WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.490
In the history of space, one rocket

00:00:02.490 --> 00:00:04.500
stands out as an icon not only at the

00:00:04.500 --> 00:00:07.410
space race but also as the mighty power

00:00:07.410 --> 00:00:10.800
is symbolized, that one rocket which is

00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:12.450
still the tallest, heaviest and most

00:00:12.449 --> 00:00:15.029
powerful ever built was the Saturn V

00:00:15.029 --> 00:00:17.759
and was designed to take men to the moon

00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:20.429
and later launched to the first American

00:00:20.429 --> 00:00:23.309
space station Skylab but if things have

00:00:23.309 --> 00:00:24.599
been a little bit different back in the

00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:26.939
1960s we might have had a different

00:00:26.939 --> 00:00:29.039
rocket to hang on the bedroom walls of

00:00:29.039 --> 00:00:32.429
the space fans of the 70s and 80s. In the

00:00:32.429 --> 00:00:35.100
early 1960s a rocket was designed that

00:00:35.100 --> 00:00:37.920
made the Saturn V looks small by

00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:40.710
comparison. This was called the sea

00:00:40.710 --> 00:00:43.289
dragon a super heavy lift rocket that

00:00:43.289 --> 00:00:45.689
would have been ten times more powerful

00:00:45.689 --> 00:00:47.729
with 80 million pounds of thrust

00:00:47.729 --> 00:00:51.328
compared to the Saturns 7.8 million and

00:00:51.329 --> 00:00:56.250
that was from just one massive engine. It

00:00:56.250 --> 00:00:58.198
was designed to lift a payload of 1,100,000 lbs

00:00:58.198 --> 00:01:01.259
into

00:01:01.259 --> 00:01:03.238
orbit compared to the

00:01:03.238 --> 00:01:05.969
310,000 lbs  of a Saturn V.  This

00:01:05.969 --> 00:01:07.679
meant but it could have lifted an entire

00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:11.130
space station into low-earth orbit in

00:01:11.129 --> 00:01:14.429
one mission. The rocket bell of this

00:01:14.430 --> 00:01:17.939
single engine would be so large at 75

00:01:17.938 --> 00:01:20.219
feet in diameter that you could fit the

00:01:20.219 --> 00:01:22.950
entire first stage of a Saturn V with

00:01:22.950 --> 00:01:25.829
all five of it's F-1 engines inside with

00:01:25.829 --> 00:01:28.109
room to spare. So what happened to the

00:01:28.109 --> 00:01:31.618
Sea Dragon a why didn't it get built. At

00:01:31.618 --> 00:01:34.290
the time of a design in 1962 it was

00:01:34.290 --> 00:01:36.900
thought by the 1970s, 80s and beyond

00:01:36.900 --> 00:01:39.299
thousands of people would be working in

00:01:39.299 --> 00:01:42.270
space and on the moon even on Mars and

00:01:42.269 --> 00:01:44.728
as such rockets with huge lifting

00:01:44.728 --> 00:01:46.679
capabilities would have been in great

00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:48.000
demand because they would have

00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:50.219
dramatically lower the cost of getting

00:01:50.219 --> 00:01:53.399
materials into space. The Sea Dragon was

00:01:53.399 --> 00:01:56.218
designed by Robert Truax,  a US Navy

00:01:56.218 --> 00:01:58.919
Captain and rocket engineer. He was one

00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:01.079
of the pioneers of American rocketry and

00:02:01.078 --> 00:02:03.419
worked on the Thor and Polaris missiles

00:02:03.420 --> 00:02:04.750
amongst others.

00:02:04.750 --> 00:02:07.000
His team debriefed the German rocket

00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:08.618
engineers at the end of World War II

00:02:08.618 --> 00:02:11.650
including Verner von Braun who went on

00:02:11.650 --> 00:02:14.800
to design the Saturn V.  Truax believed

00:02:14.800 --> 00:02:17.290
that it was complexity that drove up the

00:02:17.289 --> 00:02:20.199
cost of rockets and not their size. His

00:02:20.199 --> 00:02:22.780
designs for the Sea Dragon made it very

00:02:22.780 --> 00:02:26.469
simple yet very large. The Sea Dragon

00:02:26.469 --> 00:02:29.709
would have been 75 feet in diameter and

00:02:29.709 --> 00:02:33.039
500 feet tall, half the height of the

00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:36.310
Chrysler Building. This type of low-cost

00:02:36.310 --> 00:02:39.129
super heavy rocket is now known as a big

00:02:39.129 --> 00:02:41.650
dumb booster due to its simplistic

00:02:41.650 --> 00:02:43.930
design. Instead of having very

00:02:43.930 --> 00:02:46.330
complicated turbo pump driven engines

00:02:46.330 --> 00:02:48.910
like the Saturn's, his were the simplest

00:02:48.909 --> 00:02:51.849
possible design for a rocket engine. In

00:02:51.849 --> 00:02:54.340
place of having powerful fuel pumps to

00:02:54.340 --> 00:02:56.560
push huge amounts of rocket fuel and

00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:58.840
oxidizer into the engine, he proposed a

00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:01.270
pressure fed system with a separate

00:03:01.270 --> 00:03:03.850
liquid nitrogen tank to pressurize the

00:03:03.849 --> 00:03:06.400
fuel tanks. This would push the fuel into

00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:09.069
the massive combustion chamber. His

00:03:09.069 --> 00:03:11.289
engines were literally not much more

00:03:11.289 --> 00:03:13.060
than the valve to turn on the fuel and

00:03:13.060 --> 00:03:15.819
the huge engine bell. This would make

00:03:15.819 --> 00:03:17.319
them not only much cheaper to

00:03:17.319 --> 00:03:19.840
manufacture but more reliable and much

00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:22.599
easier to refurbish and reuse unlike the

00:03:22.599 --> 00:03:25.090
f-1 engines of a Saturn which were left

00:03:25.090 --> 00:03:27.459
to crash into the sea and be discarded.

00:03:27.459 --> 00:03:30.099
The rocket would be of a two-stage

00:03:30.099 --> 00:03:32.650
design the first stage would lift it to

00:03:32.650 --> 00:03:34.930
a height of 130,000 feet before it

00:03:34.930 --> 00:03:37.180
separated and then fell back into the

00:03:37.180 --> 00:03:40.599
sea using drag bags to slow its impact

00:03:40.599 --> 00:03:42.609
with the water, where it would then be

00:03:42.610 --> 00:03:46.480
recovered for reuse. Although the design

00:03:46.479 --> 00:03:48.399
was much less efficient than a Saturn,

00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:51.159
the overall increase in size made up

00:03:51.159 --> 00:03:53.259
that shortfall so in theory it would be

00:03:53.259 --> 00:03:55.120
much cheaper per pound of payload

00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:57.430
compared to smaller rocket systems even

00:03:57.430 --> 00:04:00.790
ones the size of a Saturn. However there

00:04:00.789 --> 00:04:02.709
are problems in making such a huge

00:04:02.709 --> 00:04:05.469
rocket firstly just transporting the parts

00:04:05.469 --> 00:04:07.389
let alone the fully assembled version.

00:04:07.389 --> 00:04:10.389
This together with the 80 million pounds

00:04:10.389 --> 00:04:13.129
of thrust meant but it could not be launched from land.

00:04:13.129 --> 00:04:15.740
This amount of thrust would have

00:04:15.740 --> 00:04:19.069
destroyed any existing launch pad. It's

00:04:19.069 --> 00:04:20.779
estimated that the noise level at

00:04:20.779 --> 00:04:23.569
takeoff would have been around 165

00:04:23.569 --> 00:04:27.199
decibels, five miles away or the

00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:29.629
equivalent of standing next to a 5,000

00:04:29.629 --> 00:04:32.120
horsepower top fuel dragster at full

00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:34.579
throttle. Then there was the exhaust

00:04:34.579 --> 00:04:36.889
plume this would have been up to one

00:04:36.889 --> 00:04:40.039
mile long. For these reasons the Sea

00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:42.470
Dragon would have been launched at sea, hence the name.

00:04:42.470 --> 00:04:44.720
Not from a floating platform

00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:48.200
but from beneath the water. Now this is

00:04:48.199 --> 00:04:50.300
not as mad as it seems and there have

00:04:50.300 --> 00:04:52.220
been examples of sea launch rockets

00:04:52.220 --> 00:04:56.510
before and after. In 2002 a low-cost sea

00:04:56.509 --> 00:04:58.339
launch rocket delivery system called the

00:04:58.339 --> 00:05:00.619
Aquarius with a very similar design to

00:05:00.620 --> 00:05:02.959
the Sea Dragon but much smaller was

00:05:02.959 --> 00:05:05.659
proposed to deliver consumables in to

00:05:05.660 --> 00:05:07.460
low-earth orbit for supplying things

00:05:07.459 --> 00:05:09.379
like the space station but failed to

00:05:09.379 --> 00:05:11.629
get selected. Then there was the US Navy

00:05:11.629 --> 00:05:13.550
which also did research into floating

00:05:13.550 --> 00:05:15.860
launch rockets and found that the

00:05:15.860 --> 00:05:18.379
take-off or smoother and less stressful

00:05:18.379 --> 00:05:20.300
on the rocket than that of a normal

00:05:20.300 --> 00:05:22.730
land-based takeoff. And if you're

00:05:22.730 --> 00:05:24.980
wondering why the water doesn't put out

00:05:24.980 --> 00:05:27.110
the flames it's because the rocket has

00:05:27.110 --> 00:05:29.629
its own liquid oxygen supply just like

00:05:29.629 --> 00:05:30.889
the Rockets that work in space where

00:05:30.889 --> 00:05:33.319
there is no air and the thrust just

00:05:33.319 --> 00:05:35.240
blows the water out of the engine bell.

00:05:35.240 --> 00:05:37.939
In fact the sea makes an excellent

00:05:37.939 --> 00:05:40.459
launch platform as it's indestructible

00:05:40.459 --> 00:05:42.649
it requires very little in the way of

00:05:42.649 --> 00:05:44.659
support systems which makes it very

00:05:44.660 --> 00:05:47.450
cheap, it also provides excellent shock

00:05:47.449 --> 00:05:49.579
and noise oppression and even allowing

00:05:49.579 --> 00:05:51.979
for a slight swell, the density of water

00:05:51.980 --> 00:05:53.930
helps guide to rock it up in the initial

00:05:53.930 --> 00:05:56.389
moments of lift off till it the exits of

00:05:56.389 --> 00:05:59.779
water. As part of a low-cost build and

00:05:59.779 --> 00:06:02.149
the size of Sea Dragon, it would have

00:06:02.149 --> 00:06:04.159
been built in a shipyard a bit like a

00:06:04.160 --> 00:06:07.100
submarine from commonly used materials

00:06:07.100 --> 00:06:09.110
including aluminium, sheet nickel steel

00:06:09.110 --> 00:06:11.360
and stainless steel for the engine Bell.

00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:13.520
It would have then been floated into

00:06:13.519 --> 00:06:15.799
position and fueled allowing it to sink

00:06:15.800 --> 00:06:17.750
so that just the top was sticking out of

00:06:17.750 --> 00:06:19.819
water and it would have been supported

00:06:19.819 --> 00:06:21.319
by flotation tanks under

00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:24.259
rocket. one idea was to use a nuclear

00:06:24.259 --> 00:06:26.449
aircraft carrier to provide the power to

00:06:26.449 --> 00:06:28.969
electrolyze the sea water to make the

00:06:28.970 --> 00:06:31.940
hydrogen and oxygen rocket fuel, although

00:06:31.939 --> 00:06:33.529
the first stage would have been powered

00:06:33.529 --> 00:06:37.129
by RP1 or Kerosene and oxygen, the second

00:06:37.129 --> 00:06:39.439
stage was powered by hydrogen and oxygen.

00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:42.439
Although smaller scale versions called

00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:45.079
the Sea Bee and the Sea Horse were made to

00:06:45.079 --> 00:06:46.819
prove that they could be launched from

00:06:46.819 --> 00:06:49.550
underwater the project came to an end

00:06:49.550 --> 00:06:52.340
when due to budget cuts NASA's future

00:06:52.339 --> 00:06:55.699
projects branch was closed. But even if

00:06:55.699 --> 00:06:57.379
it had had been built it would have been

00:06:57.379 --> 00:07:01.430
a very short life, it was just too big, there

00:07:01.430 --> 00:07:04.160
just wasn't enough stuff to be lifted

00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:06.410
into space to make the economies of

00:07:06.410 --> 00:07:09.890
scale it promised viable. The technology is

00:07:09.889 --> 00:07:11.930
still as perfectly valid today as it was

00:07:11.930 --> 00:07:15.379
in the 1960s and maybe at some point in

00:07:15.379 --> 00:07:17.360
the future when a large amount of

00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:19.129
equipment is needed to be lifted into

00:07:19.129 --> 00:07:21.740
space economically something of a

00:07:21.740 --> 00:07:24.170
similar scale might find a role once

00:07:24.170 --> 00:07:27.170
more and as always thanks for watching

00:07:27.170 --> 00:07:33.220
and please subscribe, rate and share.
