WEBVTT

00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:04.400
Shadow Defense Minister James Patterson

00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:06.480
said today the government should be much

00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:08.800
more blunt about the military threats

00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:10.960
facing Australia and that if we really

00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:12.480
knew how serious those threats were, we

00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:15.040
would be demonstrating in the streets

00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:16.640
for more spending on our defense. Orca

00:00:15.039 --> 00:00:18.960
submarines are part of that debate

00:00:16.640 --> 00:00:21.039
following reports from the UK of delays,

00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:22.640
potential delays in production. James

00:00:21.039 --> 00:00:23.600
Patterson joins me now. James Patterson,

00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:24.560
welcome.

00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:26.080
>> Thank you for having me.

00:00:24.559 --> 00:00:28.719
>> First of all, is One Nation going to run

00:00:26.079 --> 00:00:30.159
over the Liberal candidate in Farah? The

00:00:28.719 --> 00:00:31.759
farab election is going to be very

00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:33.600
challenging for the liberal and national

00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:35.359
parties. We know we are not at an

00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:37.120
electoral high point nationally and we

00:00:35.359 --> 00:00:38.799
know that One Nation's appeal at the

00:00:37.119 --> 00:00:40.959
moment appears to be especially

00:00:38.799 --> 00:00:43.039
concentrated in regional and rural

00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:44.480
electorates. But we have an outstanding

00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:46.640
Liberal candidate, an outstanding

00:00:44.479 --> 00:00:48.159
national candidate. And if people do

00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:49.920
want to see change in this country, the

00:00:48.159 --> 00:00:51.439
best way to do that is to vote for a

00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:53.198
Liberal or national who can actually

00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:55.280
change the government, not a party of

00:00:53.198 --> 00:00:57.119
protest that can't deliver anything for

00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:59.120
an electorate like Farah or indeed the

00:00:57.119 --> 00:01:01.358
country. Let's talk James Patterson

00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:02.878
about your speech that you gave today.

00:01:01.359 --> 00:01:06.000
It's essentially, as I said before,

00:01:02.878 --> 00:01:07.759
about truthtelling in defense. As I

00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:09.438
referenced there, you say if the if the

00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:12.000
Australian public knew how likely

00:01:09.438 --> 00:01:13.759
conflict is in our region and how

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:15.840
illprepared we were for it, they would

00:01:13.760 --> 00:01:18.159
be marching demanding higher defense

00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:20.400
spending. So, first of all, how likely

00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:22.240
is it this conflict?

00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:24.320
I also said it was important not to be

00:01:22.239 --> 00:01:25.759
inflammatory or irresponsible and so I

00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:27.279
don't want to do anything which alarms

00:01:25.759 --> 00:01:28.799
Australians and I particularly don't

00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:30.640
want to do anything that singles out any

00:01:28.799 --> 00:01:32.159
diaspora communities or fakes makes them

00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:34.478
feel uncomfortable. So I want to be

00:01:32.159 --> 00:01:35.759
measured but also direct. There's not a

00:01:34.478 --> 00:01:37.679
percentage that I can put on the

00:01:35.759 --> 00:01:39.439
likelihood of conflict except that it is

00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:42.000
higher than probably most Australians

00:01:39.438 --> 00:01:44.078
think. Uh we have the context here. The

00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:46.879
People's Republic of China is engaged in

00:01:44.078 --> 00:01:49.519
the largest peacetime buildup of

00:01:46.879 --> 00:01:51.199
military capability since World War II.

00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:54.158
And accompanied with that buildup of

00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:56.960
capability is menacing military drills

00:01:54.159 --> 00:01:58.799
around Taiwan and rhetoric from Xi

00:01:56.959 --> 00:02:01.919
Jinping and other Communist Party

00:01:58.799 --> 00:02:03.600
leaders which say reunification with

00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:06.240
Taiwan is a core objective of the

00:02:03.599 --> 00:02:08.239
Communist Party and they are willing to

00:02:06.239 --> 00:02:09.598
use force if necessary. Now, I don't

00:02:08.239 --> 00:02:11.599
believe that Xiinping has made a

00:02:09.598 --> 00:02:13.519
decision to use force, but it is our

00:02:11.598 --> 00:02:15.199
national interest to discourage and

00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:16.480
deter him from doing that along with

00:02:15.199 --> 00:02:18.878
like-minded partners.

00:02:16.479 --> 00:02:21.359
>> If cander is what you're looking for,

00:02:18.878 --> 00:02:23.199
then shouldn't you tell us given those

00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:25.120
circumstances, the context that you

00:02:23.199 --> 00:02:27.519
describe, exactly what the coalition

00:02:25.120 --> 00:02:30.239
would spend to defend Australia

00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:32.400
particularly and on what capabilities?

00:02:30.239 --> 00:02:34.400
Mhm. [snorts] I should provide as much

00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:36.560
information as I can responsibly from

00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:38.400
opposition, but I also shouldn't be

00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:40.719
cavalier about making commitments

00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:42.400
without expert advice. So, what I've

00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:44.318
said is that the best informed

00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:46.159
Australians like Sarangis Houston and

00:02:44.318 --> 00:02:47.919
Professor Peter Dean, two of the

00:02:46.159 --> 00:02:49.840
reviewers for the Albanesei government's

00:02:47.919 --> 00:02:52.159
defense strategic review, have both

00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:54.959
since said we need to be spending 3% of

00:02:52.159 --> 00:02:57.199
GDP on defense. And the coalition is

00:02:54.959 --> 00:02:58.239
committed to achieving that. The Albani

00:02:57.199 --> 00:03:00.399
government has now shifted the

00:02:58.239 --> 00:03:01.920
goalposts. They're now using a different

00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:03.519
measure which includes things like

00:03:01.919 --> 00:03:06.079
military pensions which we never used

00:03:03.519 --> 00:03:08.400
before. But that accounting trick isn't

00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:10.159
a real increase in investment in defense

00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:13.200
capability which is what we need. So we

00:03:10.158 --> 00:03:14.719
say we need 3% of GDP in real terms not

00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:16.878
in pretend accounting.

00:03:14.719 --> 00:03:21.280
>> There's been a shift in the terms used

00:03:16.878 --> 00:03:23.280
by the US military about China. Um well

00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:25.919
maybe it's a a shift rather in the

00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:28.400
analysis over over over recent years.

00:03:25.919 --> 00:03:31.199
This is this is how the uh commander of

00:03:28.400 --> 00:03:33.680
US Indo Indo the IndoPacific Command put

00:03:31.199 --> 00:03:36.719
it recently to the US Senate. China has

00:03:33.680 --> 00:03:38.879
ambitions toward a global military that

00:03:36.719 --> 00:03:42.318
will project power beyond its near

00:03:38.878 --> 00:03:44.878
geography to set the rules for every

00:03:42.318 --> 00:03:46.399
relationship across the globe. Is that

00:03:44.878 --> 00:03:48.399
what you see?

00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:51.039
>> I think it's very hard to disagree with

00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:53.039
that analysis. Obviously, the Chinese

00:03:51.039 --> 00:03:55.359
government's primary national security

00:03:53.039 --> 00:03:58.000
interest is its own homeland, and it's

00:03:55.360 --> 00:03:59.599
near abroad, including Taiwan. But it

00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:01.598
also clearly is building a military

00:03:59.598 --> 00:04:03.518
which is capable of projecting power far

00:04:01.598 --> 00:04:06.000
beyond that. By tonnage and the number

00:04:03.519 --> 00:04:08.319
of ships, it now has the largest navy in

00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:10.318
the world. And I think history tells us

00:04:08.318 --> 00:04:12.079
that it's very rare for great powers to

00:04:10.318 --> 00:04:14.399
acquire such significant military

00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:16.639
capability and then never use it. Now, I

00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:18.160
hope that they don't use it. And we can

00:04:16.639 --> 00:04:20.000
help make sure that happens by working

00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:21.600
with other like-minded partners, Japan,

00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:23.360
the United States, the Philippines, and

00:04:21.600 --> 00:04:25.520
others who have a shared interest in the

00:04:23.360 --> 00:04:27.520
stability and peace of the Indopacific.

00:04:25.519 --> 00:04:29.439
But we need to be doing more than we are

00:04:27.519 --> 00:04:33.039
now if that is what we want.

00:04:29.439 --> 00:04:35.680
>> How much is current US behavior

00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:37.680
impacting public support for the

00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.840
alliance right now?

00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:41.918
I think it's inarguable that an

00:04:39.839 --> 00:04:44.079
unconventionable US administration in

00:04:41.918 --> 00:04:46.399
the second Trump administration has

00:04:44.079 --> 00:04:48.000
reduced Australian public support uh for

00:04:46.399 --> 00:04:49.758
the alliance as expressed in opinion

00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:51.279
polls and that's consistent across the

00:04:49.759 --> 00:04:53.120
western world. It's particularly evident

00:04:51.279 --> 00:04:54.879
in Europe. I don't think that actually

00:04:53.120 --> 00:04:56.079
changes the fundamentals of the US

00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:58.560
Australia alliance. It's still

00:04:56.079 --> 00:05:00.560
incredibly robust at other levels. But I

00:04:58.560 --> 00:05:02.319
think we should be adult and be honest

00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:03.839
and acknowledge that that has had an

00:05:02.319 --> 00:05:05.680
impact on how Australians view the

00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:07.439
United States. and I hear them and

00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:08.959
understand why they have that concern.

00:05:07.439 --> 00:05:10.560
It doesn't mean though that Australia's

00:05:08.959 --> 00:05:11.918
national interest has changed even if

00:05:10.560 --> 00:05:12.720
Australians disapprove of this

00:05:11.918 --> 00:05:14.478
administration.

00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:16.400
>> I understand that. But is it realistic

00:05:14.478 --> 00:05:18.159
at the same time to tell Australians

00:05:16.399 --> 00:05:20.000
that the alliance is essentially

00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:22.240
unchanged when what you're saying is

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.478
there is less trust in its

00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:25.918
commanderin-chief?

00:05:24.478 --> 00:05:27.758
>> Well, I think the alliance is about more

00:05:25.918 --> 00:05:30.959
than just the personalities of any one

00:05:27.759 --> 00:05:32.000
commander-in-chief. But it's also

00:05:30.959 --> 00:05:33.519
about that.

00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:34.959
>> Yes. And I acknowledge that and I'm not

00:05:33.519 --> 00:05:36.000
trying to argue with you on that Sarah.

00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:38.319
Of course, that's a relevant

00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:40.879
consideration. But the US system is a

00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:42.159
deep system. It includes its defense

00:05:40.879 --> 00:05:43.680
establishment, its intelligence

00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:46.080
establishment, its Congress. It's a

00:05:43.680 --> 00:05:47.600
co-equal branch of government. And in

00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:49.038
each of those branches of the

00:05:47.600 --> 00:05:51.280
government, support for the Australia

00:05:49.038 --> 00:05:52.639
alliance is fundamental because frankly

00:05:51.279 --> 00:05:54.638
it's in America's national interest.

00:05:52.639 --> 00:05:56.879
What Australia offers the United States,

00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:59.120
it cannot get from elsewhere. things

00:05:56.879 --> 00:06:00.959
like HMA Sterling which is the submarine

00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:02.560
rotational base that will be established

00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:04.879
in the next couple of years for US

00:06:02.560 --> 00:06:06.319
nuclear submarines to visit. Things like

00:06:04.879 --> 00:06:08.000
Pine Gap and other intelligence

00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:09.919
facilities which are a critical part of

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:11.279
the Five Eyes Alliance. Those are things

00:06:09.918 --> 00:06:13.120
which the United States gets from

00:06:11.279 --> 00:06:15.279
Australia which it can't get elsewhere.

00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:17.120
And in turn there are things that we get

00:06:15.279 --> 00:06:19.279
and continue to seek from the United

00:06:17.120 --> 00:06:20.800
States which we can't get from elsewhere

00:06:19.279 --> 00:06:23.279
including the Orcus partnership.

00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:26.000
>> Let let's talk about um HMA Sterling the

00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:28.318
military base in WA. The same Admiral

00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:30.879
Paparro said about it recently. In fact,

00:06:28.319 --> 00:06:32.960
in the same testimony, he said, uh, it's

00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:35.519
on track for the US forces that will

00:06:32.959 --> 00:06:37.439
arrive there in WA next year. He said,

00:06:35.519 --> 00:06:39.839
"We could be ready to operate a

00:06:37.439 --> 00:06:42.319
rotational submarine squadron out of

00:06:39.839 --> 00:06:43.439
Australia tomorrow." Do you endorse that

00:06:42.319 --> 00:06:44.960
assessment?

00:06:43.439 --> 00:06:47.120
>> Well, it's certainly a very welcome

00:06:44.959 --> 00:06:49.198
assessment, and I can't do anything

00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:50.879
except take him on his word except note

00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:52.720
that that is not the consensus of

00:06:50.879 --> 00:06:54.560
opinion amongst defense and strategic

00:06:52.720 --> 00:06:56.720
experts in Australia. There are many who

00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:58.720
are concerned that we are not on track

00:06:56.720 --> 00:07:01.199
to meet the milestones because it is a

00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:02.880
very ambitious infrastructure build in

00:07:01.199 --> 00:07:04.720
order to have its full capabilities

00:07:02.879 --> 00:07:06.800
available. So, it's possible that a US

00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:08.400
submarine could visit now, but to get

00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:10.079
all of the sustainment and maintenance

00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:11.758
that we hope ultimately to provide to

00:07:10.079 --> 00:07:12.159
the US Navy, I think will take some more

00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:14.400
time.

00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:16.400
>> Why would Admiral Paparo say that it's,

00:07:14.399 --> 00:07:17.679
you know, in good enough state to send a

00:07:16.399 --> 00:07:19.679
quad a squadron there, but he

00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:21.759
anticipates it will be ready next year.

00:07:19.680 --> 00:07:23.598
It's incredibly important to him. Why

00:07:21.759 --> 00:07:25.680
would he say that if it's as behind as

00:07:23.598 --> 00:07:27.839
you suggest it is? And Angus Taylor also

00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:29.598
who today said the base is all talk and

00:07:27.839 --> 00:07:32.399
not enough investment.

00:07:29.598 --> 00:07:34.399
>> Well, Indopaccom is very bullish on uh

00:07:32.399 --> 00:07:35.679
Orcus and very bullish on the alliance

00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:37.598
with Australia. They are some of our

00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:39.680
best friends and strongest advocates in

00:07:37.598 --> 00:07:41.598
the US system and I'm glad they are

00:07:39.680 --> 00:07:43.120
positive and leaning in and want to do

00:07:41.598 --> 00:07:44.800
more with the United States and I would

00:07:43.120 --> 00:07:46.319
never discourage them for doing so. I

00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:47.919
think it's in our national interest. But

00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:49.840
I think as Australians we can also admit

00:07:47.918 --> 00:07:52.318
that we've got hurdles to meet. We've

00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:55.198
got work to do and I don't get the sense

00:07:52.319 --> 00:07:57.759
of urgency nor do I see the sufficient

00:07:55.199 --> 00:07:59.199
investment on at a sufficient pace in

00:07:57.759 --> 00:08:00.639
order to meet all those hurdles.

00:07:59.199 --> 00:08:02.800
>> I want to talk about the reporting

00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:05.360
that's come out of the uh UK

00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:07.598
parliamentary inquiry into their

00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:10.400
involvement in August. The language they

00:08:07.598 --> 00:08:13.439
used is deeply concerning uh about

00:08:10.399 --> 00:08:16.638
delays in the investment pipeline. Now

00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:19.038
you're talking about uh planning for

00:08:16.639 --> 00:08:21.120
contingencies now. Is that because you

00:08:19.038 --> 00:08:22.639
think that we are not going to meet

00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:25.439
those milestones and we need to make

00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:29.598
decisions now for acquisitions that will

00:08:25.439 --> 00:08:31.120
fill gaps created by Orcus next decade?

00:08:29.598 --> 00:08:32.879
>> What we've heard from the UK Parliament

00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:34.479
is sobering, but it's consistent from

00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:36.240
what we've heard from congressional

00:08:34.479 --> 00:08:38.320
analysts in the United States as well,

00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:40.320
which is that Orcus is achievable, but

00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:42.320
not on status quo policies, not without

00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:45.040
increased investment and focus and

00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:46.640
momentum. And so I want to both double

00:08:45.039 --> 00:08:48.319
down on August to make sure it is

00:08:46.639 --> 00:08:50.159
delivered hopefully on time and on

00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:52.080
schedule, but also prepare for

00:08:50.159 --> 00:08:54.000
contingencies for any possible

00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:55.360
capability gaps that might emerge. You

00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:57.120
know, right now as a country, we are

00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:58.720
trying to engage in a life of type

00:08:57.120 --> 00:09:00.720
extension for our Collins class

00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:03.040
submarines, which in simple terms

00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:04.639
involves cutting it open, upgrading the

00:09:03.039 --> 00:09:07.120
components, and putting it back together

00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:08.799
again. And that's a high-risk activity

00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:10.720
which could involve slippage. And I

00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:13.120
don't want any capability gaps to open

00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:16.320
up particularly in the late 2020s or

00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:18.320
early 2030s at exactly the moment of the

00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:20.240
greatest peril according to most defense

00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:22.720
analysts. So I do think we have to start

00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:24.799
thinking about possible contingencies of

00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:26.399
complimentary capabilities that can help

00:09:24.799 --> 00:09:26.799
fill any of those gaps should they

00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:28.080
emerge.

00:09:26.799 --> 00:09:29.679
>> And what would that what would that

00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:31.040
capability look like? You're talking

00:09:29.679 --> 00:09:32.639
about stealth bombers.

00:09:31.039 --> 00:09:33.919
>> Yeah. What one idea I put on the table

00:09:32.639 --> 00:09:35.679
today which I've encouraged the

00:09:33.919 --> 00:09:38.479
government to have a second look at is

00:09:35.679 --> 00:09:40.479
the B-21 uh stealth bomber. It is a

00:09:38.480 --> 00:09:42.080
longrange stealth strike capability

00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:44.720
which is one of the functions that a

00:09:42.080 --> 00:09:46.399
nuclearpropelled submarine would perform

00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:48.959
and it has the advantage of hopefully

00:09:46.399 --> 00:09:50.879
deterring any economic coercion or

00:09:48.958 --> 00:09:53.359
military coercion on Australia's supply

00:09:50.879 --> 00:09:55.439
chains particularly at the strategic

00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:57.519
choke points the maritime choke points

00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:59.519
to our north and northwest. Uh that's

00:09:57.519 --> 00:10:01.278
the kind of capability that could be an

00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:03.360
addition to a nuclear submarine

00:10:01.278 --> 00:10:04.240
capability but also supplement it before

00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:05.440
it arrives.

00:10:04.240 --> 00:10:07.759
>> James Patterson, thank you very much

00:10:05.440 --> 00:10:10.920
indeed for joining us. Thanks Sarah.

00:10:07.759 --> 00:10:10.919
>> Thank you.