1 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:22,839 Okay, let's uh let's start. Um 2 00:00:21,399 --> 00:00:26,079 So, what you have there in that picture 3 00:00:22,839 --> 00:00:27,920 is uh is the result of a survey to a 4 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:30,119 bunch of economists 5 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:31,640 on which are asked to assess the 6 00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:34,920 probability that there is a recession 7 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:37,240 within the next 12 months. 8 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:38,719 Recession means essentially a decline in 9 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:41,560 aggregate output. 10 00:00:38,719 --> 00:00:43,600 Um and well, the first thing to notice 11 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:45,880 here is that you know, it's not very 12 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:48,200 good news. There is a very high chances 13 00:00:45,880 --> 00:00:50,760 at at least according to 14 00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:53,160 this expert that that the US enters a 15 00:00:50,759 --> 00:00:55,479 recession within the next 12 months or 16 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:57,000 so. Pretty high probability. 17 00:00:55,479 --> 00:00:59,039 You can see that that number typically 18 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:01,759 is very very low and it goes very high 19 00:00:59,039 --> 00:01:03,679 sort of real next to recessions. 20 00:01:01,759 --> 00:01:05,879 And now we're not in a recession, but 21 00:01:03,679 --> 00:01:08,200 but there is a sort of very high per se 22 00:01:05,879 --> 00:01:10,560 probability that we may 23 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:12,920 go into recession in the near future. 24 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:15,120 So, how is that these people come up 25 00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:17,760 with this forecast? Well, 26 00:01:15,120 --> 00:01:20,560 at some level, either explicitly or 27 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:21,480 implicitly, they must have some model 28 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:23,320 uh 29 00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:24,960 that of the determination of equilibrium 30 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,479 output. I mean, you know, they need to 31 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:28,079 understand 32 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,719 they need to see certain things that 33 00:01:28,079 --> 00:01:32,719 suggest 34 00:01:29,719 --> 00:01:34,079 when you go through a model that output 35 00:01:32,719 --> 00:01:36,000 will decline. 36 00:01:34,079 --> 00:01:38,200 Um so, that's what we're going to start 37 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,040 doing today. And 38 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:40,840 and in fact, that's what we're going to 39 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,480 do 40 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:46,079 throughout this course. It's we're going 41 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:49,359 to try to find ever more complex perhaps 42 00:01:46,079 --> 00:01:51,599 or or richer models of 43 00:01:49,359 --> 00:01:53,319 uh output determination, aggregate 44 00:01:51,599 --> 00:01:55,359 output determination. So, that's 45 00:01:53,319 --> 00:01:56,079 essentially what this course is about. 46 00:01:55,359 --> 00:01:58,239 Uh 47 00:01:56,079 --> 00:01:59,239 and so, and understanding sort of we're 48 00:01:58,239 --> 00:02:01,559 going to try to understand what is it 49 00:01:59,239 --> 00:02:03,479 that drives that equilibrium output and 50 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,200 how is it that we get to one specific 51 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,400 level of output. 52 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:08,520 That's what it means to find the 53 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:10,360 equilibrium level of output. 54 00:02:08,520 --> 00:02:11,920 Um and we're going to do it sort of in 55 00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:13,760 three stages. 56 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:15,559 In the first part of the course, that is 57 00:02:13,759 --> 00:02:17,560 up to quiz one, 58 00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:19,879 uh we're going to focus on on on the 59 00:02:17,560 --> 00:02:22,479 very short run. How output is determined 60 00:02:19,879 --> 00:02:23,560 in the very short run, say within a year 61 00:02:22,479 --> 00:02:24,519 or so. 62 00:02:23,560 --> 00:02:25,159 Uh 63 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:27,280 uh 64 00:02:25,159 --> 00:02:29,359 well, a little more even, but but that 65 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,120 type of frame time frame. 66 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:34,000 Then we're going to focus on the medium 67 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:35,599 run. That's sort of is 68 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,120 at the beginning of 69 00:02:35,599 --> 00:02:38,840 of of the second part of the course. 70 00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:40,480 Uh 71 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:41,920 and by the medium run, simply we're 72 00:02:40,479 --> 00:02:44,000 going to mean by the time in which 73 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:47,159 prices begin to adjust sufficiently. 74 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:49,479 Okay? Before that, is most of the action 75 00:02:47,159 --> 00:02:52,039 happens in in quantities. There is 76 00:02:49,479 --> 00:02:53,599 little movement in goods prices. There's 77 00:02:52,039 --> 00:02:55,840 lots of movement in asset prices, but 78 00:02:53,599 --> 00:02:57,239 little movement in goods prices. 79 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,200 And in the last part of the course, 80 00:02:57,240 --> 00:03:00,800 we're going to look at how output is 81 00:02:59,199 --> 00:03:02,280 determined over the long run, which is 82 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:04,920 quite different from how output is 83 00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:06,599 determined in the short run. 84 00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:08,559 The determination of output in the short 85 00:03:06,599 --> 00:03:11,439 run is what we mostly mean by business 86 00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:12,759 cycle analysis. Okay? And short or 87 00:03:11,439 --> 00:03:14,520 medium run, the way we're going to 88 00:03:12,759 --> 00:03:15,879 define it here, is what we mean by 89 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,520 business cycle. The country's in a 90 00:03:15,879 --> 00:03:19,359 recession, it's in a boom, it's an 91 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,800 expansion. Those are all terminologies 92 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:23,200 of the short run 93 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,560 or short or medium run. 94 00:03:23,199 --> 00:03:26,679 The determination of equilibrium output 95 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:29,240 in the long run is when we think about 96 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:31,480 growth. When we talk about why is it 97 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:32,840 China grows faster than the US today? 98 00:03:31,479 --> 00:03:34,759 Well, that's a that's a question not 99 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:37,400 about the business cycle. It's a 100 00:03:34,759 --> 00:03:40,759 question about the long-run determinants 101 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:42,840 of output growth. Okay? And and they're 102 00:03:40,759 --> 00:03:44,479 even different class of models. 103 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,159 In more advanced models, if you were 104 00:03:44,479 --> 00:03:48,599 doing a PhD, those things are a lot 105 00:03:46,159 --> 00:03:50,079 closer to each other and and and but but 106 00:03:48,599 --> 00:03:52,199 in this course, they're going to be very 107 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:54,160 different type of models. It's easier to 108 00:03:52,199 --> 00:03:56,919 analyze these things with different type 109 00:03:54,159 --> 00:03:59,560 of models than trying to integrate all 110 00:03:56,919 --> 00:04:01,439 in one big machine. Okay? But let's 111 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,640 start with the the simple part. In the 112 00:04:01,439 --> 00:04:04,359 short run, 113 00:04:02,639 --> 00:04:08,000 the key mechanism, something that will 114 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:10,480 will keep showing up uh in all the 115 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:11,280 models and sub models we analyze 116 00:04:10,479 --> 00:04:13,560 uh 117 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:15,280 in the first eight lectures or so or 118 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:17,759 seven lectures of the next seven 119 00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:19,279 lectures or so, is this mechanism. In 120 00:04:17,759 --> 00:04:21,879 the very short run, 121 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:23,159 output, that is equilibrium output, the 122 00:04:21,879 --> 00:04:25,399 thing that these economists are 123 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:27,840 forecasting that will decline in the 124 00:04:25,399 --> 00:04:30,000 next 12 within the next 12 months, 125 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:32,399 is determined primarily 126 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,360 by act what we call demand. 127 00:04:32,399 --> 00:04:35,919 Okay? 128 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:37,520 So, demand will determine output. That's 129 00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:39,160 the change in demand that will change 130 00:04:37,519 --> 00:04:41,319 production. 131 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:43,120 But when production changes, that will 132 00:04:41,319 --> 00:04:44,560 also change income. That you know from 133 00:04:43,120 --> 00:04:47,759 national accounts. Remember we said that 134 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:49,079 we could measure output from the 135 00:04:47,759 --> 00:04:50,639 production side, but we also could 136 00:04:49,079 --> 00:04:52,639 measure the income side. And they're 137 00:04:50,639 --> 00:04:54,159 exactly the same. More production, 138 00:04:52,639 --> 00:04:57,199 somebody has to receive the proceeds of 139 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:59,400 that. Workers and owners, capital 140 00:04:57,199 --> 00:05:02,079 owners, the government, whatever. 141 00:04:59,399 --> 00:05:02,919 But so, changes in in So, the second 142 00:05:02,079 --> 00:05:04,719 step we're going to make is those 143 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:07,040 changes in production that were brought 144 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:08,680 about by the changes in demand will lead 145 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:10,280 to a change in income. 146 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:11,840 But when income changes, that will 147 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:14,079 change demand again. 148 00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:16,560 And so on and so forth. Okay? So, that's 149 00:05:14,079 --> 00:05:18,639 essentially that's quintessential 150 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:19,959 short-run macro. It's to to try to 151 00:05:18,639 --> 00:05:21,399 understand this 152 00:05:19,959 --> 00:05:23,359 aggregate demand, because that's the 153 00:05:21,399 --> 00:05:24,799 main driver, and then how it gets 154 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:27,439 multiplied 155 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:28,360 uh in the short run. Okay? And 156 00:05:27,439 --> 00:05:30,000 in this lecture, we're going to talk 157 00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:31,920 about just about that. 158 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:33,560 You know, primarily about that. Okay? 159 00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:35,640 But that's that's when So, when I mean 160 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:36,600 short-run macro, that's the structure I 161 00:05:35,639 --> 00:05:38,360 have in mind and that's the structure 162 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:39,920 most people have in mind. Something 163 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,439 where aggregate demand will determine 164 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:42,480 that. That's the reason why in the short 165 00:05:41,439 --> 00:05:45,160 run you worry a lot about whether 166 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:46,600 consumer confidence is high or low. 167 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:48,680 That's demand. If consumers are very 168 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:50,760 depressed, they tend to reduce demand. 169 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:52,480 If consumers are very bullish, that will 170 00:05:50,759 --> 00:05:54,519 tend to increase 171 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:56,319 demand. And since in the short run 172 00:05:54,519 --> 00:05:58,039 output is determined by demand, the 173 00:05:56,319 --> 00:06:00,319 business cycle, whether we have got a 174 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:02,040 recession or not, depends on about how 175 00:06:00,319 --> 00:06:03,680 demand feels. So, if somebody's 176 00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:07,400 forecasting a recession within the next 177 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:09,600 12 months, he's forecasting really that 178 00:06:07,399 --> 00:06:12,639 demand will decline within the next 12 179 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:14,200 months. Okay? 180 00:06:12,639 --> 00:06:15,319 Why they're forecasting that, that's 181 00:06:14,199 --> 00:06:16,399 something we're going to learn in the 182 00:06:15,319 --> 00:06:17,959 steps 183 00:06:16,399 --> 00:06:19,039 uh as we go through the course. What 184 00:06:17,959 --> 00:06:20,639 what are the kind of things that they 185 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,920 may be thinking about? What are the 186 00:06:20,639 --> 00:06:25,039 drugs on aggregate demand that are 187 00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:26,800 likely to depress demand? 188 00:06:25,040 --> 00:06:30,240 Uh and so on and so forth. But that 189 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:31,759 we'll we'll get there. Okay? 190 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:34,280 Anyways, first let me tell you about the 191 00:06:31,759 --> 00:06:35,159 components of aggregate demand. 192 00:06:34,279 --> 00:06:37,879 Uh 193 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:39,080 the first and one of the and the largest 194 00:06:37,879 --> 00:06:41,399 component of aggregate demand is 195 00:06:39,079 --> 00:06:43,519 consumption. Okay? And when I mean 196 00:06:41,399 --> 00:06:45,679 aggregate demand, okay, 197 00:06:43,519 --> 00:06:47,399 I'll be 198 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:49,759 I'll pause for a for a slide. Let me let 199 00:06:47,399 --> 00:06:51,599 me go over the definition. Consumption, 200 00:06:49,759 --> 00:06:53,959 we're going to denote by C, 201 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:57,360 is the goods and services purchased by 202 00:06:53,959 --> 00:06:59,199 consumers. Okay? Households and so on. 203 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:00,759 Investment, which we're going to denote 204 00:06:59,199 --> 00:07:02,879 by I, 205 00:07:00,759 --> 00:07:05,639 is the sum of non-residential and 206 00:07:02,879 --> 00:07:08,079 residential investment. So, equipment 207 00:07:05,639 --> 00:07:09,319 and establish and and and you know, 208 00:07:08,079 --> 00:07:11,159 factories 209 00:07:09,319 --> 00:07:12,879 on one side, and then residential 210 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:14,760 investment is houses. 211 00:07:12,879 --> 00:07:15,800 Stuff like that, apartment buildings and 212 00:07:14,759 --> 00:07:17,439 so on. 213 00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:19,199 Which is also these are goods and 214 00:07:17,439 --> 00:07:21,240 services as well. They're just capital 215 00:07:19,199 --> 00:07:22,800 goods and so on, but they're also goods 216 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:24,319 and services. 217 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:26,600 Government spending, that's what we're 218 00:07:24,319 --> 00:07:28,519 going to denote by G, are purchases of 219 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:31,160 goods and services by the federal, 220 00:07:28,519 --> 00:07:32,680 state, and local government. Okay? 221 00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:35,320 Excluding, and that's important, 222 00:07:32,680 --> 00:07:36,759 government transfers. 223 00:07:35,319 --> 00:07:38,399 What is a government transfer? Many of 224 00:07:36,759 --> 00:07:39,360 you may have received that during COVID. 225 00:07:38,399 --> 00:07:42,120 You know, the government sent you a 226 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:43,879 check, for example. Okay? 227 00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:45,920 Well, that check that is not part of 228 00:07:43,879 --> 00:07:46,719 government expenditure. That check is 229 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,480 like a 230 00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:50,080 it's a negative tax and it's going to 231 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:51,680 enter somewhere else. 232 00:07:50,079 --> 00:07:54,639 When we mean government 233 00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:57,600 expenditure is is things the government 234 00:07:54,639 --> 00:08:00,719 purchases, services the government 235 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,879 acquires and so on. Okay? 236 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:05,480 Um 237 00:08:01,879 --> 00:08:07,240 then exports, X, which will play no role 238 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:09,480 until seven lectures or eight lectures 239 00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:10,879 from now, or actually 10 lectures from 240 00:08:09,480 --> 00:08:13,439 now probably, 241 00:08:10,879 --> 00:08:17,199 is purchases of US goods and services, 242 00:08:13,439 --> 00:08:18,360 that is goods produced by US factories, 243 00:08:17,199 --> 00:08:19,439 uh 244 00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:22,960 uh 245 00:08:19,439 --> 00:08:22,959 by foreigners. Okay? 246 00:08:24,079 --> 00:08:30,159 I am is the other side of the story. 247 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:32,879 Imports is the purchase of foreign goods 248 00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:35,399 and services by US consumers, US firms, 249 00:08:32,879 --> 00:08:36,879 US government. Okay? So, when you buy 250 00:08:35,399 --> 00:08:39,038 something that is produced in Germany, 251 00:08:36,879 --> 00:08:40,120 well, that's an import. When the Germans 252 00:08:39,038 --> 00:08:42,960 buy something that is produced in the 253 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:44,320 US, that's an export. Okay? 254 00:08:42,960 --> 00:08:45,840 And then the last component is something 255 00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:47,120 we're going to going to pay any 256 00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:49,639 attention whatsoever in this course, 257 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:51,480 which is inventory investment. Inventory 258 00:08:49,639 --> 00:08:53,199 investment is certainly 259 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:54,759 it's almost accidental. There is some 260 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:56,600 planning on it, but but there is a lot 261 00:08:54,759 --> 00:08:58,840 of it's just from the difference between 262 00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:00,639 sales and production. And over the very 263 00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:02,040 short run, there's lots of difference. I 264 00:09:00,639 --> 00:09:03,919 mean, you're not 265 00:09:02,039 --> 00:09:05,719 producing unless you're in a bakery, you 266 00:09:03,919 --> 00:09:07,240 know, you're not producing and selling 267 00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:08,680 immediately. There is there is certain 268 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,720 certain lags. 269 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,959 That's a small thing. It it's volatile, 270 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:13,920 but it's a small thing, so we're going 271 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:15,240 to ignore it 272 00:09:13,919 --> 00:09:17,479 for this this course. We're going to 273 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:18,919 assume actually, unless we explicitly 274 00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:20,879 say the contrary, and that could show up 275 00:09:18,919 --> 00:09:21,959 in a piece that it would never show in a 276 00:09:20,879 --> 00:09:23,480 quiz, 277 00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:24,840 because it's not that important, we're 278 00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:26,800 going to assume that this inventory 279 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:29,000 investment is equal to zero. 280 00:09:26,799 --> 00:09:30,799 Also, for this part of the course, until 281 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:32,919 further notice, we're going to assume 282 00:09:30,799 --> 00:09:34,279 that exports and imports are equal to 283 00:09:32,919 --> 00:09:36,599 zero as well. 284 00:09:34,279 --> 00:09:39,799 That's not realistic, but it's easier to 285 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:41,840 analyze what we call a closed economy. 286 00:09:39,799 --> 00:09:44,159 Okay? An economy that is not interacting 287 00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:45,519 with the rest of the world. In the in 288 00:09:44,159 --> 00:09:47,000 again, 10 lectures from now, we're going 289 00:09:45,519 --> 00:09:48,000 to open the economy to the rest of the 290 00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:49,360 world, and then we're going to have to 291 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,559 talk about 292 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:53,680 things like import, export, exchange 293 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:55,959 rates, things of that kind. But for now, 294 00:09:53,679 --> 00:09:57,839 let's keep it simple. Okay? 295 00:09:55,960 --> 00:10:00,879 So, now you So, you get a sense this is 296 00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:02,200 for 2018, but I I mean the the totals 297 00:10:00,879 --> 00:10:03,679 change, but the composition doesn't 298 00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:05,480 change very much 299 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:08,000 of GDP. 300 00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:08,000 Okay. 301 00:10:08,919 --> 00:10:12,759 Of of GDP 302 00:10:11,399 --> 00:10:16,079 output 303 00:10:12,759 --> 00:10:19,120 aggregate demand they're all the same 304 00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:21,480 in equilibrium, but we'll get there. 305 00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:24,799 GDP you see that consumption accounts 306 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:26,879 for a big chunk close to 70% of 307 00:10:24,799 --> 00:10:28,439 aggregate demand. That's the reason 308 00:10:26,879 --> 00:10:30,159 people worry so much about consumer 309 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:32,320 sentiment and so on. The 310 00:10:30,159 --> 00:10:34,159 University of Michigan 311 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:35,800 has many claims to fame, but one of them 312 00:10:34,159 --> 00:10:37,719 is they produce this index of consumer 313 00:10:35,799 --> 00:10:39,439 sentiment, and everyone is watching that 314 00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:41,080 thing. Anyone that worries about macro 315 00:10:39,440 --> 00:10:43,640 or finance is watching that thing 316 00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:47,080 because it tells you a lot about one of 317 00:10:43,639 --> 00:10:49,879 the main drivers of output equilibrium 318 00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:52,720 output. Then you see investment is 319 00:10:49,879 --> 00:10:55,000 substantially smaller, but it's large in 320 00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:56,840 particular non-residential investment. 321 00:10:55,000 --> 00:11:00,519 Government expenditure is a big 322 00:10:56,840 --> 00:11:01,960 component of aggregate demand. And then 323 00:11:00,519 --> 00:11:04,480 I'm not going to worry too much about 324 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:07,560 for a country like the US the open 325 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:11,639 openness part is is relatively small. 326 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:11,639 If you go to uh you know 327 00:11:11,759 --> 00:11:16,519 small a small economy typically will 328 00:11:14,519 --> 00:11:18,039 have sort of very large exports relative 329 00:11:16,519 --> 00:11:21,240 to GDP and so on. But that's not the 330 00:11:18,039 --> 00:11:23,719 case of the US. 331 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:25,399 And there you see why we're going to set 332 00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:27,920 in inventory investment to zero. It's a 333 00:11:25,399 --> 00:11:30,079 small thing. It it moves a lot more than 334 00:11:27,919 --> 00:11:32,639 than its size, so it can account for for 335 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:34,879 fluctuations in in 336 00:11:32,639 --> 00:11:36,838 sort of the monthly level of GDP, but 337 00:11:34,879 --> 00:11:39,838 it's not that important 338 00:11:36,839 --> 00:11:41,480 in a slightly longer periods of time. 339 00:11:39,839 --> 00:11:44,200 Okay. So, that's more or less the story. 340 00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:47,279 So, now this is the this is the model. 341 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:48,520 Please stop me say if you Is there 342 00:11:47,279 --> 00:11:50,199 anything here you don't understand 343 00:11:48,519 --> 00:11:51,720 because any everything that we'll build 344 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:53,120 from here to 345 00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:56,000 quiz one 346 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:58,200 will build on understanding this what 347 00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:00,480 I'm about to say. Very simple, but if 348 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:01,640 you miss a step here everything is going 349 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:02,800 to be confusing in the next few 350 00:12:01,639 --> 00:12:04,159 lectures. So, 351 00:12:02,799 --> 00:12:05,799 and you're not supposed to understand it 352 00:12:04,159 --> 00:12:07,919 in the first run. So, so it's okay that 353 00:12:05,799 --> 00:12:10,479 you ask me. But let's make sure that you 354 00:12:07,919 --> 00:12:12,719 understand what's going on here. 355 00:12:10,480 --> 00:12:14,399 Okay. So, that's aggregate demand. First 356 00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:17,080 definitions. We're going to denote 357 00:12:14,399 --> 00:12:18,600 aggregate demand by this Z, okay? Letter 358 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:21,560 Z. 359 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:23,440 And aggregate demand is going to be When 360 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:25,359 we say aggregate demand, remember what 361 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:27,640 what what is the exercise we're trying 362 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:30,720 to do. Ultimately, what we want to 363 00:12:27,639 --> 00:12:32,879 determine is the output the production 364 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:34,360 of the US economy, say. 365 00:12:32,879 --> 00:12:35,679 So, when we mean when we talk about 366 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:38,080 aggregate demand, we're trying to 367 00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:39,919 determine the demand for domestically 368 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,080 produced goods for goods produced in the 369 00:12:39,919 --> 00:12:43,199 US. 370 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:44,759 That's what we're trying to pin down. 371 00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:46,640 And so, 372 00:12:44,759 --> 00:12:48,439 that's the reason aggregate demand looks 373 00:12:46,639 --> 00:12:50,559 like that. It's well, consumers. 374 00:12:48,440 --> 00:12:52,280 Consumers are going to demand goods. 375 00:12:50,559 --> 00:12:55,279 Investment 376 00:12:52,279 --> 00:12:56,519 G plus exports. If foreign demand US 377 00:12:55,279 --> 00:12:57,679 goods, that's also increases US 378 00:12:56,519 --> 00:13:01,519 production. 379 00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:04,319 Minus imports because imports is 380 00:13:01,519 --> 00:13:06,838 uh goods and services that consumers, 381 00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:08,440 firms, and governments sort of buy from 382 00:13:06,839 --> 00:13:10,400 foreigners, but they're not produced by 383 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:12,720 by US companies. So, they are not affect 384 00:13:10,399 --> 00:13:14,919 the determination of equilibrium output 385 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:17,600 in the US. Okay? That's the reason you 386 00:13:14,919 --> 00:13:19,079 subtract it. Now, that distinction is 387 00:13:17,600 --> 00:13:21,200 not going to matter 388 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:23,160 uh until 10 lectures from now because 389 00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:25,520 we're going to set X and IM equal to 390 00:13:23,159 --> 00:13:27,279 zero from the point of view of modeling. 391 00:13:25,519 --> 00:13:29,399 So, all demand is demand for 392 00:13:27,279 --> 00:13:31,399 domestically produced goods in this part 393 00:13:29,399 --> 00:13:34,919 of the course. Okay? So, aggregate 394 00:13:31,399 --> 00:13:36,679 demand for us will be this C plus I plus 395 00:13:34,919 --> 00:13:39,399 G. So, we need to understand what 396 00:13:36,679 --> 00:13:41,199 determines C plus I plus G. 397 00:13:39,399 --> 00:13:43,159 And at least initially, we're going to 398 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:44,520 keep it very very simple. We're not 399 00:13:43,159 --> 00:13:46,719 going to think too much about what 400 00:13:44,519 --> 00:13:48,199 determines investment. In fact, we're 401 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,720 going to assume it's a constant is 402 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:51,280 given. So, it's determined somewhere 403 00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:53,000 else not in the model I'm about to 404 00:13:51,279 --> 00:13:55,319 solve. 405 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:56,919 Government expenditure 406 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,080 the same. I'm going to assume you know, 407 00:13:56,919 --> 00:14:00,519 it's determined by some other 408 00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:01,800 priorities, you know, green agendas and 409 00:14:00,519 --> 00:14:05,319 stuff like that. It has very little to 410 00:14:01,799 --> 00:14:07,359 do with with with what we're doing here. 411 00:14:05,320 --> 00:14:08,839 And then taxes is something that doesn't 412 00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:10,800 show up there, but it will show up very 413 00:14:08,839 --> 00:14:12,640 shortly. We're also going to assume that 414 00:14:10,799 --> 00:14:14,719 they're being determined somewhere else. 415 00:14:12,639 --> 00:14:16,639 In pieces and later on in the course 416 00:14:14,720 --> 00:14:19,200 we're going to endogenize all that, but 417 00:14:16,639 --> 00:14:21,319 not now. Let's assume I'm trying to come 418 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:22,920 up with a the simplest possible model of 419 00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:24,680 aggregate demand. 420 00:14:22,919 --> 00:14:27,599 And I'm making two of these terms 421 00:14:24,679 --> 00:14:30,399 trivial just constants. Okay? And I'm 422 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:31,839 going to focus all my effort here in 423 00:14:30,399 --> 00:14:34,480 this component here, which I already 424 00:14:31,839 --> 00:14:35,680 told you is the most important component 425 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,800 of aggregate demand, which is 426 00:14:35,679 --> 00:14:39,599 consumption. Okay? 427 00:14:37,799 --> 00:14:41,000 So, we're going to assume here we're 428 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:42,279 going to have a function. Something has 429 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:44,879 to move so for the model to be 430 00:14:42,279 --> 00:14:47,159 interesting. So, this this this we're 431 00:14:44,879 --> 00:14:49,320 going to assume that consumption 432 00:14:47,159 --> 00:14:51,078 is an increasing function of disposable 433 00:14:49,320 --> 00:14:52,640 income. I'm about to define what 434 00:14:51,078 --> 00:14:53,958 disposable income is, but you can 435 00:14:52,639 --> 00:14:56,799 imagine what it is. It's something you 436 00:14:53,958 --> 00:14:58,239 can use to consume and so on. So, very 437 00:14:56,799 --> 00:14:59,879 naturally, if you have a higher 438 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,839 disposable income, you're going to 439 00:14:59,879 --> 00:15:03,600 consume more. That's what this says. 440 00:15:01,839 --> 00:15:05,680 Okay? 441 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,200 In reality, that consumption function is 442 00:15:05,679 --> 00:15:09,279 a lot more complex. There are lots of 443 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,680 things that enter there that that we're 444 00:15:09,279 --> 00:15:14,439 not modeling for now. But let's 445 00:15:11,679 --> 00:15:15,719 start from the basics. Okay? So, that's 446 00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:17,360 going to be the only behavioral 447 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:18,639 assumption we're going to make for a 448 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:21,959 while. 449 00:15:18,639 --> 00:15:24,720 That that the consumers consume more 450 00:15:21,958 --> 00:15:27,078 when they have more disposable income. 451 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:27,079 Okay. 452 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:31,720 And I'm going to make it even simpler. 453 00:15:29,480 --> 00:15:34,159 I'm going to assume that consumption is 454 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:36,399 a linear function of disposable income. 455 00:15:34,159 --> 00:15:38,838 Okay? So, there's going to be some 456 00:15:36,399 --> 00:15:40,159 constant C0, which captures lots of 457 00:15:38,839 --> 00:15:42,360 things that we're not modeling here. For 458 00:15:40,159 --> 00:15:44,360 example, the fact that for any given 459 00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:47,240 level of disposable income, 460 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:48,959 if you know, if you if you 461 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:51,120 if you're richer, suppose you have some 462 00:15:48,958 --> 00:15:52,479 shares and now the shares double in 463 00:15:51,120 --> 00:15:53,720 value, you probably are going to consume 464 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:55,200 more as well. 465 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,160 Okay? There are lots of other things 466 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:58,200 that affect 467 00:15:56,159 --> 00:16:01,919 consumption, which are different from 468 00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:02,959 aside from your disposable income. 469 00:16:01,919 --> 00:16:03,958 But we're not going to model that. So, 470 00:16:02,958 --> 00:16:05,799 that's we're going to call it 471 00:16:03,958 --> 00:16:07,119 autonomous. Autonomous in the sense that 472 00:16:05,799 --> 00:16:08,399 we're not going to determine it here. 473 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:10,279 We're going to take it as a parameter 474 00:16:08,399 --> 00:16:12,078 that comes from somewhere else. We may 475 00:16:10,279 --> 00:16:15,639 do some experiments moving that variable 476 00:16:12,078 --> 00:16:17,958 around, but it's not going to 477 00:16:15,639 --> 00:16:19,958 be part of what we model. 478 00:16:17,958 --> 00:16:21,479 C1 is a more interesting parameter for 479 00:16:19,958 --> 00:16:23,119 this part of the course, and it's what 480 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:25,159 we call the marginal propensity to 481 00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:27,560 consume 482 00:16:25,159 --> 00:16:30,759 out of disposable income in this case. 483 00:16:27,559 --> 00:16:32,159 That is C1 tells you the share if you 484 00:16:30,759 --> 00:16:34,439 get an extra dollar of disposable 485 00:16:32,159 --> 00:16:37,319 income, how much of that do you spend in 486 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:41,480 consumption? Okay? So, say you get an 487 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:44,200 extra dollar of income, if you spend 488 00:16:41,480 --> 00:16:47,039 60 cents in in the things you normally 489 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:49,640 consume of that extra dollar, well, then 490 00:16:47,039 --> 00:16:51,559 your C1 is .6. Okay? That's the marginal 491 00:16:49,639 --> 00:16:52,919 propensity to consume. 492 00:16:51,559 --> 00:16:54,359 And that's what gives us our increasing 493 00:16:52,919 --> 00:16:55,719 function. You get an extra dollar, 494 00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:56,839 you're going to do you're going to save 495 00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:58,639 part, but some of it you're going to 496 00:16:56,839 --> 00:17:02,920 spend. That part you're going to spend 497 00:16:58,639 --> 00:17:04,240 is the C1 that we have there. Okay? 498 00:17:02,919 --> 00:17:06,720 Good. 499 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:06,720 Uh 500 00:17:07,559 --> 00:17:10,639 And I 501 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:12,560 Now, let me tell you what how we define 502 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,480 disposable income. Disposable income is 503 00:17:12,559 --> 00:17:16,039 just equal to income, which is equal to 504 00:17:14,480 --> 00:17:18,400 production, you 505 00:17:16,039 --> 00:17:20,838 minus taxes. That's disposable income. 506 00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:24,519 Okay? It's whatever you earn as a either 507 00:17:20,838 --> 00:17:25,958 as a worker as a capital owner, 508 00:17:24,519 --> 00:17:27,400 well, then the government takes its 509 00:17:25,959 --> 00:17:29,400 something out of it. That's your 510 00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:31,160 disposable income, and that's where you 511 00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:32,679 have to decide how much to save and how 512 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:34,080 much to consume. 513 00:17:32,679 --> 00:17:35,720 Okay? 514 00:17:34,079 --> 00:17:37,519 That's 515 00:17:35,720 --> 00:17:38,839 So, so that means that our consumption 516 00:17:37,519 --> 00:17:40,519 function is 517 00:17:38,839 --> 00:17:43,199 can be written that way 518 00:17:40,519 --> 00:17:45,599 after all these assumptions I made, you 519 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:47,600 know, equal to this autonomous component 520 00:17:45,599 --> 00:17:49,359 plus C1 the marginal propensity to 521 00:17:47,599 --> 00:17:54,639 consume times 522 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:54,639 uh income output minus taxes. 523 00:17:56,599 --> 00:18:00,000 Is it clear? 524 00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:01,599 Yes? 525 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:03,079 So, all these are assumptions. Now, 526 00:18:01,599 --> 00:18:04,678 they're not crazy assumptions in the 527 00:18:03,079 --> 00:18:06,240 sense that you know, that we know that 528 00:18:04,679 --> 00:18:07,679 that there is a relationship between 529 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:09,319 these two things. Again, 530 00:18:07,679 --> 00:18:11,160 the consumption function in practice is 531 00:18:09,319 --> 00:18:13,359 much richer than that. 532 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:15,840 And there is lots of randomness random 533 00:18:13,359 --> 00:18:17,559 terms around and so on, but that's not 534 00:18:15,839 --> 00:18:18,919 what we're about here. 535 00:18:17,559 --> 00:18:20,399 But that's if you want to start with a 536 00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:24,519 consumption function, this is a pretty 537 00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:25,920 reasonable one to start with. Okay? 538 00:18:24,519 --> 00:18:28,559 Okay. So, that's going to look in the 539 00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:30,080 space of disposable income or income. I 540 00:18:28,559 --> 00:18:31,559 could have put income there not 541 00:18:30,079 --> 00:18:33,158 disposable income. So, it's going to 542 00:18:31,559 --> 00:18:34,759 look like that. 543 00:18:33,159 --> 00:18:37,800 Okay? 544 00:18:34,759 --> 00:18:39,039 So, C0 is that autonomous consumption is 545 00:18:37,799 --> 00:18:40,559 some something you're going to consume 546 00:18:39,039 --> 00:18:41,519 regardless of your level of disposable 547 00:18:40,559 --> 00:18:43,879 income. I mean, there is a minimum 548 00:18:41,519 --> 00:18:46,200 consumption you have to have. You know, 549 00:18:43,880 --> 00:18:47,880 say. And then 550 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:50,159 and then 551 00:18:47,880 --> 00:18:52,240 the slope of that is is the marginal 552 00:18:50,159 --> 00:18:55,880 propensity to consume, which is C1, 553 00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:55,880 which is a number between zero and one. 554 00:18:57,119 --> 00:19:02,039 Okay. So, let's let's determine 555 00:18:59,079 --> 00:19:02,039 equilibrium output. 556 00:19:02,159 --> 00:19:07,640 So, we have aggregate demand, which is C 557 00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:09,440 plus I plus G. Okay? 558 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:11,000 There we are. 559 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:12,759 That's that was our definition of 560 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:14,519 aggregate demand. 561 00:19:12,759 --> 00:19:16,319 Uh I'm going to stick in now the 562 00:19:14,519 --> 00:19:18,759 functional forms. Well, these guys are 563 00:19:16,319 --> 00:19:20,799 very boring. They're constants. And I'm 564 00:19:18,759 --> 00:19:23,559 plugging in here the the consumption the 565 00:19:20,799 --> 00:19:27,519 consumption function. Okay? So, what we 566 00:19:23,559 --> 00:19:29,879 have here is that aggregate demand 567 00:19:27,519 --> 00:19:32,000 is an increasing function of output or 568 00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:33,400 income. Okay? 569 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:35,919 It's also a function of taxes, 570 00:19:33,400 --> 00:19:37,679 investment, and so on, but but it's an 571 00:19:35,919 --> 00:19:39,679 increasing function of output. And And 572 00:19:37,679 --> 00:19:42,519 this is important because I'm Remember, 573 00:19:39,679 --> 00:19:44,600 the the goal of this is to find 574 00:19:42,519 --> 00:19:46,400 equilibrium output. 575 00:19:44,599 --> 00:19:48,879 So, here I have on the right hand side 576 00:19:46,400 --> 00:19:51,519 of my aggregate demand 577 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:53,600 output. That's good. I have one equation 578 00:19:51,519 --> 00:19:55,759 in which output shows up. 579 00:19:53,599 --> 00:19:57,359 Okay? Now, I cannot find equilibrium 580 00:19:55,759 --> 00:19:59,720 output just from this equation. Why is 581 00:19:57,359 --> 00:19:59,719 that? 582 00:20:00,319 --> 00:20:03,359 So, I'm Remember, we're trying to build 583 00:20:02,039 --> 00:20:05,119 a model 584 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:07,879 to find 585 00:20:05,119 --> 00:20:09,759 equilibrium output. 586 00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:11,400 That's our goal. That's what will tell 587 00:20:09,759 --> 00:20:13,039 us whether we're in a recession or not. 588 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:15,960 Output is low, recession. Output is 589 00:20:13,039 --> 00:20:17,599 high, we're in a boom. 590 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:19,960 Obviously, I cannot solve it from this. 591 00:20:17,599 --> 00:20:23,079 I have two unknowns. 592 00:20:19,960 --> 00:20:25,519 What are my two unknowns? 593 00:20:23,079 --> 00:20:29,240 Two unknowns, one equation. 594 00:20:25,519 --> 00:20:29,240 What is my second unknown there? 595 00:20:37,039 --> 00:20:41,879 Aggregate demand, of course. We have to 596 00:20:39,319 --> 00:20:42,839 determine Z and Y. 597 00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:45,160 Okay? 598 00:20:42,839 --> 00:20:46,279 So, how are we going to do that? 599 00:20:45,160 --> 00:20:48,600 Well, 600 00:20:46,279 --> 00:20:50,160 using a second equation, which is the 601 00:20:48,599 --> 00:20:52,159 equilibrium condition. It's not a 602 00:20:50,160 --> 00:20:53,400 function. This is a function. This is 603 00:20:52,160 --> 00:20:56,560 not a function. This is an equilibrium 604 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:59,120 condition. It says, "In equilibrium, not 605 00:20:56,559 --> 00:21:02,799 outside equilibrium. In equilibrium, 606 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:03,919 output is equal to aggregate demand." 607 00:21:02,799 --> 00:21:05,159 Okay? 608 00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:07,160 That's what this 609 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,519 equilibrium condition tells us. Off 610 00:21:07,160 --> 00:21:10,120 equilibrium, this doesn't hold. That's 611 00:21:08,519 --> 00:21:12,799 the reason this is not a function. This 612 00:21:10,119 --> 00:21:14,079 holds everywhere. It's a function. 613 00:21:12,799 --> 00:21:16,599 This is an equilibrium condition. It 614 00:21:14,079 --> 00:21:18,679 says, "At equilibrium, aggregate demand 615 00:21:16,599 --> 00:21:19,919 is equal to output." 616 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:23,840 So, now we're done because we have two 617 00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:23,840 equations with two unknowns. Okay? 618 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:27,920 Good. 619 00:21:25,799 --> 00:21:29,839 And the reason I post on this is that I 620 00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:30,920 see that mistake made often. 621 00:21:29,839 --> 00:21:32,959 Okay? 622 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:34,840 That this is interpreted as a function. 623 00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:36,840 It's not. It's an equilibrium condition. 624 00:21:34,839 --> 00:21:38,480 At equilibrium, it holds. And that you 625 00:21:36,839 --> 00:21:40,159 can see, actually, I'm going to 626 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:42,920 illustrate the same point in in the 627 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:44,440 diagram. So, this is the 628 00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:46,920 Let me Let me keep going. So, this is 629 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:48,640 clear, no? So, this is This is just a 630 00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:50,360 summary of what we had in the previous 631 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:53,000 slides. It's 632 00:21:50,359 --> 00:21:55,159 And this is the new thing here, which is 633 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,920 in equilibrium, output is equal to 634 00:21:55,160 --> 00:22:00,320 aggregate demand. 635 00:21:56,920 --> 00:22:02,120 And and and the and the 636 00:22:00,319 --> 00:22:04,359 And again, that's what makes 637 00:22:02,119 --> 00:22:07,319 this a really a short 638 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:08,959 short-run model. You see, I'm saying 639 00:22:07,319 --> 00:22:12,359 output in the short run is whatever 640 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:12,360 demand wants it to be. 641 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:17,040 Which is different from from from 642 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:18,678 the long run that says, "No, no. Hold on 643 00:22:17,039 --> 00:22:20,159 a second. I mean, but you 644 00:22:18,679 --> 00:22:21,920 How much output you can produce is a 645 00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,279 function of the capital you have, of the 646 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:24,320 workers you have." Yeah, yeah, that's 647 00:22:23,279 --> 00:22:26,079 true in the long run. But in the short 648 00:22:24,319 --> 00:22:27,879 run, you have lots of flexibility 649 00:22:26,079 --> 00:22:29,000 because you have lots of unused capacity 650 00:22:27,880 --> 00:22:31,280 and so on. 651 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:33,039 Okay? So, this is pretty It's a big 652 00:22:31,279 --> 00:22:35,799 assumption, and there is schools of 653 00:22:33,039 --> 00:22:37,920 thoughts within microeconomy that split 654 00:22:35,799 --> 00:22:40,039 by this assumption, whether you believe 655 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:43,080 that that that in the short run, output 656 00:22:40,039 --> 00:22:45,279 is aggregate demand determined or not. 657 00:22:43,079 --> 00:22:47,159 At MIT, we tend to believe that in the 658 00:22:45,279 --> 00:22:48,839 short run. The long run, no. But in the 659 00:22:47,160 --> 00:22:51,120 short run, that's what it does. 660 00:22:48,839 --> 00:22:53,480 Now, sometimes the long run gets to you 661 00:22:51,119 --> 00:22:54,599 very quickly. And at this point, we're 662 00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:55,960 in a situation like that. That's the 663 00:22:54,599 --> 00:22:57,000 reason we're seeing inflation and so on, 664 00:22:55,960 --> 00:22:58,039 but that's something you'll understand 665 00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:01,559 later on. 666 00:22:58,039 --> 00:23:03,159 Okay? But but but for now, so this is 667 00:23:01,559 --> 00:23:04,559 this is important. We're going to We're 668 00:23:03,160 --> 00:23:06,200 saying here 669 00:23:04,559 --> 00:23:07,519 output I don't need another equation. I 670 00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,880 could have done aggregate demand like 671 00:23:07,519 --> 00:23:11,000 this, and then output a function of 672 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:12,160 capital, labor, lots of things. 673 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:14,519 I'm not going to even do that. I'm going 674 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:17,480 to say, "No, no. Output will be whatever 675 00:23:14,519 --> 00:23:18,759 demand wants it to be." Okay? 676 00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:20,480 And that means in equilibrium, they have 677 00:23:18,759 --> 00:23:21,440 to be equal. 678 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:24,360 Good. 679 00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:24,360 You had a question. 680 00:23:28,079 --> 00:23:31,439 No, they are the same for us. 681 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:35,840 That's our definition. GDP for us is 682 00:23:33,920 --> 00:23:38,039 output. 683 00:23:35,839 --> 00:23:39,199 So, when I say aggregate output, I mean 684 00:23:38,039 --> 00:23:41,119 GDP. 685 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:43,200 Remember? Real GDP. We're talking all 686 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:44,239 about real GDP. Okay? 687 00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:46,039 Uh 688 00:23:44,240 --> 00:23:47,519 And it's also equal to income. Not 689 00:23:46,039 --> 00:23:49,240 disposable, but it's equal to income. 690 00:23:47,519 --> 00:23:50,639 Remember when we did those little tables 691 00:23:49,240 --> 00:23:52,079 where we look on our 692 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:55,160 the three different ways of doing it? 693 00:23:52,079 --> 00:23:56,879 Well, the first two were output. 694 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:58,800 And the last one was income, and they 695 00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:59,960 had to be the same. 696 00:23:58,799 --> 00:24:04,480 Okay? 697 00:23:59,960 --> 00:24:04,480 So, why is real GDP for us? 698 00:24:04,559 --> 00:24:07,759 That's real GDP. 699 00:24:07,960 --> 00:24:13,240 What happens in the table I show you, 700 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:14,600 I already used the fact that real GDP is 701 00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:15,799 equal to aggregate demand, and that's 702 00:24:14,599 --> 00:24:17,799 the reason I show you the different 703 00:24:15,799 --> 00:24:20,720 components of Z. 704 00:24:17,799 --> 00:24:23,720 I show you that, that, and that. 705 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:23,720 Okay? But in equilibrium, they're equal. 706 00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:32,520 There's really a figure that that will 707 00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:34,880 clarify, I think, a lot of that. But 708 00:24:32,519 --> 00:24:36,599 let's Let me keep solving this. So, 709 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:38,360 we have that And so, what I'm going to 710 00:24:36,599 --> 00:24:39,759 do next is just solve it. So, we have 711 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:42,519 this equilibrium condition. I'm going to 712 00:24:39,759 --> 00:24:43,440 plug in my aggregate demand function 713 00:24:42,519 --> 00:24:45,359 here, 714 00:24:43,440 --> 00:24:47,120 and so I can solve out for equilibrium 715 00:24:45,359 --> 00:24:48,678 output. And here we have the first for 716 00:24:47,119 --> 00:24:50,919 the first time in this course, an 717 00:24:48,679 --> 00:24:52,160 equation for equilibrium output. 718 00:24:50,920 --> 00:24:55,600 There you are. That's your equilibrium 719 00:24:52,160 --> 00:24:55,600 output in this economy. 720 00:24:56,160 --> 00:24:58,519 Okay? 721 00:24:58,880 --> 00:25:02,880 Now, this guy here 722 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:04,679 is very famous, 723 00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:06,679 and is very macro. 724 00:25:04,679 --> 00:25:11,560 Doesn't happen in micro. It happens in 725 00:25:06,679 --> 00:25:11,560 macro only. Okay? This guy here. 726 00:25:11,880 --> 00:25:16,280 Another guy there is called the 727 00:25:13,400 --> 00:25:16,280 multiplier. 728 00:25:16,440 --> 00:25:18,559 Okay? 729 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:24,480 And it's a very important macro concept. 730 00:25:20,880 --> 00:25:24,480 A huge concept in macro. 731 00:25:24,799 --> 00:25:28,678 Now, why do you think it's called a 732 00:25:26,200 --> 00:25:29,720 multiplier? 733 00:25:28,679 --> 00:25:32,160 Well, obviously, it multiplies 734 00:25:29,720 --> 00:25:34,079 something, but a multiplier sounds like, 735 00:25:32,160 --> 00:25:36,080 you know, 736 00:25:34,079 --> 00:25:38,599 that multiplies that makes something 737 00:25:36,079 --> 00:25:38,599 bigger, no? 738 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:45,678 So, what happens if C1 is 739 00:25:42,400 --> 00:25:45,679 uh greater than zero? 740 00:25:48,240 --> 00:25:51,559 Is What happens if C1 is greater than 741 00:25:50,079 --> 00:25:53,439 zero? Remember, it's between zero and 742 00:25:51,559 --> 00:25:54,879 one. But what happens if it's greater 743 00:25:53,440 --> 00:25:59,559 than zero? What happened with that 744 00:25:54,880 --> 00:25:59,560 number there, one over one minus C1? 745 00:26:02,559 --> 00:26:06,039 It's greater than one. That's what this 746 00:26:04,079 --> 00:26:07,240 is. It multiplies. Okay? So, that's the 747 00:26:06,039 --> 00:26:09,759 reason we call it a multiplier. There's 748 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:11,519 not nothing deep there. Uh okay? So, 749 00:26:09,759 --> 00:26:12,720 this thing here is sort of autonomous 750 00:26:11,519 --> 00:26:14,279 stuff, you know? It's what the 751 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:15,679 government spends, what firms are 752 00:26:14,279 --> 00:26:19,399 spending, capital. 753 00:26:15,679 --> 00:26:21,600 This is autonomous consumption. Uh 754 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:24,759 And this Actually, this is a typo there. 755 00:26:21,599 --> 00:26:25,959 There should be a C1 in front of that. 756 00:26:24,759 --> 00:26:28,480 Typo. 757 00:26:25,960 --> 00:26:29,559 It comes from there. C1 times 758 00:26:28,480 --> 00:26:31,240 T. 759 00:26:29,559 --> 00:26:33,000 So, fix that typo, please. I I'm going 760 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:35,920 to upload the slides again with with the 761 00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:35,920 typo fixed. Okay? 762 00:26:36,799 --> 00:26:42,240 I'm just It comes from here. C1 times T. 763 00:26:40,679 --> 00:26:44,160 Okay, so that's what this does. It 764 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:45,679 multiplies. So, whatever it is that that 765 00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:47,800 is happening here, whatever it is that 766 00:26:45,679 --> 00:26:49,759 the government is spending or whatever, 767 00:26:47,799 --> 00:26:53,879 this term multiplies it. And that's a 768 00:26:49,759 --> 00:26:55,879 huge thing. Uh There was a big debate uh 769 00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:57,160 almost always when you're trying to get 770 00:26:55,880 --> 00:26:58,920 out of a recession and the governments 771 00:26:57,160 --> 00:27:00,880 are spending, a big question is, "Well, 772 00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:02,120 how big is the multiplier?" If the 773 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:03,840 multiplier is small, you're going to 774 00:27:02,119 --> 00:27:05,799 have to spend a lot to get the economy 775 00:27:03,839 --> 00:27:07,759 out of the recession. If the multiplier 776 00:27:05,799 --> 00:27:09,960 is large, 777 00:27:07,759 --> 00:27:11,519 then then uh 778 00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:13,000 you you're going to have have to spend 779 00:27:11,519 --> 00:27:14,759 very little, and then the multiplier 780 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:16,759 will take you away from from that 781 00:27:14,759 --> 00:27:18,119 recession. 782 00:27:16,759 --> 00:27:20,960 So, what is it that makes the multiplier 783 00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:20,959 large or small? 784 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:27,679 Well, mechanically, when is it that 785 00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:30,119 multiplier large? 786 00:27:27,679 --> 00:27:31,440 When C1 is closer to one. So, when when 787 00:27:30,119 --> 00:27:34,199 people are spending more of their income 788 00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:35,840 on Exactly. When C1 is large. 789 00:27:34,200 --> 00:27:38,480 And that that gives you the logic, and 790 00:27:35,839 --> 00:27:40,039 that's very important in macro. It's 791 00:27:38,480 --> 00:27:42,720 Why is it that a big multiplier? Well, 792 00:27:40,039 --> 00:27:45,119 because think what happens in macro. If 793 00:27:42,720 --> 00:27:47,640 the government spends, 794 00:27:45,119 --> 00:27:49,879 that increases output. 795 00:27:47,640 --> 00:27:51,560 But now, output increases income. And if 796 00:27:49,880 --> 00:27:52,960 consumers spend a big share of their 797 00:27:51,559 --> 00:27:55,039 extra income 798 00:27:52,960 --> 00:27:57,120 in output and consumption again, then 799 00:27:55,039 --> 00:27:59,279 that increases output again, which 800 00:27:57,119 --> 00:28:00,519 increases income again, and 801 00:27:59,279 --> 00:28:01,799 you keep going. 802 00:28:00,519 --> 00:28:03,119 Okay? 803 00:28:01,799 --> 00:28:04,839 So, that's the sequence. On the 804 00:28:03,119 --> 00:28:06,079 contrary, if consumers are very scared, 805 00:28:04,839 --> 00:28:07,599 they don't want to spend any extra 806 00:28:06,079 --> 00:28:09,759 dollar they receive, anything of the 807 00:28:07,599 --> 00:28:11,879 extra dollar they receive, then you 808 00:28:09,759 --> 00:28:13,839 don't get any multiplier because this 809 00:28:11,880 --> 00:28:16,160 initial increase in output that comes 810 00:28:13,839 --> 00:28:17,519 from the government expansion, that does 811 00:28:16,160 --> 00:28:19,080 lead to increase in income, but if 812 00:28:17,519 --> 00:28:20,920 consumers don't spend it, it doesn't 813 00:28:19,079 --> 00:28:22,918 recirculate into the economy, and then 814 00:28:20,920 --> 00:28:24,919 you don't get a multiplier. Okay? So, 815 00:28:22,919 --> 00:28:27,600 that's that's the reason we call it the 816 00:28:24,919 --> 00:28:27,600 multiplier. 817 00:28:27,919 --> 00:28:32,360 So, that diagram is is an important 818 00:28:29,679 --> 00:28:34,519 diagram. I'm just 819 00:28:32,359 --> 00:28:34,519 uh 820 00:28:34,559 --> 00:28:39,200 doing this, actually. In that diagram, 821 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:40,639 I'm plotting the aggregate demand 822 00:28:39,200 --> 00:28:42,679 function, 823 00:28:40,640 --> 00:28:44,960 and then this equilibrium condition, 824 00:28:42,679 --> 00:28:46,480 output equal to aggregate demand, 825 00:28:44,960 --> 00:28:47,480 in the space 826 00:28:46,480 --> 00:28:48,799 of 827 00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:51,559 uh 828 00:28:48,799 --> 00:28:53,759 aggregate demand and output, production, 829 00:28:51,559 --> 00:28:55,639 and income here. But remember, income is 830 00:28:53,759 --> 00:28:58,919 equal to production. Okay? 831 00:28:55,640 --> 00:29:01,360 So, there's your aggregate demand, 832 00:28:58,919 --> 00:29:03,520 and that's your 45 degree line because 833 00:29:01,359 --> 00:29:05,319 this output equal to So, whatever is in 834 00:29:03,519 --> 00:29:07,079 this axis is equal to that axis. That's 835 00:29:05,319 --> 00:29:09,279 the 45 degree line. 836 00:29:07,079 --> 00:29:12,240 Okay? That's your equilibrium condition. 837 00:29:09,279 --> 00:29:13,720 It says, "At equilibrium, this guy here, 838 00:29:12,240 --> 00:29:16,279 aggregate demand Z, will have to be 839 00:29:13,720 --> 00:29:17,519 equal to Y." Those are That's straight 840 00:29:16,279 --> 00:29:20,039 there. 841 00:29:17,519 --> 00:29:23,720 This is aggregate demand. 842 00:29:20,039 --> 00:29:23,720 Why is this line flatter than that? 843 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:29,000 Why is aggregate demand flatter than 844 00:29:30,839 --> 00:29:34,678 Uh because people don't spend their 845 00:29:32,159 --> 00:29:36,640 entire dollar on Exactly. Because C1 is 846 00:29:34,679 --> 00:29:38,400 less than one. 847 00:29:36,640 --> 00:29:40,360 So, the slope of the aggregate demand in 848 00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:42,440 this space is C1. 849 00:29:40,359 --> 00:29:44,079 It's the marginal propensity to consume. 850 00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:46,000 How much more they demand if they get an 851 00:29:44,079 --> 00:29:48,480 extra dollar? Well, And don't get They 852 00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:51,920 don't demand one one extra unit they 853 00:29:48,480 --> 00:29:53,920 demand C1 unit and C1 is less than one. 854 00:29:51,920 --> 00:29:56,120 Okay, that's the reason this. 855 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:58,039 So, if C1 is very small, 856 00:29:56,119 --> 00:29:59,959 this line is going to be very flat. 857 00:29:58,039 --> 00:30:01,480 If C1 is very large, very high marginal 858 00:29:59,960 --> 00:30:02,759 propensity to consume, this is going to 859 00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:03,920 be very steep, 860 00:30:02,759 --> 00:30:05,359 the red line. 861 00:30:03,920 --> 00:30:06,480 The other one doesn't change, the 45° 862 00:30:05,359 --> 00:30:09,479 line. 863 00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:11,360 Okay? And what I said is that 864 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:13,120 at equilibrium So, you see if I take an 865 00:30:11,359 --> 00:30:14,399 off-equilibrium level of output, say 866 00:30:13,119 --> 00:30:15,599 this, 867 00:30:14,400 --> 00:30:16,920 aggregate demand is different from 868 00:30:15,599 --> 00:30:19,480 output. 869 00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:22,279 It's only at equilibrium that these two 870 00:30:19,480 --> 00:30:22,279 things will hold. 871 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:27,280 Okay? 872 00:30:23,720 --> 00:30:28,680 This function I can plot it everywhere. 873 00:30:27,279 --> 00:30:30,399 But this one will hold only at 874 00:30:28,680 --> 00:30:31,320 equilibrium. 875 00:30:30,400 --> 00:30:34,640 Okay? 876 00:30:31,319 --> 00:30:34,639 That's when these two things are equal. 877 00:30:35,559 --> 00:30:41,720 So, what I solve here, 878 00:30:39,319 --> 00:30:42,960 here I just found this point. 879 00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:46,400 Okay? 880 00:30:42,960 --> 00:30:46,960 So, parameters here are C0, 881 00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:50,960 uh 882 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:53,319 C1 * T, and G. They all shifters of this 883 00:30:50,960 --> 00:30:55,200 aggregate demand up and down. 884 00:30:53,319 --> 00:30:59,279 Okay? 885 00:30:55,200 --> 00:31:01,640 And and that point here 886 00:30:59,279 --> 00:31:03,480 is exactly that. And those all those 887 00:31:01,640 --> 00:31:05,800 things are parameters in my aggregate 888 00:31:03,480 --> 00:31:05,799 demand. 889 00:31:11,240 --> 00:31:15,319 I really want you to internalize this 890 00:31:12,839 --> 00:31:15,319 diagram. 891 00:31:15,720 --> 00:31:18,480 Any questions about 892 00:31:19,640 --> 00:31:24,360 Just stare at this little bit because 893 00:31:21,559 --> 00:31:25,839 it's going to show up repeatedly. 894 00:31:24,359 --> 00:31:28,359 And and later on it's not going to show 895 00:31:25,839 --> 00:31:29,919 up, but whenever you get confused, the 896 00:31:28,359 --> 00:31:31,599 way to get yourself out of that 897 00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:32,960 confusion is going to be to go back to 898 00:31:31,599 --> 00:31:34,839 the diagram. 899 00:31:32,960 --> 00:31:37,240 You'll see. I'll remind you when when 900 00:31:34,839 --> 00:31:39,839 when that's likely to happen. 901 00:31:37,240 --> 00:31:42,839 Okay? So, so you better understand 902 00:31:39,839 --> 00:31:44,480 this diagram. Play with it. Move 903 00:31:42,839 --> 00:31:46,559 Here the only thing you can move around 904 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:48,599 is the ZZ, the the the aggregate demand 905 00:31:46,559 --> 00:31:49,960 curve. Okay? 906 00:31:48,599 --> 00:31:52,559 The other thing is our equilibrium 907 00:31:49,960 --> 00:31:55,400 condition. You can't move that that 45° 908 00:31:52,559 --> 00:31:58,079 line. But ZZ you can move it around. So, 909 00:31:55,400 --> 00:32:00,320 let's do a a few exercises. Well, one, 910 00:31:58,079 --> 00:32:05,039 the most obvious. 911 00:32:00,319 --> 00:32:06,678 Suppose that C0 increases by 1 billion. 912 00:32:05,039 --> 00:32:07,960 Okay? So, autonomous consumption, that 913 00:32:06,679 --> 00:32:09,560 is that level of consumption which is 914 00:32:07,960 --> 00:32:10,480 independent of income, goes up by 1 915 00:32:09,559 --> 00:32:12,119 billion. 916 00:32:10,480 --> 00:32:14,559 And that could be, you know, we're all 917 00:32:12,119 --> 00:32:16,199 in a better mood. You know, okay, 918 00:32:14,559 --> 00:32:18,399 disposable income is whatever it is 919 00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:20,880 today, but you know, there's great 920 00:32:18,400 --> 00:32:24,120 expectation that that in the that the 921 00:32:20,880 --> 00:32:26,040 economy will enter a boom next year. 922 00:32:24,119 --> 00:32:28,199 And so, then you feel richer and so on, 923 00:32:26,039 --> 00:32:29,440 and you may decide to consume not wait 924 00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:31,559 until next year, you may decide to 925 00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:34,400 consume more today. That kind of thought 926 00:32:31,559 --> 00:32:36,639 experiment can be captured by a C0 type 927 00:32:34,400 --> 00:32:38,679 shift, go up. And that's when you I talk 928 00:32:36,640 --> 00:32:41,120 about consumer sentiment. Well, consumer 929 00:32:38,679 --> 00:32:42,320 sentiment is about a lot about C0. For 930 00:32:41,119 --> 00:32:45,239 any given level of income, will 931 00:32:42,319 --> 00:32:47,000 consumers are likely to to to consume 932 00:32:45,240 --> 00:32:48,160 more than they would otherwise or or 933 00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:50,039 less. 934 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:52,000 And that's what C0 captures. 935 00:32:50,039 --> 00:32:53,279 So, let's go 936 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:54,599 everything in this model, there's no 937 00:32:53,279 --> 00:32:57,079 dynamics 938 00:32:54,599 --> 00:32:59,119 in this simple model, so we immediately 939 00:32:57,079 --> 00:33:00,678 but we know is if just were to solve the 940 00:32:59,119 --> 00:33:03,199 equation, 941 00:33:00,679 --> 00:33:05,120 and I tell you what happens to if output 942 00:33:03,200 --> 00:33:07,319 what happens to output if C0 goes up by 943 00:33:05,119 --> 00:33:09,159 1 billion, 944 00:33:07,319 --> 00:33:11,559 you know that output will rise by how 945 00:33:09,160 --> 00:33:11,560 much? 946 00:33:12,279 --> 00:33:15,440 Let's keep it simple. 947 00:33:14,759 --> 00:33:17,160 I 948 00:33:15,440 --> 00:33:19,160 just staring at that equation. If I tell 949 00:33:17,160 --> 00:33:20,560 you autonomous consumption goes up by 1 950 00:33:19,160 --> 00:33:22,279 billion, 951 00:33:20,559 --> 00:33:25,960 what happens to equilibrium output? Goes 952 00:33:22,279 --> 00:33:29,759 up by more or less than 1 billion? 953 00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:29,759 Or or exactly 1 billion? 954 00:33:33,519 --> 00:33:37,799 Exactly. And the multiplier is greater 955 00:33:35,359 --> 00:33:40,399 than one. So, we know that the output 956 00:33:37,799 --> 00:33:41,919 will increase by more than 1 billion. 957 00:33:40,400 --> 00:33:43,759 Will increase by 1 billion times the 958 00:33:41,920 --> 00:33:46,480 multiplier. 959 00:33:43,759 --> 00:33:49,599 If C1 is .5, then it will increase by 2 960 00:33:46,480 --> 00:33:51,880 billion dollars equilibrium output. 961 00:33:49,599 --> 00:33:54,319 Now, I'm going to get you to from the 1 962 00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:55,960 billion to the 2 billion in a steps 963 00:33:54,319 --> 00:33:58,200 using the diagram. That's what I intend 964 00:33:55,960 --> 00:34:00,240 to do next. 965 00:33:58,200 --> 00:34:02,319 Okay? So, 966 00:34:00,240 --> 00:34:04,440 this shift here, so we're starting from 967 00:34:02,319 --> 00:34:06,960 this equilibrium output here. 968 00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:08,039 This shift here, 969 00:34:06,960 --> 00:34:10,240 boom, 970 00:34:08,039 --> 00:34:14,679 is increasing C0. That's a 1 billion. 971 00:34:10,239 --> 00:34:16,119 So, distance A to B is 1 billion. That's 972 00:34:14,679 --> 00:34:17,720 it will be because what I did is for any 973 00:34:16,119 --> 00:34:20,199 given level of output I shift this 974 00:34:17,719 --> 00:34:22,000 aggregate demand up by 1 billion. That's 975 00:34:20,199 --> 00:34:23,039 autonomous consumption up. 976 00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:24,039 Okay? 977 00:34:23,039 --> 00:34:27,079 Well, 978 00:34:24,039 --> 00:34:30,279 because output is whatever demand wants, 979 00:34:27,079 --> 00:34:32,279 that immediately increases output 980 00:34:30,280 --> 00:34:35,720 by 1 billion. So, B, the distance 981 00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:36,679 between B and C is also 1 billion. 982 00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:38,480 Okay? 983 00:34:36,679 --> 00:34:41,918 Demand increase by 1 billion, boom, 984 00:34:38,480 --> 00:34:45,000 output immediately catches up. 985 00:34:41,918 --> 00:34:48,000 So, output increases by 1 billion. 986 00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:51,119 But if output increases by 1 billion, 987 00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:51,119 what has happened to income? 988 00:34:56,239 --> 00:35:01,000 It also increased by 1 billion. Income 989 00:34:58,440 --> 00:35:02,079 is the same as output. 990 00:35:01,000 --> 00:35:04,400 So, 991 00:35:02,079 --> 00:35:05,880 income has increased by 1 billion. 992 00:35:04,400 --> 00:35:09,358 Well, if income has increased by 1 993 00:35:05,880 --> 00:35:11,400 billion and C1 is different from zero, 994 00:35:09,358 --> 00:35:12,840 that means part of that extra billion is 995 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:15,358 going to be spent 996 00:35:12,840 --> 00:35:18,800 in consumption, second round. 997 00:35:15,358 --> 00:35:21,000 So, say C1 is .5, then now you get 500 998 00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:22,880 million dollars more of expenditure. 999 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:25,358 But if it's of consumption, and if 1000 00:35:22,880 --> 00:35:26,760 there's 500 dollars that's that's a C 1001 00:35:25,358 --> 00:35:29,000 CD. 1002 00:35:26,760 --> 00:35:31,720 Shift, that's 500 million. 1003 00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:33,320 Obviously, this C1 here is is less than 1004 00:35:31,719 --> 00:35:35,000 .5 because otherwise 1005 00:35:33,320 --> 00:35:37,519 you know, this would be half of that, 1006 00:35:35,000 --> 00:35:39,800 but but it's not. Anyway, 1007 00:35:37,519 --> 00:35:41,679 you get 500 million more. 1008 00:35:39,800 --> 00:35:43,640 But if you if now there's 500 million 1009 00:35:41,679 --> 00:35:45,679 more of demand, since output does 1010 00:35:43,639 --> 00:35:47,559 whatever production does whatever demand 1011 00:35:45,679 --> 00:35:49,079 wants, then you get 500 more of 1012 00:35:47,559 --> 00:35:51,119 production. 1013 00:35:49,079 --> 00:35:52,599 And if you have 500 more million dollars 1014 00:35:51,119 --> 00:35:54,199 more of production, then you have 500 1015 00:35:52,599 --> 00:35:56,039 million more of income. 1016 00:35:54,199 --> 00:35:57,960 And if you have 500 more of income and 1017 00:35:56,039 --> 00:36:00,159 so your C1 is greater than zero, 1018 00:35:57,960 --> 00:36:02,000 say .5, you're going to spend 250 1019 00:36:00,159 --> 00:36:05,358 million more. 1020 00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:06,880 But 250 million more will generate 250 1021 00:36:05,358 --> 00:36:09,079 million dollars of production, which 1022 00:36:06,880 --> 00:36:10,400 also will generate 250 million dollars 1023 00:36:09,079 --> 00:36:11,880 more 1024 00:36:10,400 --> 00:36:13,358 of 1025 00:36:11,880 --> 00:36:16,480 income, 1026 00:36:13,358 --> 00:36:17,920 which will generate 125 million more 1027 00:36:16,480 --> 00:36:20,440 of consumption, and blah blah blah blah 1028 00:36:17,920 --> 00:36:22,039 blah. You you you get your Okay? 1029 00:36:20,440 --> 00:36:24,119 So, that's and that's what is happening 1030 00:36:22,039 --> 00:36:25,800 here. 1031 00:36:24,119 --> 00:36:27,920 Boom. 1032 00:36:25,800 --> 00:36:27,920 Yeah. 1033 00:36:29,358 --> 00:36:34,840 From C 1034 00:36:30,679 --> 00:36:38,159 to D. Okay. So, this is initial 1035 00:36:34,840 --> 00:36:39,440 shift in aggregate demand up, 1 billion. 1036 00:36:38,159 --> 00:36:41,559 That 1037 00:36:39,440 --> 00:36:42,280 lead to leads to 1038 00:36:41,559 --> 00:36:45,159 uh 1039 00:36:42,280 --> 00:36:48,120 1 billion more of production as well, 1040 00:36:45,159 --> 00:36:50,679 which means 1 billion more of income. 1041 00:36:48,119 --> 00:36:53,719 Okay? But now these consumers not only 1042 00:36:50,679 --> 00:36:55,199 have this C0 1 billion higher in C0, but 1043 00:36:53,719 --> 00:36:57,279 they also have 1 1044 00:36:55,199 --> 00:36:59,159 uh billion more of income. 1045 00:36:57,280 --> 00:37:01,200 And since they have 1 billion income and 1046 00:36:59,159 --> 00:37:03,839 they're going to spend part of it, C1 1047 00:37:01,199 --> 00:37:06,319 times that, and I assume C1 was .5, 1048 00:37:03,840 --> 00:37:09,039 that's what gives me CD. 1049 00:37:06,320 --> 00:37:10,720 That's the the extra five 500 million 1050 00:37:09,039 --> 00:37:12,039 dollars. 1051 00:37:10,719 --> 00:37:13,559 And then this that thing here there is 1052 00:37:12,039 --> 00:37:18,519 also 500 million dollars, and then there 1053 00:37:13,559 --> 00:37:20,358 was 250 million, 250 million, 125, 125, 1054 00:37:18,519 --> 00:37:23,559 62 and a half, blah blah blah. 1055 00:37:20,358 --> 00:37:23,559 That's that's the way you get there. 1056 00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:28,160 There's an alternative way of 1057 00:37:26,760 --> 00:37:30,240 finding equilibrium output, which is 1058 00:37:28,159 --> 00:37:32,519 entirely equivalent. And it's the way it 1059 00:37:30,239 --> 00:37:34,759 was initially done, by the way. 1060 00:37:32,519 --> 00:37:37,239 Uh and and and you'll see later on a 1061 00:37:34,760 --> 00:37:38,400 very important curve in this course will 1062 00:37:37,239 --> 00:37:40,959 be 1063 00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:43,200 the IS curve, which is a curve that 1064 00:37:40,960 --> 00:37:45,199 describes all the equilibrium in goods 1065 00:37:43,199 --> 00:37:47,000 markets. We'll get there. 1066 00:37:45,199 --> 00:37:48,439 But but the reason it's called IS is 1067 00:37:47,000 --> 00:37:50,679 because of this alternative way of 1068 00:37:48,440 --> 00:37:52,200 deriving the same I have derived, 1069 00:37:50,679 --> 00:37:54,599 which is 1070 00:37:52,199 --> 00:37:55,919 through you you can arrive to the same 1071 00:37:54,599 --> 00:37:58,599 equilibrium by saying, "Look, 1072 00:37:55,920 --> 00:38:01,840 equilibrium output is that output at 1073 00:37:58,599 --> 00:38:03,319 which investment is equal to saving." 1074 00:38:01,840 --> 00:38:05,840 That's the reason that curve is going to 1075 00:38:03,320 --> 00:38:07,240 be called IS, investment equal to 1076 00:38:05,840 --> 00:38:08,680 saving, S. 1077 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:10,159 So, let me very quickly do it for you 1078 00:38:08,679 --> 00:38:11,679 and and then make a point and connect 1079 00:38:10,159 --> 00:38:14,559 the two things. 1080 00:38:11,679 --> 00:38:16,639 So, say private saving is, you know, 1081 00:38:14,559 --> 00:38:19,358 what con- sumers do and so on, 1082 00:38:16,639 --> 00:38:21,599 and firms, is just disposable income 1083 00:38:19,358 --> 00:38:22,599 minus consumption. That's your saving. 1084 00:38:21,599 --> 00:38:24,960 Okay? 1085 00:38:22,599 --> 00:38:27,759 So, it's equal to Y minus T, that's 1086 00:38:24,960 --> 00:38:31,079 disposable income, minus C. 1087 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:32,480 Government saving is taxes minus 1088 00:38:31,079 --> 00:38:34,400 government expenditure. So, if the 1089 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:36,400 government has a deficit, that thing is 1090 00:38:34,400 --> 00:38:38,840 negative. Governments often have 1091 00:38:36,400 --> 00:38:42,480 negative saving. Okay? If you have a 1092 00:38:38,840 --> 00:38:45,320 surplus, then taxes are greater than G, 1093 00:38:42,480 --> 00:38:47,440 then you have a fiscal surplus. Again, 1094 00:38:45,320 --> 00:38:49,880 rarely happens in the US 1095 00:38:47,440 --> 00:38:51,760 or in the Americas in general. Okay? 1096 00:38:49,880 --> 00:38:53,480 Happens a lot in Asia, but not doesn't 1097 00:38:51,760 --> 00:38:54,800 happen very much in this part of the 1098 00:38:53,480 --> 00:38:57,880 world. 1099 00:38:54,800 --> 00:39:00,200 But there we are. So, in equilibrium, 1100 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:02,559 investment, I, 1101 00:39:00,199 --> 00:39:03,799 has to be equal to saving. So, that's 1102 00:39:02,559 --> 00:39:06,639 what you are going to use the saving 1103 00:39:03,800 --> 00:39:08,280 for, to invest. Okay? 1104 00:39:06,639 --> 00:39:09,480 So, investment is equal to the sum of 1105 00:39:08,280 --> 00:39:11,880 savings. 1106 00:39:09,480 --> 00:39:14,599 I can replace all that in here, and you 1107 00:39:11,880 --> 00:39:16,599 see that I get exactly the same 1108 00:39:14,599 --> 00:39:18,960 equilibrium condition I had before. 1109 00:39:16,599 --> 00:39:21,079 Output equal to aggregate demand. 1110 00:39:18,960 --> 00:39:22,119 Okay? So, this is an entirely equivalent 1111 00:39:21,079 --> 00:39:24,239 way 1112 00:39:22,119 --> 00:39:26,400 of deriving this, and I just want to 1113 00:39:24,239 --> 00:39:28,639 show you this 1114 00:39:26,400 --> 00:39:31,119 because it's the way it was originally 1115 00:39:28,639 --> 00:39:32,759 done, and and and and and you'll 1116 00:39:31,119 --> 00:39:33,839 understand better the terminology we use 1117 00:39:32,760 --> 00:39:35,280 later on 1118 00:39:33,840 --> 00:39:38,200 if you see that this is an equivalent 1119 00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:40,400 way. This is also a nice way of 1120 00:39:38,199 --> 00:39:41,839 illustrating something why macro can be 1121 00:39:40,400 --> 00:39:43,720 counterintuitive sometimes. 1122 00:39:41,840 --> 00:39:45,840 Microeconomics is very intuitive. I 1123 00:39:43,719 --> 00:39:47,559 mean, things make sense. 1124 00:39:45,840 --> 00:39:49,880 It's like physics, it makes sense. Macro 1125 00:39:47,559 --> 00:39:52,000 is can be confusing. 1126 00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:54,200 For example, there's the well-known 1127 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:55,400 paradox of saving in the short run, not 1128 00:39:54,199 --> 00:39:57,480 in the long run. In the short run, you 1129 00:39:55,400 --> 00:40:00,280 have the paradox of saving. 1130 00:39:57,480 --> 00:40:02,079 So, you know, we all think that you save 1131 00:40:00,280 --> 00:40:03,840 more is a good thing. Our parents teach 1132 00:40:02,079 --> 00:40:05,079 us that it's a good thing to save more 1133 00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:06,320 and so on. 1134 00:40:05,079 --> 00:40:08,079 And in general, 1135 00:40:06,320 --> 00:40:10,680 that is true. You'll do better in life 1136 00:40:08,079 --> 00:40:12,519 if you save a little more and so on. 1137 00:40:10,679 --> 00:40:15,079 But it's not true for the macro in the 1138 00:40:12,519 --> 00:40:15,079 short run. 1139 00:40:16,360 --> 00:40:20,760 You know, it's not good for 1140 00:40:18,519 --> 00:40:22,759 macroeconomics in the short run 1141 00:40:20,760 --> 00:40:24,520 unless you are in a overheated economy. 1142 00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:27,080 Now, it could help. 1143 00:40:24,519 --> 00:40:30,079 But otherwise, it's not very good for 1144 00:40:27,079 --> 00:40:32,279 equilibrium output. Let me show you that 1145 00:40:30,079 --> 00:40:33,440 very quickly with the expression I just 1146 00:40:32,280 --> 00:40:35,920 showed you. Remember that I said 1147 00:40:33,440 --> 00:40:38,639 equilibrium output is pinned down by 1148 00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:40,000 investment equal to saving. And saving 1149 00:40:38,639 --> 00:40:41,599 of the private saving here is an 1150 00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:45,079 increasing is an increasing function of 1151 00:40:41,599 --> 00:40:48,799 output, okay? It is equal to actually 1 1152 00:40:45,079 --> 00:40:51,440 - c The function has a slope of 1 - c1. 1153 00:40:48,800 --> 00:40:53,960 C1 is the share of income that you spend 1154 00:40:51,440 --> 00:40:55,679 in consumption. Therefore, 1 - c1 is the 1155 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:57,880 share of your income that you spend in 1156 00:40:55,679 --> 00:41:01,279 saving, okay? So, this function is 1157 00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:03,119 increasing with a slope of 1 - c1. 1158 00:41:01,280 --> 00:41:05,240 So, suppose I tell you now that all we 1159 00:41:03,119 --> 00:41:06,799 decided to to we learn the lessons of 1160 00:41:05,239 --> 00:41:08,879 our parents and say, "Okay, we should 1161 00:41:06,800 --> 00:41:11,080 all save more." 1162 00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:12,800 So, that means for any for any given 1163 00:41:11,079 --> 00:41:15,840 level of income, now we all decide to 1164 00:41:12,800 --> 00:41:17,519 save more. That means the the S function 1165 00:41:15,840 --> 00:41:19,960 shifts up. 1166 00:41:17,519 --> 00:41:21,280 For any given level of income, 1167 00:41:19,960 --> 00:41:22,599 we save more. But 1168 00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:26,080 we have a problem there because now we 1169 00:41:22,599 --> 00:41:26,079 have more saving than investment. 1170 00:41:26,159 --> 00:41:29,759 So, how how do we restore equilibrium? 1171 00:41:28,199 --> 00:41:32,960 That's not an equilibrium. 1172 00:41:29,760 --> 00:41:32,960 How do we restore equilibrium? 1173 00:41:37,480 --> 00:41:42,519 So, now we all decide to be more prudent 1174 00:41:39,559 --> 00:41:45,239 and save a little more. 1175 00:41:42,519 --> 00:41:47,400 At the level of the economy as a whole, 1176 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:49,319 now we have more saving than investment. 1177 00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:51,400 That can happen. It can It's not an 1178 00:41:49,320 --> 00:41:54,720 equilibrium. 1179 00:41:51,400 --> 00:41:54,720 What restores equilibrium? 1180 00:41:55,039 --> 00:41:57,759 Well, 1181 00:41:55,960 --> 00:41:59,720 in this very simple model, our 1182 00:41:57,760 --> 00:42:01,120 investment is fixed. So, I nothing can 1183 00:41:59,719 --> 00:42:02,759 adjust on the investment side because 1184 00:42:01,119 --> 00:42:04,599 it's fixed. Later on, it's going to 1185 00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:06,320 move, but now it's fixed. 1186 00:42:04,599 --> 00:42:09,000 Nothing can adjust in the public saving 1187 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:10,720 part because, you know, it can't move. 1188 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:12,679 We assume that it's exogenous. 1189 00:42:10,719 --> 00:42:15,719 So, something has to happen endogenously 1190 00:42:12,679 --> 00:42:17,119 here that that reverses the increase in 1191 00:42:15,719 --> 00:42:18,719 savings. That's the only thing that can 1192 00:42:17,119 --> 00:42:20,920 happen. And the only thing that can 1193 00:42:18,719 --> 00:42:22,199 happen endogenously here is a declining 1194 00:42:20,920 --> 00:42:24,639 output. 1195 00:42:22,199 --> 00:42:26,759 Output declines, saving declines. 1196 00:42:24,639 --> 00:42:28,519 So, here you end up in a situation in 1197 00:42:26,760 --> 00:42:30,840 which we all decided to be sort of, you 1198 00:42:28,519 --> 00:42:32,280 know, better people, save a little more, 1199 00:42:30,840 --> 00:42:34,400 and we end up sinking the economy in a 1200 00:42:32,280 --> 00:42:35,120 recession. 1201 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:36,880 Yeah, 1202 00:42:35,119 --> 00:42:37,960 output declines. 1203 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:41,119 Okay, that's the reason it's called the 1204 00:42:37,960 --> 00:42:41,119 paradox of saving. 1205 00:42:41,519 --> 00:42:44,559 That's not going to happen to you 1206 00:42:42,440 --> 00:42:46,039 individually, but to an economy as a 1207 00:42:44,559 --> 00:42:47,559 whole, that's the reason I said it's 1208 00:42:46,039 --> 00:42:50,559 counterintuitive. 1209 00:42:47,559 --> 00:42:50,559 It it can happen. 1210 00:42:52,400 --> 00:42:54,639 I get 1211 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:57,240 So, I 1212 00:42:54,639 --> 00:42:57,879 Look, if you don't like this way of 1213 00:42:57,239 --> 00:42:59,039 uh 1214 00:42:57,880 --> 00:43:00,360 and it's not the main way we're going to 1215 00:42:59,039 --> 00:43:02,400 use. If you don't like this way of 1216 00:43:00,360 --> 00:43:04,039 finding equilibrium output, just ignore 1217 00:43:02,400 --> 00:43:06,119 it. I I just wanted you to know it. Go 1218 00:43:04,039 --> 00:43:08,079 back to The thing you really need to 1219 00:43:06,119 --> 00:43:10,719 understand is not this, it's it's this, 1220 00:43:08,079 --> 00:43:11,920 that, that that you need to understand. 1221 00:43:10,719 --> 00:43:14,399 So, let me 1222 00:43:11,920 --> 00:43:16,039 illustrate the paradox of saving 1223 00:43:14,400 --> 00:43:19,119 in in the model we're using, in the one 1224 00:43:16,039 --> 00:43:20,960 I want you to really remember. 1225 00:43:19,119 --> 00:43:23,480 Well, 1226 00:43:20,960 --> 00:43:25,280 the paradox of saving, I can capture by 1227 00:43:23,480 --> 00:43:27,240 a declining c0. 1228 00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:29,360 Okay? For any given level of income, now 1229 00:43:27,239 --> 00:43:31,119 we decide to consume less. If we consume 1230 00:43:29,360 --> 00:43:33,800 less for any given level of income, that 1231 00:43:31,119 --> 00:43:34,799 means we're saving more. 1232 00:43:33,800 --> 00:43:38,080 Okay? 1233 00:43:34,800 --> 00:43:39,360 So, I can capture in this diagram 1234 00:43:38,079 --> 00:43:41,559 uh 1235 00:43:39,360 --> 00:43:44,039 the the fact that we all all become sort 1236 00:43:41,559 --> 00:43:46,519 of more prudent by a declining aggregate 1237 00:43:44,039 --> 00:43:46,519 demand. 1238 00:43:46,719 --> 00:43:49,599 But if aggregate demand declines, so 1239 00:43:48,199 --> 00:43:51,039 suppose we start at this equilibrium 1240 00:43:49,599 --> 00:43:53,119 level of output and then all of a sudden 1241 00:43:51,039 --> 00:43:55,599 we say, "Okay, enough is enough. We need 1242 00:43:53,119 --> 00:43:56,719 We need to start saving more." 1243 00:43:55,599 --> 00:43:58,839 Then, 1244 00:43:56,719 --> 00:44:00,239 what happens? Well, aggregate demand 1245 00:43:58,840 --> 00:44:02,200 declines. 1246 00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:03,319 I mean, for any given level of income, 1247 00:44:02,199 --> 00:44:04,480 if you're going to save more, that means 1248 00:44:03,320 --> 00:44:06,480 you're going to consume less. So, 1249 00:44:04,480 --> 00:44:07,840 aggregate demand declines. 1250 00:44:06,480 --> 00:44:10,400 But what happens when aggregate demand 1251 00:44:07,840 --> 00:44:10,400 declines? 1252 00:44:11,039 --> 00:44:14,400 Output declines. 1253 00:44:13,159 --> 00:44:17,039 What happens when out when output 1254 00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:17,039 declines? 1255 00:44:18,079 --> 00:44:23,279 Income declines. 1256 00:44:19,800 --> 00:44:23,280 What happens when income declines? 1257 00:44:25,519 --> 00:44:28,840 Well, part of that income you consume, 1258 00:44:27,079 --> 00:44:31,599 so you're going to consume less. 1259 00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:33,320 C1 times that. So, then and then you get 1260 00:44:31,599 --> 00:44:35,358 the multiplier working against you. So, 1261 00:44:33,320 --> 00:44:38,680 not only if now we all decide to save 1262 00:44:35,358 --> 00:44:41,079 more, not only output falls 1263 00:44:38,679 --> 00:44:42,440 by the same amount that that we increase 1264 00:44:41,079 --> 00:44:44,079 savings, 1265 00:44:42,440 --> 00:44:45,639 but actually it declines by more than 1266 00:44:44,079 --> 00:44:47,719 that because you get the multiplier 1267 00:44:45,639 --> 00:44:49,599 working against against you. 1268 00:44:47,719 --> 00:44:51,839 Okay? 1269 00:44:49,599 --> 00:44:54,880 That's the reason I'm a big role of 1270 00:44:51,840 --> 00:44:57,320 policy makers really in recession is to 1271 00:44:54,880 --> 00:44:58,640 try to maintain the calm, the you know, 1272 00:44:57,320 --> 00:45:00,880 because you can get into this kind of 1273 00:44:58,639 --> 00:45:02,759 things. If everybody gets scared and and 1274 00:45:00,880 --> 00:45:04,358 you know, we all get scared, so the 1275 00:45:02,760 --> 00:45:06,480 economy can implode just out of bad 1276 00:45:04,358 --> 00:45:08,799 sentiment. Uh 1277 00:45:06,480 --> 00:45:08,800 and so on. 1278 00:45:14,159 --> 00:45:18,799 Now, we're on the opposite side of the 1279 00:45:16,320 --> 00:45:20,519 cycle. We would want output to decline a 1280 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:22,200 little because we are having other 1281 00:45:20,519 --> 00:45:24,239 problems, inflation and so on, again, 1282 00:45:22,199 --> 00:45:26,159 something we'll discuss later. 1283 00:45:24,239 --> 00:45:28,279 So, now you may want to scare consumers 1284 00:45:26,159 --> 00:45:30,480 a little. And in fact, 1285 00:45:28,280 --> 00:45:30,480 uh 1286 00:45:32,599 --> 00:45:35,599 the the governors of the Federal 1287 00:45:34,039 --> 00:45:36,920 Reserve, and the same is happening in 1288 00:45:35,599 --> 00:45:38,319 other places in the world, are doing 1289 00:45:36,920 --> 00:45:42,440 just that. I mean, when they go out 1290 00:45:38,320 --> 00:45:44,080 there, say the economy is too hot, 1291 00:45:42,440 --> 00:45:45,519 uh we're going to have to mess up this 1292 00:45:44,079 --> 00:45:47,119 economy a little. And then they're 1293 00:45:45,519 --> 00:45:49,480 telling us that. 1294 00:45:47,119 --> 00:45:50,880 And and and the first ones to listen to 1295 00:45:49,480 --> 00:45:52,358 these things are is the financial 1296 00:45:50,880 --> 00:45:54,680 markets. So, every time they come out 1297 00:45:52,358 --> 00:45:56,799 and make a speech of that kind, equity 1298 00:45:54,679 --> 00:45:59,319 markets decline. 1299 00:45:56,800 --> 00:46:00,800 Well, equity markets capture before the 1300 00:45:59,320 --> 00:46:02,640 mood that consumers will have in the 1301 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:03,920 future. They capture it early. But 1302 00:46:02,639 --> 00:46:06,199 that's the message. 1303 00:46:03,920 --> 00:46:08,200 Okay? So, they're trying to At this 1304 00:46:06,199 --> 00:46:08,759 moment, really, 1305 00:46:08,199 --> 00:46:11,039 uh 1306 00:46:08,760 --> 00:46:13,320 policy makers, at least the the central 1307 00:46:11,039 --> 00:46:15,519 banks, are trying to do just that. 1308 00:46:13,320 --> 00:46:17,880 Depress a little bit consumers. 1309 00:46:15,519 --> 00:46:19,880 So so so we can 1310 00:46:17,880 --> 00:46:22,119 cool off the economy a bit. 1311 00:46:19,880 --> 00:46:22,119 Okay? 1312 00:46:22,480 --> 00:46:26,400 Any questions? 1313 00:46:24,079 --> 00:46:28,639 Again, very important lecture because 1314 00:46:26,400 --> 00:46:30,079 we're going to build on on this and and 1315 00:46:28,639 --> 00:46:32,079 later on this is going to be always in 1316 00:46:30,079 --> 00:46:33,039 the background. 1317 00:46:32,079 --> 00:46:35,199 And 1318 00:46:33,039 --> 00:46:36,960 of this until we actually go to the 1319 00:46:35,199 --> 00:46:38,960 third part of the course, 1320 00:46:36,960 --> 00:46:40,519 the key model will be this. This will be 1321 00:46:38,960 --> 00:46:42,320 in the background. More More things will 1322 00:46:40,519 --> 00:46:45,480 be happening on top, 1323 00:46:42,320 --> 00:46:48,240 but but whenever I ask you a question, 1324 00:46:45,480 --> 00:46:50,719 for example, later on, one example, what 1325 00:46:48,239 --> 00:46:54,439 else would produce a 1326 00:46:50,719 --> 00:46:54,439 this a situation like this? 1327 00:46:54,920 --> 00:46:59,039 What else would What What could have 1328 00:46:56,760 --> 00:47:01,040 What kind of policy 1329 00:46:59,039 --> 00:47:02,440 would generate 1330 00:47:01,039 --> 00:47:04,840 that 1331 00:47:02,440 --> 00:47:06,320 that movement? Well, at this point, we 1332 00:47:04,840 --> 00:47:09,039 haven't introduced monetary policy, so 1333 00:47:06,320 --> 00:47:11,440 you cannot talk about monetary policy. 1334 00:47:09,039 --> 00:47:12,719 But we do we do have 1335 00:47:11,440 --> 00:47:15,159 other kind of policy we could talk 1336 00:47:12,719 --> 00:47:15,159 about. 1337 00:47:24,159 --> 00:47:26,679 Remember? 1338 00:47:30,559 --> 00:47:34,840 Here. 1339 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:34,840 Fiscal policy. 1340 00:47:35,199 --> 00:47:38,919 Okay? 1341 00:47:36,559 --> 00:47:40,119 Fiscal policy, G and T. Those are fiscal 1342 00:47:38,920 --> 00:47:43,000 parameters. 1343 00:47:40,119 --> 00:47:45,719 When when G goes down or T goes up, we 1344 00:47:43,000 --> 00:47:47,559 call that contractionary fiscal policy. 1345 00:47:45,719 --> 00:47:49,279 Why contractionary? Because it contracts 1346 00:47:47,559 --> 00:47:51,199 aggregate demand. 1347 00:47:49,280 --> 00:47:54,000 If If G goes down, clearly aggregate 1348 00:47:51,199 --> 00:47:55,839 demand goes down immediately. If T goes 1349 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:57,519 up, well, disposable income for any 1350 00:47:55,840 --> 00:47:59,559 given level of income goes down, and 1351 00:47:57,519 --> 00:48:02,759 therefore consumption goes down. So, so 1352 00:47:59,559 --> 00:48:04,639 we call an increase a declining G or an 1353 00:48:02,760 --> 00:48:05,960 increasing T a contractionary fiscal 1354 00:48:04,639 --> 00:48:08,480 policy. 1355 00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:10,000 The opposite, if G goes up and T goes 1356 00:48:08,480 --> 00:48:11,440 down, we call that an expansionary 1357 00:48:10,000 --> 00:48:14,199 fiscal policy. 1358 00:48:11,440 --> 00:48:16,480 So, I take you back to this diagram 1359 00:48:14,199 --> 00:48:18,358 here, 1360 00:48:16,480 --> 00:48:20,280 and I ask you the question again. 1361 00:48:18,358 --> 00:48:22,000 What kind of fiscal policy will generate 1362 00:48:20,280 --> 00:48:24,160 this type of 1363 00:48:22,000 --> 00:48:27,559 this picture? 1364 00:48:24,159 --> 00:48:27,559 Contractionary or expansionary? 1365 00:48:32,760 --> 00:48:37,280 Contractionary. Contractionary. I mean, 1366 00:48:34,760 --> 00:48:39,640 good mnemonic, the output declined. 1367 00:48:37,280 --> 00:48:41,720 You know? So, contractionary So, that is 1368 00:48:39,639 --> 00:48:43,319 a declining a reduction in G, in 1369 00:48:41,719 --> 00:48:45,599 government expenditure, 1370 00:48:43,320 --> 00:48:47,960 or an increase in taxes 1371 00:48:45,599 --> 00:48:49,920 will shift that curve down, and then the 1372 00:48:47,960 --> 00:48:52,119 multiplier will make it even more 1373 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:54,760 contractionary than the initial fiscal 1374 00:48:52,119 --> 00:48:54,759 impulse. 1375 00:48:57,639 --> 00:49:01,879 Very good. 1376 00:48:58,639 --> 00:49:01,879 I'll see you on Wednesday.