WEBVTT

00:00:00.210 --> 00:00:03.870
It does seem like there's so much
optimism stars are aligned, especially

00:00:03.870 --> 00:00:07.349
with Trump saying, you know what, the
war is ending or, you know, we're done

00:00:07.349 --> 00:00:10.379
with this.
We've had him say that about 49 times

00:00:10.679 --> 00:00:13.080
since the war started.
Some say even like five times in the

00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:17.190
last nine weeks.
Why should we care and do we care?

00:00:17.429 --> 00:00:22.259
Not really, because I think that, yes,
we care if oil prices were to really go

00:00:22.260 --> 00:00:24.990
parabolic.
But I think that the big story and

00:00:24.989 --> 00:00:28.919
that's very clear even from the opening
remarks from your team, is that this is

00:00:28.920 --> 00:00:32.579
all about A.I., Right?
That's what's really driving markets

00:00:32.820 --> 00:00:34.710
around the world.
If you look at even relative

00:00:34.710 --> 00:00:41.130
performance, it's all about A.I..
So just stepping back a bit that

00:00:41.280 --> 00:00:45.030
something similar happened last year,
which is that we were all obsessed with

00:00:45.030 --> 00:00:48.689
that it's on the news front and yet that
it did go up.

00:00:49.229 --> 00:00:53.279
But people forgot about that story
because it was superseded by the

00:00:54.329 --> 00:00:57.600
amount of CapEx which is happening as
far as air is concerned.

00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:01.410
Something similar is going on this year,
which is that, yes, oil prices have gone

00:01:01.409 --> 00:01:04.530
up.
They have settled at a much higher

00:01:04.709 --> 00:01:08.760
plateau even after the decline over the
last day or two.

00:01:09.150 --> 00:01:15.300
But the AI boom is just so much bigger
that it's swamping all other effects.

00:01:15.299 --> 00:01:18.090
So it's very hard to look as to what
happened with the tariffs, which were

00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:22.950
the negative, that
the average tariff rate in America today

00:01:23.280 --> 00:01:27.480
is much higher than what it was.
Even though people talk about Trump

00:01:27.480 --> 00:01:30.990
having walked back and stuff, which is
true, but it was two and a half percent.

00:01:30.989 --> 00:01:36.000
The average tariff rate before Trump
started the escalation on the trade war.

00:01:36.299 --> 00:01:40.530
And even after he pulled back, we
settled at about 10% or so, very

00:01:40.530 --> 00:01:44.939
significantly higher from where we were.
And yet the markets and the economy

00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:48.420
withstood all of that, mainly because of
the EIA boom.

00:01:48.659 --> 00:01:52.170
Same thing is happening this year that
oil prices are higher, but because this

00:01:52.530 --> 00:01:57.299
boom is so powerful, the companies just
keep increasing CapEx.

00:01:57.329 --> 00:02:02.789
Everyone's convinced that the world is
moving towards is the future that that's

00:02:02.790 --> 00:02:04.920
all that markets seem to care about.
Interesting.

00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:10.169
You talk about parabolic and we have
seen parabolic moves before like gold,

00:02:10.169 --> 00:02:14.189
silver and even oil to to some extent a
moment in time,

00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:18.900
but never at this scale.
The question really is how long can this

00:02:18.900 --> 00:02:20.969
last?
I mean, the momentum, the rally can't go

00:02:20.969 --> 00:02:23.069
on forever.
What are the catalysts you're looking

00:02:23.069 --> 00:02:25.709
at?
So like I framed this in like three

00:02:25.710 --> 00:02:28.260
ways, really.
One, that if you look at history, the

00:02:28.259 --> 00:02:33.719
last 300 years, every single
technological innovation has been

00:02:33.719 --> 00:02:37.919
accompanied by a financial bubble, every
single know from the railroads to the

00:02:37.919 --> 00:02:43.049
Internet, canals, whatever you look at
it, it's all been accompanied always by

00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:45.839
a financial bubble.
Because when you have a great

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:48.780
technological breakthrough, it's
fantastic for the world.

00:02:48.780 --> 00:02:52.650
That's what the world progress is on.
But it leads to a huge amount of over

00:02:52.650 --> 00:02:56.010
excitement.
Companies invest and then they

00:02:56.009 --> 00:03:00.060
overinvest.
And so that's how it goes on.

00:03:00.060 --> 00:03:04.800
But there are two lessons to this.
One, that very rarely do these

00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:08.340
companies, which are investing and are
making money on their investment because

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:11.789
they typically overinvest, it's the
consumer that ends up making money.

00:03:12.030 --> 00:03:15.810
And the second most important thing is
this and we learned this in 300 years of

00:03:15.810 --> 00:03:21.120
looking at bubbles, that the consistent
factor which pricks the bubbles is that

00:03:21.120 --> 00:03:25.680
when you have higher interest rates
until you have high interest rates or

00:03:25.680 --> 00:03:29.219
some sort of a liquidity event which
tightens

00:03:30.629 --> 00:03:35.430
money in the market place, bubbles don't
just burst under their own weight.

00:03:35.909 --> 00:03:39.090
So I think that's what that's the zone
we're currently in, that interest rates

00:03:39.090 --> 00:03:41.400
are pretty stable across much of the
world.

00:03:41.789 --> 00:03:44.729
I'm watching the ten year in the US
obsessively.

00:03:45.180 --> 00:03:51.629
It's not, you know, in a any sort of a
major breakout, it's stuck between four

00:03:51.629 --> 00:03:53.359
and four and a half percent.
Now.

00:03:53.400 --> 00:03:58.080
The tenure in the US to get to 5% or
more, that's when I think that you would

00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:01.350
begin to get people asking questions,
What's my return on investment?

00:04:01.650 --> 00:04:04.950
How much are going to make out of all
this massive CapEx I'm spending?

00:04:05.219 --> 00:04:10.639
Until then, this arms race goes on.
So, yes, this is a bubble.

00:04:10.770 --> 00:04:15.780
When I look at the like, I have four
criteria to try and map out if we have a

00:04:15.780 --> 00:04:19.870
bubble or not.
It deals with overvaluation over

00:04:19.949 --> 00:04:23.189
investment, over leverage and over
ownership.

00:04:23.189 --> 00:04:28.230
The falls that I call them
on most of these, for us, this is quite

00:04:28.230 --> 00:04:30.420
advanced.
Now you can argue that we not that

00:04:30.600 --> 00:04:35.730
leverage the balance sheet of these
companies which are in overinvesting

00:04:35.730 --> 00:04:37.890
now.
They are still doing it out of the cash

00:04:37.889 --> 00:04:39.539
flows.
The debt they're taking is still

00:04:39.540 --> 00:04:44.250
relatively small, but apart from that,
we are overvalued.

00:04:44.490 --> 00:04:50.129
On most metrics, we are overawed.
I mean, 60% of American households today

00:04:50.730 --> 00:04:54.689
have exposure to the equity market for
the highest in the world.

00:04:54.689 --> 00:04:58.139
Actually, it's the highest in the world.
And in fact, America is the only country

00:04:58.350 --> 00:05:03.070
where people.
Have more of their wealth in the stock

00:05:03.069 --> 00:05:06.670
market than it did even in the property
market, which includes their own homes,

00:05:07.000 --> 00:05:10.660
typically in China or other places.
The it's the other way around.

00:05:10.670 --> 00:05:13.900
People are five times more wealth in the
property market, in the stock market.

00:05:14.170 --> 00:05:19.000
So this is a very extended bull market.
But having said that, as I said, that as

00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:23.350
long as interest rates are low and
interest rates I see are low because

00:05:23.529 --> 00:05:26.079
there are about three and a half
percent, 4%, what do we think of the

00:05:26.079 --> 00:05:29.859
short interest rates?
But nominal GDP growth is much higher,

00:05:30.009 --> 00:05:32.050
you know, like it's running at four or
5%.

00:05:32.949 --> 00:05:37.779
Concentration risk.
You take a look at Korea and Taiwan, all

00:05:37.779 --> 00:05:40.779
the massive rally has been pretty much
down to three stocks.

00:05:40.810 --> 00:05:43.079
Exactly.
I mean, the risk has become structural.

00:05:43.089 --> 00:05:45.369
No, absolutely.
I think that this is why looking at

00:05:45.370 --> 00:05:50.769
indices has become very misleading now,
because, you know, the same few

00:05:50.769 --> 00:05:53.560
companies are driving the index.
So you spoke about the emerging market

00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:55.600
index.
In fact, the emerging market index today

00:05:56.019 --> 00:05:58.810
is even more concentrated the than the
US index.

00:05:58.810 --> 00:06:02.769
Remember, for years we have spoken about
how in the US, the S&P 500 is very

00:06:02.769 --> 00:06:07.060
concentrated, dominated by these big
tech companies, almost like never

00:06:07.060 --> 00:06:09.220
before.
In emerging markets, something very

00:06:09.220 --> 00:06:12.490
similar has happened.
So you have this massive dislocation

00:06:12.490 --> 00:06:17.410
take place that for this year, markets
like China, India, these are actually

00:06:17.410 --> 00:06:22.930
down in dollar terms or, you know, like
India still down ten or per cent in

00:06:22.930 --> 00:06:25.420
dollar terms.
And yet these Korea, Taiwan markets,

00:06:25.779 --> 00:06:30.729
these are up anywhere between 70% for
Korea, 40% for Taiwan on a one year

00:06:30.730 --> 00:06:34.120
basis, they've all doubled.
So so getting massive dispersion.

00:06:34.389 --> 00:06:40.629
So as I said, the world has now become
about a monomaniacal focus on which

00:06:40.629 --> 00:06:43.569
countries have which countries don't
have a place.

00:06:43.629 --> 00:06:47.589
India doesn't have AI in India has been
tumbling.

00:06:47.589 --> 00:06:51.009
And, you know, foreign investors,
foreign funds have been making exit.

00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:55.150
What would change that?
Would it take an air bubble baths for

00:06:55.149 --> 00:06:57.039
foreign investors to start pouring money
into India?

00:06:57.100 --> 00:06:59.620
Yes, I think so.
I think that India has been perceived

00:06:59.620 --> 00:07:04.649
that way, that it's become an anti I
play because the current phase of air we

00:07:04.649 --> 00:07:09.099
are in is all about infrastructure build
out who's got the compute, who's got the

00:07:09.100 --> 00:07:14.680
infrastructure to build all of that and
India never invested that much on that

00:07:14.680 --> 00:07:16.780
front.
I mean, India, if you look at the amount

00:07:16.779 --> 00:07:22.809
they spend on research and development
as a share of the economy, it's point 6%

00:07:22.810 --> 00:07:25.720
or so.
There is this Korea, Taiwan type people.

00:07:25.720 --> 00:07:32.230
They do, you know, four or 5%
of the GDP in in R&D.

00:07:33.939 --> 00:07:36.699
Even China, the US is closer to 3%.
Right.

00:07:36.759 --> 00:07:40.689
And those are very large economies.
So I think that that's been India's

00:07:41.889 --> 00:07:45.669
so-called fault line.
Now, of course at a later stage when it

00:07:45.670 --> 00:07:51.009
moves much more to adoption, then maybe
India has an opportunity of using AI to

00:07:51.009 --> 00:07:54.129
try and improve its productivity and its
efficiency.

00:07:54.129 --> 00:07:58.000
But currently the problem is that
countries like India are seen on the

00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:01.420
wrong side of the trade for two reasons.
One, as you mentioned, that they don't

00:08:01.420 --> 00:08:05.980
have this kind of, you know,
semiconductors or compute which the

00:08:05.980 --> 00:08:11.050
entire world is chasing just now.
And the second and this may be a bit of

00:08:11.050 --> 00:08:15.280
a myth, but at least that's the
perception, is that a lot of jobs seem

00:08:15.279 --> 00:08:20.250
to be at risk because of the disruption
that India has in the software sector,

00:08:20.259 --> 00:08:24.129
software, even the GCC sector.
So these kind of sectors, you know,

00:08:24.129 --> 00:08:27.939
there's a job risk and there were 10 to
15 million people Indians employed in

00:08:27.939 --> 00:08:30.370
this, and some of them tend to be
well-paying jobs in India.

00:08:30.639 --> 00:08:33.370
And jobs has been a structural issue in
India.

00:08:33.370 --> 00:08:37.029
So on both those fronts, India is seen
as a bit of a risk.

00:08:37.029 --> 00:08:40.569
Now, at some point in time, valuations
will get attractive.

00:08:41.288 --> 00:08:46.569
And the fact that India, you know, that
the nominal GDP is growing at 10% will

00:08:46.570 --> 00:08:51.580
offer an attractive entry point.
But for now sentiment has become yeah,

00:08:51.700 --> 00:08:55.090
that we and it's true not just of India,
it's true of some of the Southeast Asian

00:08:55.090 --> 00:08:57.610
countries as well.
Like I was having a look at Philippines

00:08:57.610 --> 00:09:00.460
the other day, you know, like no one
even talks about it.

00:09:00.759 --> 00:09:05.080
But the Philippines market today on some
metrics is trading at the lowest

00:09:05.080 --> 00:09:08.800
valuation since the East Asian financial
crisis.

00:09:08.830 --> 00:09:11.560
Would you buy it then?
But I think that, you know, like the way

00:09:11.559 --> 00:09:15.429
I'm thinking of the portfolio today is
this, if I can say so, that you think

00:09:15.429 --> 00:09:19.359
about how much air you want in your
portfolio and then what are the cheap

00:09:19.360 --> 00:09:23.169
hedges that you can have in the
portfolio, which is that these are

00:09:23.169 --> 00:09:25.779
cheap.
They will not work just now, but let's

00:09:25.779 --> 00:09:29.980
say this reverses that for some reason
interest rates go up or the bubble

00:09:29.980 --> 00:09:33.039
bursts, you know, like what are the
things that could benefit?

00:09:33.220 --> 00:09:36.519
So yeah, I think that the India
Philippines, you know, could be the kind

00:09:36.519 --> 00:09:39.639
of places.
But in general, what I find is that the

00:09:39.639 --> 00:09:43.509
best hedge to this currently is not even
gold at all, because what's happened to

00:09:43.509 --> 00:09:47.799
gold is that gold used to be a good
hedge, but because it had such a peer we

00:09:47.919 --> 00:09:51.459
rally, it's no longer become a risk free
asset.

00:09:51.490 --> 00:09:53.299
There's a risk that embedded in that
price.

00:09:53.330 --> 00:09:56.830
So yeah, gold will do okay.
But I think that the best quality stocks

00:09:56.830 --> 00:10:01.720
in the world today are the best.
I do this because quality as a factor

00:10:02.110 --> 00:10:06.399
has done quite poorly, particularly in
international markets, and the quality

00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:09.669
would be good.
Companies with an artery of more than

00:10:09.669 --> 00:10:14.379
15% some earnings growth, but they have
all done poorly because there's been

00:10:14.379 --> 00:10:18.820
such a focus on just having a I and many
of the I please.

00:10:18.820 --> 00:10:21.850
I mean, we speak about the Magnificent
Seven apart from that are in fact

00:10:21.850 --> 00:10:25.509
unprofitable.
You talk about air place they used to

00:10:25.509 --> 00:10:30.519
say is still the place to be.
And yet back in 2024, you called peak US

00:10:30.519 --> 00:10:32.799
exceptionalism.
Yeah, that's not the case.

00:10:33.009 --> 00:10:35.740
We're seeing record after record after
record.

00:10:35.740 --> 00:10:40.509
Yeah, and we'll continue to test record.
I mean, so I'd written back in, as

00:10:40.509 --> 00:10:46.090
you're seeing like in December of 2024
that US exceptionalism is peaking.

00:10:46.450 --> 00:10:49.660
And what did I mean by that?
What I meant was that America had had a

00:10:49.659 --> 00:10:53.139
50 year great run of stock market
performance.

00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:57.280
But I was talking about relative the
fact that the American stock market

00:10:57.519 --> 00:11:00.399
relative to the rest of the world was
likely to peak.

00:11:00.759 --> 00:11:03.939
And when I look back at it, that has
happened that even though the American

00:11:03.940 --> 00:11:08.170
market has continued to climb higher
since December 2024, in fact, when I

00:11:08.350 --> 00:11:12.340
wrote that piece that you're talking
about, I think since then international

00:11:12.340 --> 00:11:16.660
markets have outperformed the US.
You know, like despite all this money

00:11:16.659 --> 00:11:20.379
flooding into America and there's
massive amount of money, flooding in the

00:11:20.379 --> 00:11:22.809
dollar has, in fact in the margin
weakened,

00:11:23.830 --> 00:11:25.870
it hasn't strengthened against most
currencies.

00:11:25.870 --> 00:11:29.560
Now there are some
currencies like the rupee and the peso,

00:11:29.559 --> 00:11:33.009
etc., which have clearly weakened
against the dollar.

00:11:33.009 --> 00:11:36.460
Crumbled.
Fine, you can use the word somebody, but

00:11:36.730 --> 00:11:41.590
generally currencies have done okay.
So international markets have

00:11:41.830 --> 00:11:45.370
significantly outperformed the US since
December 2024.

00:11:45.610 --> 00:11:48.669
And that's very interesting despite the
boom happening.

00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:54.190
So now to the counterfactual that if I
boom and for some reason I think America

00:11:54.190 --> 00:11:57.100
would be very vulnerable.
So the other follow up piece that I'd

00:11:57.100 --> 00:12:02.740
written last year for my column was that
America has become now one big bet on

00:12:02.970 --> 00:12:08.410
high that that and that's why even Trump
and is able to get away with so much you

00:12:08.409 --> 00:12:11.589
know, like a lot of people here in
Singapore in other places are befuddled

00:12:11.590 --> 00:12:17.019
that how does America get away with all
these, you know, actions that it takes?

00:12:17.679 --> 00:12:22.870
And my point is, because America keeps
bailing out Trump or other policies

00:12:23.049 --> 00:12:26.859
simply because of its preexisting
strengths and because of the AI boom

00:12:26.860 --> 00:12:30.460
continuing.
That's why the other actions of America

00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:34.569
are superseded by the AI boom.
You talked earlier about how you're

00:12:34.570 --> 00:12:38.860
keeping a very close eye on ten year
yields, which you say it's not at 5%,

00:12:38.860 --> 00:12:43.810
but when you take a look at 30 year
yields at 5% and expect it possibly to

00:12:43.809 --> 00:12:47.289
go higher, isn't that sending alarm
bells?

00:12:47.470 --> 00:12:50.980
Well, I wouldn't say alarm bells, but
it's sending like an orange signal.

00:12:51.159 --> 00:12:53.230
It's telling you that this is what you
should be looking at.

00:12:53.230 --> 00:12:57.639
As I said, 300 year history of bubbles,
higher interest rates is what kills

00:12:57.639 --> 00:13:00.730
them.
So if you get higher interest rates, the

00:13:00.730 --> 00:13:05.230
entire equation changes.
But, you know, this is still broadly, if

00:13:05.230 --> 00:13:08.259
you look at it, it's been stuck in a
range for a while now.

00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:10.750
Right.
So in terms of that, but I think that

00:13:10.750 --> 00:13:15.490
the if interest rates go up, that's when
it tells you, hey, this boom is coming

00:13:15.490 --> 00:13:18.190
to an end.
Now you can see that it's already very

00:13:18.190 --> 00:13:20.500
advanced.
I don't want to be around these, you

00:13:20.500 --> 00:13:24.009
know, like it like in this bubbly phase.
But there's a lot of performance

00:13:24.009 --> 00:13:27.250
pressure that people are facing just
now, because if you look at even bubbles

00:13:27.250 --> 00:13:30.429
historically, they typically you get the
best returns.

00:13:30.429 --> 00:13:35.649
Typically at the end, even in 99 2000,
you know that a lot of people speak

00:13:35.649 --> 00:13:40.090
about how Alan Greenspan in 1996 had
said this was irrational exuberance and

00:13:40.090 --> 00:13:43.570
it took more than three years after that
for that to really manifest itself.

00:13:43.570 --> 00:13:48.129
But we know from that statement the
Nasdaq went up multiple times.

00:13:48.490 --> 00:13:53.590
But I think that a
detail which is often overlooked here is

00:13:53.590 --> 00:13:58.840
that even in October of 1999, from then
to the peak, the Nasdaq doubled.

00:13:59.379 --> 00:14:03.220
So, you know, the the the end when it
happens, the last phase of this, when

00:14:03.220 --> 00:14:08.680
there's a scramble going on, the price
action tends to be the most parabolic.

00:14:08.679 --> 00:14:12.099
And that's what we're seeing in some
markets like in Korea and these places,

00:14:12.399 --> 00:14:16.659
you know, like now all of a sudden these
chip stocks, they they going up 10% a

00:14:16.659 --> 00:14:18.639
day.
I'm talking about and we're talking

00:14:18.639 --> 00:14:22.000
about really large caps chip stocks here
like Samsung High Index.

00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:25.419
And still, you know, that's not normal
price action.

00:14:25.419 --> 00:14:28.329
That tells you that this isn't a
parabolic stage.

00:14:28.570 --> 00:14:33.879
But they said that until interest rates
come in, undercut this, it's very hot.

00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:38.860
There's no science to see that it should
stop right here because these things

00:14:38.860 --> 00:14:41.830
just tend to carry on with a momentum of
their own.

00:14:41.830 --> 00:14:46.870
There's so much retail speculation going
on, not just in the US, even in Korea.

00:14:46.870 --> 00:14:50.710
And then now you have, you know, like
pro-cyclical things going on that

00:14:50.950 --> 00:14:56.200
American individual investors are now
being allowed access to buy Korean

00:14:56.200 --> 00:14:58.960
equities as well.
So it just.

00:14:59.019 --> 00:15:03.129
Fuse this further, We're sure.
I'm just wondering again, the current

00:15:03.129 --> 00:15:07.629
geopolitical landscape, how are you
pricing that into your investment

00:15:07.629 --> 00:15:09.789
theory?
Because if you take a look at what's

00:15:09.789 --> 00:15:12.639
happened, you know, amid this Iran war,
the U.S.

00:15:12.639 --> 00:15:16.720
has had to move all its weaponry from
Asia to the Middle East.

00:15:16.720 --> 00:15:19.060
And now we're talking about a shortage
of weaponry.

00:15:19.059 --> 00:15:21.639
In fact, the U.S.
has told the E.U.

00:15:21.639 --> 00:15:25.509
that perhaps, you know, all the
transfers of weaponry may have to be

00:15:25.509 --> 00:15:29.169
delayed.
Inventories are really low.

00:15:29.629 --> 00:15:31.809
That's a huge risk for the world, isn't
it?

00:15:31.960 --> 00:15:35.920
Yeah, but, you know, like
markets are very bad at pricing these

00:15:35.919 --> 00:15:40.029
kind of risks.
And that's because of the fact that, in

00:15:40.029 --> 00:15:44.110
all fairness, because 99% of the time
these risks never materialize.

00:15:44.259 --> 00:15:49.509
There are always geopolitical risks out
there in the 1% probability that they

00:15:49.509 --> 00:15:54.370
materialized, like, you know, like the
First World War or something as grave as

00:15:54.370 --> 00:15:57.310
that.
The markets are blindsided by that.

00:15:57.460 --> 00:16:01.990
So that's the problem that, as I said,
more than 90% of the time you have

00:16:01.990 --> 00:16:04.930
geopolitical risks and they don't quite
materialize.

00:16:04.929 --> 00:16:09.309
And you know, like there's a line with I
always repeat that history is better

00:16:09.309 --> 00:16:13.419
remembered than it's lived, that we now
look back and think that this is a very

00:16:13.419 --> 00:16:16.569
geopolitically fraught time.
But at any point in time,

00:16:18.129 --> 00:16:22.090
geopolitics always seems that way
because there's always some risk there,

00:16:22.090 --> 00:16:25.450
even in the best of times.
Know the people.

00:16:25.450 --> 00:16:29.650
Year before, I think we were born in the
1960s speak about, you know, like the

00:16:29.649 --> 00:16:35.709
fact that there were all sorts of fears
that us and Russia, the Soviet Union at

00:16:35.710 --> 00:16:37.120
that point in time would have a nuclear
war.

00:16:37.120 --> 00:16:41.320
And you had all these exercises of
people hiding under desks and stuff in

00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:44.019
like America.
Similarly, in the best of times of the

00:16:44.019 --> 00:16:48.639
early 1990s, the peace dividend coming
through, there was a real fear and

00:16:48.639 --> 00:16:52.960
Margaret Thatcher and all would speak
about that, that the Soviet Union as a

00:16:52.960 --> 00:16:58.900
last gasp to stay in in power and to
stay united would launch a nuclear

00:16:58.899 --> 00:17:02.610
attack you know like to try and assert
its authority.

00:17:02.620 --> 00:17:06.068
So and that was remember now we look
back at the 1990, there's a golden

00:17:06.068 --> 00:17:08.519
period about, you know, geopolitical
stability.

00:17:08.529 --> 00:17:11.848
So my point is that geopolitics is
always volatile.

00:17:11.858 --> 00:17:14.108
Yes, it seems it's a bit more volatile
now.

00:17:14.410 --> 00:17:17.859
Could be the last 20 to 30 years, but
the markets are very clear, which is

00:17:18.549 --> 00:17:21.068
that you do like the fear, geopolitical
risk.

00:17:21.400 --> 00:17:25.210
And in the 1% chance that something
really disastrous happens, they're

00:17:25.210 --> 00:17:29.319
always, you know, shocked by it.
How do you think this will play out for

00:17:29.319 --> 00:17:31.689
the midterms?
I mean, Cam Griffin did say that, you

00:17:31.690 --> 00:17:33.039
know what, the Democrats are going to
win.

00:17:33.309 --> 00:17:36.799
Yeah, well, if you look, you know,
here's the problem with the strike,

00:17:36.819 --> 00:17:40.419
which is that, yes, I think that there's
an overwhelming consensus that the House

00:17:40.660 --> 00:17:43.779
will flip on that.
You know, you know, like I think that

00:17:43.779 --> 00:17:47.589
everyone has sort of decided the Senate
is still 5050.

00:17:47.589 --> 00:17:51.399
And here's the problem in the in the
polling numbers that everyone looks at

00:17:51.400 --> 00:17:53.440
Trump's polling numbers and they are
relatively low.

00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:57.880
But the two
points I'll make here, one that every

00:17:57.880 --> 00:18:02.110
American presidents polling numbers for
the last 50, 60 years have been

00:18:02.109 --> 00:18:05.109
declining.
So comparing it to history has become

00:18:05.109 --> 00:18:08.529
fraught because in a more polarized
world, all numbers are declining.

00:18:08.859 --> 00:18:13.359
And the second point I'll make here is
that the if you look at the generic

00:18:13.539 --> 00:18:18.879
ballot, the Democrats and their polling
numbers are, in fact, lower than

00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:21.520
Trump's.
So be it.

00:18:21.519 --> 00:18:26.139
It's about who you're fighting out.
So that's another reason why Trump is

00:18:26.140 --> 00:18:30.580
able to get away, because a lot of
people in America are also very

00:18:30.579 --> 00:18:34.059
disillusioned with what the Democrat
Party is doing.
