudden, because of 996 00:34:51,639 --> 00:34:56,039 imperfect competition or perhaps the 997 00:34:53,719 --> 00:34:57,679 some price of a key input went up and 998 00:34:56,039 --> 00:34:58,639 it's not really measuring value added or 999 00:34:57,679 --> 00:34:59,480 whatever, 1000 00:34:58,639 --> 00:35:00,358 uh, 1001 00:34:59,480 --> 00:35:03,719 uh, 1002 00:35:00,358 --> 00:35:05,440 if the markup goes to to to one, 1003 00:35:03,719 --> 00:35:06,679 then the real wage in equilibrium will 1004 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:09,079 fall 1005 00:35:06,679 --> 00:35:10,960 to half what it used to be. 1006 00:35:09,079 --> 00:35:13,159 That's what this question That's what 1007 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:14,400 the firms will offer. 1008 00:35:13,159 --> 00:35:15,599 Whether that's an equilibrium or not, we 1009 00:35:14,400 --> 00:35:17,039 shall see. 1010 00:35:15,599 --> 00:35:18,679 Or how do we get to that to be an 1011 00:35:17,039 --> 00:35:20,000 equilibrium, we shall see. 1012 00:35:18,679 --> 00:35:21,440 But that's what the firms will offer. 1013 00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:22,239 That's what the price setting equation 1014 00:35:21,440 --> 00:35:23,280 says. 1015 00:35:22,239 --> 00:35:25,159 In fact, 1016 00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:27,560 you already know from this equation that 1017 00:35:25,159 --> 00:35:29,199 that's what the real wage will be, 1018 00:35:27,559 --> 00:35:31,599 because there's no variable here that 1019 00:35:29,199 --> 00:35:32,879 can adjust to that. 1020 00:35:31,599 --> 00:35:34,799 What happens is something else will have 1021 00:35:32,880 --> 00:35:37,440 to give in the economy, so this ends up 1022 00:35:34,800 --> 00:35:39,400 being the equilibrium wage. Okay? But 1023 00:35:37,440 --> 00:35:40,880 you'll understand that a little later. 1024 00:35:39,400 --> 00:35:43,200 Or you'll understand it better a little 1025 00:35:40,880 --> 00:35:43,200 later. 1026 00:35:43,519 --> 00:35:49,199 Okay. So, now we're almost ready to come 1027 00:35:47,039 --> 00:35:52,440 up with to discuss a very important 1028 00:35:49,199 --> 00:35:54,079 concept in macroeconomics. 1029 00:35:52,440 --> 00:35:56,920 And that's the concept of the natural 1030 00:35:54,079 --> 00:35:59,079 rate of unemployment. 1031 00:35:56,920 --> 00:36:01,200 Now, the first warning is that there's 1032 00:35:59,079 --> 00:36:03,719 nothing natural about the natural rate 1033 00:36:01,199 --> 00:36:05,439 of unemployment. It's not sort of, you 1034 00:36:03,719 --> 00:36:06,559 know, something that God gave us or 1035 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:07,960 anything like that. 1036 00:36:06,559 --> 00:36:10,480 Okay? 1037 00:36:07,960 --> 00:36:12,960 I'll say, for us, 1038 00:36:10,480 --> 00:36:15,000 and and what typically means the natural 1039 00:36:12,960 --> 00:36:18,000 rate of unemployment, 1040 00:36:15,000 --> 00:36:20,039 simply means what I wrote there, 1041 00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:22,079 which is that employment that takes 1042 00:36:20,039 --> 00:36:24,279 place when the 1043 00:36:22,079 --> 00:36:26,239 expected price is equal to actual 1044 00:36:24,280 --> 00:36:27,160 prices. 1045 00:36:26,239 --> 00:36:29,639 Okay? 1046 00:36:27,159 --> 00:36:31,879 That's what we'll define for this 1047 00:36:29,639 --> 00:36:33,400 class, for this course, we'll define the 1048 00:36:31,880 --> 00:36:35,440 natural rate of unemployment. The 1049 00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:37,880 natural rate of unemployment is when the 1050 00:36:35,440 --> 00:36:39,639 expected price is equal to P. 1051 00:36:37,880 --> 00:36:40,599 That's what we mean. If I we ask you any 1052 00:36:39,639 --> 00:36:41,759 question about the natural rate of 1053 00:36:40,599 --> 00:36:43,719 unemployment, 1054 00:36:41,760 --> 00:36:44,920 we don't mean that that's what is good, 1055 00:36:43,719 --> 00:36:47,199 that that's what is bad, that that's 1056 00:36:44,920 --> 00:36:49,960 what God decided or someone else decided 1057 00:36:47,199 --> 00:36:51,559 or whatever. This is all that it means 1058 00:36:49,960 --> 00:36:53,960 is that in any equation where you have 1059 00:36:51,559 --> 00:36:55,960 P, you can stick in P, and then solve 1060 00:36:53,960 --> 00:36:57,679 for equilibrium, and that the employment 1061 00:36:55,960 --> 00:37:00,559 rate that comes from that is what we 1062 00:36:57,679 --> 00:37:03,599 call the natural rate of unemployment. 1063 00:37:00,559 --> 00:37:06,279 Because of this, you can also think of 1064 00:37:03,599 --> 00:37:07,719 that unemployment rate as a sort of 1065 00:37:06,280 --> 00:37:09,480 as a good 1066 00:37:07,719 --> 00:37:11,839 proxy for what is likely to be the 1067 00:37:09,480 --> 00:37:14,880 average rate of unemployment of an 1068 00:37:11,840 --> 00:37:16,680 economy over a longer period of time. 1069 00:37:14,880 --> 00:37:17,960 You know, because people are unlikely to 1070 00:37:16,679 --> 00:37:19,358 be fooled all the time in the same 1071 00:37:17,960 --> 00:37:20,760 direction. So, sometimes they're going 1072 00:37:19,358 --> 00:37:22,559 to expect a higher price than it is, 1073 00:37:20,760 --> 00:37:24,680 sometimes it's a lower, and so on. On 1074 00:37:22,559 --> 00:37:26,199 average, unless there's something very 1075 00:37:24,679 --> 00:37:28,239 weird going on, they're going to get it 1076 00:37:26,199 --> 00:37:29,559 right. But because you know what more or 1077 00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:31,199 less what the level of inflation of the 1078 00:37:29,559 --> 00:37:32,599 economy is, sometimes you'll miss up, 1079 00:37:31,199 --> 00:37:34,519 sometimes you'll miss down, but on 1080 00:37:32,599 --> 00:37:35,719 average, you're going to be right if you 1081 00:37:34,519 --> 00:37:36,960 if you take an average over a long 1082 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:38,039 period of time. 1083 00:37:36,960 --> 00:37:39,840 So, for that reason, you can also 1084 00:37:38,039 --> 00:37:42,000 interpret this natural rate of 1085 00:37:39,840 --> 00:37:43,640 unemployment as an employment rate of 1086 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:45,599 the medium run, if you will. So, when 1087 00:37:43,639 --> 00:37:46,839 you have collected enough data, 1088 00:37:45,599 --> 00:37:48,519 positive errors are balanced with 1089 00:37:46,840 --> 00:37:50,039 negative errors, and so on. 1090 00:37:48,519 --> 00:37:51,119 Okay? 1091 00:37:50,039 --> 00:37:53,400 But that's all that we mean by the 1092 00:37:51,119 --> 00:37:54,358 natural rate of unemployment. 1093 00:37:53,400 --> 00:37:57,000 Okay? 1094 00:37:54,358 --> 00:37:59,400 Now, notice that with this assumption 1095 00:37:57,000 --> 00:38:02,039 that PE is equal to P, I can go back to 1096 00:37:59,400 --> 00:38:05,000 my wage setting equation, which was W 1097 00:38:02,039 --> 00:38:06,960 over PE equal to F dot. I think it I 1098 00:38:05,000 --> 00:38:08,599 don't remember where I divided by P, but 1099 00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:11,079 I had PE there. 1100 00:38:08,599 --> 00:38:13,759 I'm going to divide by P both sides, 1101 00:38:11,079 --> 00:38:15,519 and then I'm going to set PE equal to P, 1102 00:38:13,760 --> 00:38:18,320 and now I have that my wage setting 1103 00:38:15,519 --> 00:38:20,000 equation can be written this way, and 1104 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,400 notice that that employment rate I put 1105 00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:22,599 here is the N. 1106 00:38:21,400 --> 00:38:24,559 And it's the natural rate of 1107 00:38:22,599 --> 00:38:26,799 unemployment. 1108 00:38:24,559 --> 00:38:28,599 Because once I get in a model in which 1109 00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:29,960 you assume that P is equal to P, that 1110 00:38:28,599 --> 00:38:32,799 employment rate that comes out of that 1111 00:38:29,960 --> 00:38:34,358 is a natural rate of unemployment. 1112 00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:36,000 Okay? That's That's all that it just 1113 00:38:34,358 --> 00:38:38,199 means. It says, "Okay, 1114 00:38:36,000 --> 00:38:39,800 you allow me to to replace PE by P, 1115 00:38:38,199 --> 00:38:41,279 well, then I can call my unemployment 1116 00:38:39,800 --> 00:38:43,880 rate here the natural rate of 1117 00:38:41,280 --> 00:38:43,880 unemployment." 1118 00:38:46,920 --> 00:38:50,240 And it has lots of names. It's the 1119 00:38:48,599 --> 00:38:53,400 natural rate, the structural rate of 1120 00:38:50,239 --> 00:38:53,399 unemployment, and so on. 1121 00:38:54,679 --> 00:38:58,559 Now, what this tells you, 1122 00:38:56,960 --> 00:39:00,800 I mean, you can see the slope of this 1123 00:38:58,559 --> 00:39:02,320 function. 1124 00:39:00,800 --> 00:39:04,920 If the natural rate of unemployment is 1125 00:39:02,320 --> 00:39:07,080 higher in this economy, 1126 00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:09,480 what is the real wage that comes from 1127 00:39:07,079 --> 00:39:11,679 the wage setting equation? 1128 00:39:09,480 --> 00:39:13,639 Lower. 1129 00:39:11,679 --> 00:39:15,399 curve in the space of wages to real 1130 00:39:13,639 --> 00:39:17,159 wages to unemployment. 1131 00:39:15,400 --> 00:39:18,840 to the natural rate of unemployment. 1132 00:39:17,159 --> 00:39:20,399 It's a downward sloping curve for the 1133 00:39:18,840 --> 00:39:22,880 reasons we discussed before, bargaining 1134 00:39:20,400 --> 00:39:25,519 power, and so on. Okay? 1135 00:39:22,880 --> 00:39:28,160 So, I can put together, remember the the 1136 00:39:25,519 --> 00:39:30,199 price setting equation led me to also an 1137 00:39:28,159 --> 00:39:32,000 equation of the real wage, which was not 1138 00:39:30,199 --> 00:39:33,239 a function of anything. It was only a 1139 00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:34,800 function of parameters. So, that's a 1140 00:39:33,239 --> 00:39:36,839 horizontal 1141 00:39:34,800 --> 00:39:38,039 curve in the space of real wages and 1142 00:39:36,840 --> 00:39:40,240 unemployment, natural rate of 1143 00:39:38,039 --> 00:39:41,679 unemployment. Here, we have a downward 1144 00:39:40,239 --> 00:39:44,359 sloping curve, 1145 00:39:41,679 --> 00:39:46,480 and the intersection of these two curves 1146 00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:47,400 is the natural rate of unemployment. 1147 00:39:46,480 --> 00:39:49,719 Okay? 1148 00:39:47,400 --> 00:39:52,400 So, this was the price setting relation. 1149 00:39:49,719 --> 00:39:56,159 Remember, it's 1 over 1 plus M. 1150 00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:56,960 This is the wage setting equation. 1151 00:39:56,159 --> 00:39:58,920 Uh 1152 00:39:56,960 --> 00:40:00,720 with the assumption that PE is equal to 1153 00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:03,320 P. 1154 00:40:00,719 --> 00:40:04,719 And that's the natural rate of 1155 00:40:03,320 --> 00:40:05,800 unemployment. 1156 00:40:04,719 --> 00:40:07,159 And here you can understand what I said 1157 00:40:05,800 --> 00:40:09,039 before is that 1158 00:40:07,159 --> 00:40:11,519 you see, in this economy 1159 00:40:09,039 --> 00:40:13,480 the real wage, because this price 1160 00:40:11,519 --> 00:40:15,800 setting equation is flat in the simple 1161 00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:17,440 economy, the real wage is pinned down by 1162 00:40:15,800 --> 00:40:19,760 the firm. 1163 00:40:17,440 --> 00:40:23,559 By the firms collectively. 1164 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:25,080 And not collectively in an oligopolistic 1165 00:40:23,559 --> 00:40:26,360 way. It's, you know, it's what happens 1166 00:40:25,079 --> 00:40:27,039 in equilibrium. 1167 00:40:26,360 --> 00:40:29,400 Uh 1168 00:40:27,039 --> 00:40:30,480 it's set by that, but the equilibrium 1169 00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:32,440 unemployment natural rate of 1170 00:40:30,480 --> 00:40:34,679 unemployment is intersection of that 1171 00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:39,000 real wage set by the firms 1172 00:40:34,679 --> 00:40:39,000 and the wage setting relationship. 1173 00:40:40,400 --> 00:40:43,320 So, what happens 1174 00:40:43,360 --> 00:40:48,720 in a to a point say to the right? 1175 00:40:46,719 --> 00:40:51,839 What happens in this point here? 1176 00:40:48,719 --> 00:40:51,839 What is the situation we have? 1177 00:40:57,599 --> 00:41:00,920 Well, 1178 00:40:58,519 --> 00:41:03,159 at that high level of unemployment 1179 00:41:00,920 --> 00:41:04,680 workers are willing to work for much 1180 00:41:03,159 --> 00:41:07,000 lower real wages than the firms are 1181 00:41:04,679 --> 00:41:07,000 offering. 1182 00:41:07,159 --> 00:41:10,079 Okay? 1183 00:41:08,559 --> 00:41:11,360 This is what workers at this level of 1184 00:41:10,079 --> 00:41:12,480 unemployment, very high level of 1185 00:41:11,360 --> 00:41:14,640 unemployment 1186 00:41:12,480 --> 00:41:17,519 workers would be fine with this. 1187 00:41:14,639 --> 00:41:18,639 Firms are paying that. 1188 00:41:17,519 --> 00:41:19,960 Okay? 1189 00:41:18,639 --> 00:41:21,279 So, 1190 00:41:19,960 --> 00:41:23,159 unemployment is very likely to be 1191 00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:25,200 falling because workers are not 1192 00:41:23,159 --> 00:41:26,399 demanding a lot and and and firms, you 1193 00:41:25,199 --> 00:41:28,319 know, are going to hire all these 1194 00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:30,559 workers back. 1195 00:41:28,320 --> 00:41:32,720 The opposite here. 1196 00:41:30,559 --> 00:41:34,360 If here workers are demanding a wage 1197 00:41:32,719 --> 00:41:36,359 that is much higher than firms are 1198 00:41:34,360 --> 00:41:37,680 willing to pay. 1199 00:41:36,360 --> 00:41:39,000 Well, that's likely to lead to more 1200 00:41:37,679 --> 00:41:41,039 unemployment because firms are going to 1201 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:43,280 be very reluctant to hire 1202 00:41:41,039 --> 00:41:45,000 uh these very expensive workers. 1203 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:47,920 Okay? So, that's going to build 1204 00:41:45,000 --> 00:41:49,840 unemployment in this direction. 1205 00:41:47,920 --> 00:41:51,159 Good. So, that's 1206 00:41:49,840 --> 00:41:52,720 that's the natural rate of unemployment. 1207 00:41:51,159 --> 00:41:54,079 Again, nothing natural about it. It's 1208 00:41:52,719 --> 00:41:56,000 the equilibrium when you assume the 1209 00:41:54,079 --> 00:41:58,239 expected price is equal to 1210 00:41:56,000 --> 00:42:00,440 uh price. So, there are some important 1211 00:41:58,239 --> 00:42:02,439 parameters in this diagram here. 1212 00:42:00,440 --> 00:42:04,000 One is this M. 1213 00:42:02,440 --> 00:42:06,639 The markup. That's a parameter, very 1214 00:42:04,000 --> 00:42:09,000 important markup here. To So, see, 1215 00:42:06,639 --> 00:42:11,799 if the markup changes the natural rate 1216 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:13,320 of unemployment will change. 1217 00:42:11,800 --> 00:42:14,640 There's another set of parameters here 1218 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:17,200 which is 1219 00:42:14,639 --> 00:42:18,319 Z. We took as given the institution that 1220 00:42:17,199 --> 00:42:19,799 protect 1221 00:42:18,320 --> 00:42:22,880 the bargaining power of workers 1222 00:42:19,800 --> 00:42:25,240 institutions, supporting institutions. 1223 00:42:22,880 --> 00:42:26,599 The Z. That's a parameter here. If that 1224 00:42:25,239 --> 00:42:28,799 changes, the natural rate of 1225 00:42:26,599 --> 00:42:31,159 unemployment will change. 1226 00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:32,240 Which is again something that confirms 1227 00:42:31,159 --> 00:42:34,759 there's nothing natural about the 1228 00:42:32,239 --> 00:42:36,719 natural rate of unemployment. 1229 00:42:34,760 --> 00:42:39,160 So, let me just do it in equations very 1230 00:42:36,719 --> 00:42:39,759 quickly and then and then 1231 00:42:39,159 --> 00:42:41,279 uh 1232 00:42:39,760 --> 00:42:43,520 I'll do a 1233 00:42:41,280 --> 00:42:45,840 a couple of important shifts. 1234 00:42:43,519 --> 00:42:47,920 Uh so, in terms of equation, all that I 1235 00:42:45,840 --> 00:42:49,680 did is say, "Look, the wage wage setting 1236 00:42:47,920 --> 00:42:51,039 equation the price setting equation 1237 00:42:49,679 --> 00:42:53,480 gives us that. 1238 00:42:51,039 --> 00:42:55,320 The wage setting equation gives us that. 1239 00:42:53,480 --> 00:42:56,800 Therefore, that equal to that. That's 1240 00:42:55,320 --> 00:42:58,800 the point we found. That's the natural 1241 00:42:56,800 --> 00:43:00,680 rate of unemployment." Okay? 1242 00:42:58,800 --> 00:43:02,400 So, from here 1243 00:43:00,679 --> 00:43:03,759 that's when the two are equal. This is 1244 00:43:02,400 --> 00:43:05,800 what's the flat curve. This is what's 1245 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:07,400 the downward sloping curve. Well, these 1246 00:43:05,800 --> 00:43:08,560 two are equal 1247 00:43:07,400 --> 00:43:11,079 uh 1248 00:43:08,559 --> 00:43:12,079 when these two things are equal. Okay? 1249 00:43:11,079 --> 00:43:13,279 And that's where you get there. So, from 1250 00:43:12,079 --> 00:43:15,759 there you solve the natural rate of 1251 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:17,120 unemployment. 1252 00:43:15,760 --> 00:43:21,320 What do you think happens to the natural 1253 00:43:17,119 --> 00:43:21,319 rate of unemployment if Z goes up? 1254 00:43:23,599 --> 00:43:28,239 Let's just be very mechanical at this 1255 00:43:25,239 --> 00:43:30,000 point. Just math. 1256 00:43:28,239 --> 00:43:33,559 If Z goes up 1257 00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:33,559 what what happens to F? 1258 00:43:36,719 --> 00:43:42,079 Goes up, no? If Z was positive. 1259 00:43:40,119 --> 00:43:43,759 Well, the right hand side hasn't gone 1260 00:43:42,079 --> 00:43:46,360 up. 1261 00:43:43,760 --> 00:43:48,280 So, this went up. 1262 00:43:46,360 --> 00:43:50,000 Something has to give, so F comes back 1263 00:43:48,280 --> 00:43:51,680 down. 1264 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:53,639 And the only thing that can give, the 1265 00:43:51,679 --> 00:43:54,519 only thing is endogenous in that picture 1266 00:43:53,639 --> 00:43:56,039 there is the natural rate of 1267 00:43:54,519 --> 00:43:58,199 unemployment. 1268 00:43:56,039 --> 00:44:00,119 So, if Z goes up, F goes up. Well, I 1269 00:43:58,199 --> 00:44:03,679 need to bring F back down because the 1270 00:44:00,119 --> 00:44:03,679 right hand side hasn't given an inch. 1271 00:44:03,920 --> 00:44:10,000 So, what do I have to do to natural rate 1272 00:44:06,000 --> 00:44:10,000 of unemployment for F to come back down? 1273 00:44:10,079 --> 00:44:13,559 Price, no? Because that's what will 1274 00:44:11,760 --> 00:44:15,640 weaken bargaining power. 1275 00:44:13,559 --> 00:44:17,239 Workers bargaining power got stronger 1276 00:44:15,639 --> 00:44:18,839 because increasing Z, well, I have to 1277 00:44:17,239 --> 00:44:21,039 weaken it some. I don't have to 1278 00:44:18,840 --> 00:44:22,960 Equilibrium will weaken it somehow 1279 00:44:21,039 --> 00:44:24,800 so that we end up in the same situation 1280 00:44:22,960 --> 00:44:26,960 with the same real wage that we had 1281 00:44:24,800 --> 00:44:28,120 before, which was equal to 1 over 1 plus 1282 00:44:26,960 --> 00:44:31,440 M. 1283 00:44:28,119 --> 00:44:34,319 What happens if M goes up? 1284 00:44:31,440 --> 00:44:37,079 Well, if M goes up markups go up. That 1285 00:44:34,320 --> 00:44:37,680 means firms real wage 1286 00:44:37,079 --> 00:44:41,599 uh 1287 00:44:37,679 --> 00:44:44,159 the real wage firms offer drops. 1288 00:44:41,599 --> 00:44:46,079 So, I need If this right hand side 1289 00:44:44,159 --> 00:44:48,358 drops, then I need the left hand side to 1290 00:44:46,079 --> 00:44:49,799 drop drop as well. 1291 00:44:48,358 --> 00:44:50,880 And the only thing that is endogenous 1292 00:44:49,800 --> 00:44:52,880 here is the natural rate of 1293 00:44:50,880 --> 00:44:55,519 unemployment. 1294 00:44:52,880 --> 00:44:59,200 So, I know that I need to but to drop F, 1295 00:44:55,519 --> 00:44:59,199 what do I need to do to UN? 1296 00:44:59,320 --> 00:45:04,280 So, I need to bring F down. And the only 1297 00:45:02,358 --> 00:45:06,159 tool you have, it's not a tool, but in 1298 00:45:04,280 --> 00:45:08,880 equilibrium everything that will 1299 00:45:06,159 --> 00:45:10,960 can change here is UN. 1300 00:45:08,880 --> 00:45:12,680 It will 1301 00:45:10,960 --> 00:45:14,119 It will increase UN. 1302 00:45:12,679 --> 00:45:15,559 Because that will reduce bargaining 1303 00:45:14,119 --> 00:45:17,440 power of workers and that will reduce 1304 00:45:15,559 --> 00:45:18,960 their their real wage demand and 1305 00:45:17,440 --> 00:45:19,800 therefore you restore equilibrium that 1306 00:45:18,960 --> 00:45:21,320 way. 1307 00:45:19,800 --> 00:45:23,800 So, this environment is a very nasty 1308 00:45:21,320 --> 00:45:24,920 environment for workers in a sense, no? 1309 00:45:23,800 --> 00:45:27,840 Because 1310 00:45:24,920 --> 00:45:30,320 it's always the the scapegoat is is the 1311 00:45:27,840 --> 00:45:32,280 natural rate of unemployment. 1312 00:45:30,320 --> 00:45:34,519 So, here you have what I just said in in 1313 00:45:32,280 --> 00:45:36,359 pictures. So, that's the example of Z 1314 00:45:34,519 --> 00:45:38,559 going up. 1315 00:45:36,358 --> 00:45:39,960 Bargaining power of workers going up. 1316 00:45:38,559 --> 00:45:42,079 So, suppose you start at an at an 1317 00:45:39,960 --> 00:45:45,199 equilibrium like this. 1318 00:45:42,079 --> 00:45:47,599 And now and now Z goes up. 1319 00:45:45,199 --> 00:45:50,319 Well, that means that workers for any 1320 00:45:47,599 --> 00:45:52,599 given level of unemployment natural rate 1321 00:45:50,320 --> 00:45:55,280 of unemployment want a higher wage. 1322 00:45:52,599 --> 00:45:57,480 Because they have more bargaining power. 1323 00:45:55,280 --> 00:46:00,240 Well, that higher wage is inconsistent 1324 00:45:57,480 --> 00:46:01,639 with the wage that firms want to pay. 1325 00:46:00,239 --> 00:46:02,919 What restores equilibrium is 1326 00:46:01,639 --> 00:46:05,279 unemployment the natural rate of 1327 00:46:02,920 --> 00:46:08,000 unemployment goes up 1328 00:46:05,280 --> 00:46:10,400 enough so that the wage demand sort of 1329 00:46:08,000 --> 00:46:12,320 comes down to the same original level 1330 00:46:10,400 --> 00:46:13,840 because this this price setting equation 1331 00:46:12,320 --> 00:46:14,640 is completely flat. 1332 00:46:13,840 --> 00:46:16,640 Okay? 1333 00:46:14,639 --> 00:46:19,039 So, there you have a a situation where 1334 00:46:16,639 --> 00:46:21,199 bargaining power of workers went up. 1335 00:46:19,039 --> 00:46:23,400 And all that ended up happening is is 1336 00:46:21,199 --> 00:46:25,439 that in the medium run at least 1337 00:46:23,400 --> 00:46:27,079 that the natural rate of unemployment 1338 00:46:25,440 --> 00:46:29,159 went up. 1339 00:46:27,079 --> 00:46:30,480 That's very much the story of Europe, by 1340 00:46:29,159 --> 00:46:32,480 the way. 1341 00:46:30,480 --> 00:46:34,039 In the '80s, France in particular. In 1342 00:46:32,480 --> 00:46:35,240 France they sort of made your labor 1343 00:46:34,039 --> 00:46:38,159 reforms 1344 00:46:35,239 --> 00:46:39,439 Z boosting, if you will, in the 1980s. 1345 00:46:38,159 --> 00:46:41,399 Initially it was a great deal for 1346 00:46:39,440 --> 00:46:42,720 workers. Real wages went up and so on. 1347 00:46:41,400 --> 00:46:44,320 It was wonderful. 1348 00:46:42,719 --> 00:46:46,439 But eventually with the passage of time 1349 00:46:44,320 --> 00:46:48,039 they end up just with a much higher real 1350 00:46:46,440 --> 00:46:49,440 not a much higher real wage, but a much 1351 00:46:48,039 --> 00:46:52,639 higher real 1352 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:55,280 unemployment rate. Okay? They went from 1353 00:46:52,639 --> 00:46:57,719 uh single digit lows in the digits to, 1354 00:46:55,280 --> 00:46:59,480 you know, 15% unemployment rates and 1355 00:46:57,719 --> 00:47:00,639 things like that. And since then they 1356 00:46:59,480 --> 00:47:02,519 have been sort of 1357 00:47:00,639 --> 00:47:03,920 reforming the labor market to fix some 1358 00:47:02,519 --> 00:47:06,079 of that. But 1359 00:47:03,920 --> 00:47:08,358 but that's that's that was very much 1360 00:47:06,079 --> 00:47:10,719 what happened in continental Europe 1361 00:47:08,358 --> 00:47:12,719 in the '80s. 1362 00:47:10,719 --> 00:47:15,358 This is the case of a markup increase. 1363 00:47:12,719 --> 00:47:18,399 It's the other one I described, no? So, 1364 00:47:15,358 --> 00:47:20,079 uh if if markups go up 1365 00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:22,519 then initially that means firms in 1366 00:47:20,079 --> 00:47:24,639 equilibrium are not willing to pay real 1367 00:47:22,519 --> 00:47:27,280 wages uh 1368 00:47:24,639 --> 00:47:28,679 they they want to pay a lower real wage. 1369 00:47:27,280 --> 00:47:30,519 Well, at this level of unemployment 1370 00:47:28,679 --> 00:47:31,480 workers are not going to take it. 1371 00:47:30,519 --> 00:47:32,880 The only thing that will restore 1372 00:47:31,480 --> 00:47:35,400 equilibrium is that the natural rate of 1373 00:47:32,880 --> 00:47:37,000 unemployment goes up. That weakens 1374 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:38,720 the hand of workers. 1375 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:40,519 And you end up 1376 00:47:38,719 --> 00:47:42,000 uh with this. And again, there's nothing 1377 00:47:40,519 --> 00:47:44,039 natural about this. I'm not saying this 1378 00:47:42,000 --> 00:47:46,440 is good, bad. I have no idea why the 1379 00:47:44,039 --> 00:47:48,199 markups went up. If it is just imperfect 1380 00:47:46,440 --> 00:47:49,400 competition going up, that's clearly not 1381 00:47:48,199 --> 00:47:51,039 a good thing. 1382 00:47:49,400 --> 00:47:52,800 Uh but it may have been something else. 1383 00:47:51,039 --> 00:47:55,159 The price of oil went up a lot. I don't 1384 00:47:52,800 --> 00:47:57,039 know. Uh was a war somewhere and then 1385 00:47:55,159 --> 00:47:58,559 productivity came down. So, something of 1386 00:47:57,039 --> 00:48:00,440 that kind. 1387 00:47:58,559 --> 00:48:01,799 So, I don't know what did it. But but 1388 00:48:00,440 --> 00:48:03,599 the only thing I'm describing here is 1389 00:48:01,800 --> 00:48:05,840 the mechanics. 1390 00:48:03,599 --> 00:48:05,839 Okay? 1391 00:48:06,320 --> 00:48:09,400 Good. 1392 00:48:08,039 --> 00:48:10,039 So, 1393 00:48:09,400 --> 00:48:11,760 uh 1394 00:48:10,039 --> 00:48:14,440 the quiz is up to here. 1395 00:48:11,760 --> 00:48:15,720 Right? So, the the quiz ends here. 1396 00:48:14,440 --> 00:48:17,320 Okay? 1397 00:48:15,719 --> 00:48:19,319 Uh in the next lecture we're going to 1398 00:48:17,320 --> 00:48:21,320 learn I'm going to start the Phillips 1399 00:48:19,320 --> 00:48:22,640 curve, which is now 1400 00:48:21,320 --> 00:48:24,440 using this model, but looking at 1401 00:48:22,639 --> 00:48:26,440 deviations, situations where the price 1402 00:48:24,440 --> 00:48:28,880 is not equal to expected price or 1403 00:48:26,440 --> 00:48:31,000 expected price is not equal to to 1404 00:48:28,880 --> 00:48:33,079 to the actual price. And and that's 1405 00:48:31,000 --> 00:48:33,960 going to lead to interesting situations. 1406 00:48:33,079 --> 00:48:35,039 Uh 1407 00:48:33,960 --> 00:48:36,599 and there we're going to be talking 1408 00:48:35,039 --> 00:48:38,358 about inflation. Here this is not a 1409 00:48:36,599 --> 00:48:39,679 model to talk about inflation. I'm 1410 00:48:38,358 --> 00:48:42,039 talking about what happens in the medium 1411 00:48:39,679 --> 00:48:43,759 run. I haven't told you whether 1412 00:48:42,039 --> 00:48:45,880 adjustment happens through the nominal 1413 00:48:43,760 --> 00:48:47,920 wage, through the prices, or what. I 1414 00:48:45,880 --> 00:48:50,320 mean, there are many ways of 1415 00:48:47,920 --> 00:48:51,920 reaching the same real wage. 1416 00:48:50,320 --> 00:48:54,000 You know, you could have it 1417 00:48:51,920 --> 00:48:55,920 uh you could you could lower real real 1418 00:48:54,000 --> 00:48:59,960 wages by increasing 1419 00:48:55,920 --> 00:49:00,760 wages by 50% and prices by 60, say. 1420 00:48:59,960 --> 00:49:02,358 No? 1421 00:49:00,760 --> 00:49:04,720 Or you could do it by, you know, 1422 00:49:02,358 --> 00:49:06,319 lowering nominal wages by 10 and not 1423 00:49:04,719 --> 00:49:07,439 moving prices. So, there are many ways 1424 00:49:06,320 --> 00:49:08,760 of doing it. The Phillips curve doesn't 1425 00:49:07,440 --> 00:49:10,358 allow us to 1426 00:49:08,760 --> 00:49:12,480 to get into that part. But it's not 1427 00:49:10,358 --> 00:49:14,239 going to be part of your quiz. The quiz 1428 00:49:12,480 --> 00:49:15,840 that's going to be part of of the second 1429 00:49:14,239 --> 00:49:16,959 quiz. So, in the next lecture we're 1430 00:49:15,840 --> 00:49:19,240 going to talk about the Phillips curve 1431 00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:22,800 and then on Wednesday a review and 1432 00:49:19,239 --> 00:49:22,799 and then you have your quiz. Okay?